TSTP Solution File: CSR059+6 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : CSR059+6 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v5.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 02:47:12 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 73.57s 67.53s
% Output : CNFRefutation 73.57s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 14 ( 8 unt; 0 nHn; 14 RR)
% Number of literals : 22 ( 0 equ; 11 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 4 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 8 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_787,plain,
( borderson(X1,X2)
| ~ borderson(X2,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-gkudsawl/input.p',i_0_787) ).
cnf(i_0_3321,plain,
( borderson(c_georegion_l4_x56_y47,c_georegion_l4_x57_y47)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member5_mt) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-gkudsawl/input.p',i_0_3321) ).
cnf(i_0_3726,negated_conjecture,
~ borderson(c_georegion_l4_x57_y47,c_georegion_l4_x56_y47),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-gkudsawl/input.p',i_0_3726) ).
cnf(i_0_2828,plain,
( mtvisible(X1)
| ~ mtvisible(X2)
| ~ genlmt(X2,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-gkudsawl/input.p',i_0_2828) ).
cnf(i_0_3027,plain,
genlmt(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt,c_tptpgeo_member5_mt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-gkudsawl/input.p',i_0_3027) ).
cnf(i_0_3727,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-gkudsawl/input.p',i_0_3727) ).
cnf(c_0_3734,plain,
( borderson(X1,X2)
| ~ borderson(X2,X1) ),
i_0_787 ).
cnf(c_0_3735,plain,
( borderson(c_georegion_l4_x56_y47,c_georegion_l4_x57_y47)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member5_mt) ),
i_0_3321 ).
cnf(c_0_3736,negated_conjecture,
~ borderson(c_georegion_l4_x57_y47,c_georegion_l4_x56_y47),
i_0_3726 ).
cnf(c_0_3737,plain,
( mtvisible(X1)
| ~ mtvisible(X2)
| ~ genlmt(X2,X1) ),
i_0_2828 ).
cnf(c_0_3738,plain,
genlmt(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt,c_tptpgeo_member5_mt),
i_0_3027 ).
cnf(c_0_3739,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt),
i_0_3727 ).
cnf(c_0_3740,plain,
~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member5_mt),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3734,c_0_3735]),c_0_3736]) ).
cnf(c_0_3741,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3737,c_0_3738]),c_0_3739])]),c_0_3740]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.11 % Problem : CSR059+6 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v5.3.0.
% 0.04/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Fri Jun 10 11:53:37 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.44 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 64.00/64.24 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 64.00/64.24 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 64.00/64.24 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 64.00/64.24 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 73.57/67.53 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y:
% 73.57/67.53 # Version: 2.1pre011
% 73.57/67.53 # Preprocessing time : 0.061 s
% 73.57/67.53
% 73.57/67.53 # Proof found!
% 73.57/67.53 # SZS status Theorem
% 73.57/67.53 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 73.57/67.53 # Proof object total steps : 14
% 73.57/67.53 # Proof object clause steps : 8
% 73.57/67.53 # Proof object formula steps : 6
% 73.57/67.53 # Proof object conjectures : 4
% 73.57/67.53 # Proof object clause conjectures : 2
% 73.57/67.53 # Proof object formula conjectures : 2
% 73.57/67.53 # Proof object initial clauses used : 6
% 73.57/67.53 # Proof object initial formulas used : 6
% 73.57/67.53 # Proof object generating inferences : 2
% 73.57/67.53 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 4
% 73.57/67.53 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 73.57/67.53 # Parsed axioms : 3727
% 73.57/67.53 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 73.57/67.53 # Initial clauses : 3727
% 73.57/67.53 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 73.57/67.53 # Initial clauses in saturation : 3727
% 73.57/67.53 # Processed clauses : 3758
% 73.57/67.53 # ...of these trivial : 172
% 73.57/67.53 # ...subsumed : 26
% 73.57/67.53 # ...remaining for further processing : 3559
% 73.57/67.53 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 73.57/67.53 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 73.57/67.53 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 73.57/67.53 # Backward-rewritten : 286
% 73.57/67.53 # Generated clauses : 5190
% 73.57/67.53 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 5264
% 73.57/67.53 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 4
% 73.57/67.53 # Paramodulations : 5190
% 73.57/67.53 # Factorizations : 0
% 73.57/67.53 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 73.57/67.53 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 73.57/67.53 # Propositional unsat check successes : 0
% 73.57/67.53 # Current number of processed clauses : 3273
% 73.57/67.53 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 1532
% 73.57/67.53 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 73.57/67.53 # Negative unit clauses : 18
% 73.57/67.53 # Non-unit-clauses : 1723
% 73.57/67.53 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 4375
% 73.57/67.53 # ...number of literals in the above : 8375
% 73.57/67.53 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 73.57/67.53 # Current number of archived clauses : 286
% 73.57/67.53 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 137315
% 73.57/67.53 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 104072
% 73.57/67.53 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 26
% 73.57/67.53 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 28171
% 73.57/67.53 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 73.57/67.53 # BW rewrite match attempts : 325
% 73.57/67.53 # BW rewrite match successes : 2
% 73.57/67.53 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 73.57/67.53 # Condensation successes : 0
% 73.57/67.53 # Termbank termtop insertions : 87942
% 73.57/67.53
% 73.57/67.53 # -------------------------------------------------
% 73.57/67.53 # User time : 0.190 s
% 73.57/67.53 # System time : 0.016 s
% 73.57/67.53 # Total time : 0.206 s
% 73.57/67.53 # ...preprocessing : 0.061 s
% 73.57/67.53 # ...main loop : 0.145 s
% 73.57/67.53 # Maximum resident set size: 27468 pages
% 73.57/67.53
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------