TSTP Solution File: CSR059+1 by SRASS---0.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SRASS---0.1
% Problem  : CSR059+1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : SRASS -q2 -a 0 10 10 10 -i3 -n60 %s

% Computer : art03.cs.miami.edu
% Model    : i686 i686
% CPU      : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory   : 2018MB
% OS       : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Dec 28 23:46:54 EST 2010

% Result   : Theorem 0.92s
% Output   : Solution 0.92s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    : 0

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ERROR: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Reading problem from /tmp/SystemOnTPTP4694/CSR059+1.tptp
% Adding relevance values
% Extracting the conjecture
% Sorting axioms by relevance
% Looking for THM       ... 
% found
% SZS status THM for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP4694/CSR059+1.tptp
% SZS output start Solution for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP4694/CSR059+1.tptp
% TreeLimitedRun: ----------------------------------------------------------
% TreeLimitedRun: /home/graph/tptp/Systems/EP---1.2/eproof --print-statistics -xAuto -tAuto --cpu-limit=60 --proof-time-unlimited --memory-limit=Auto --tstp-in --tstp-out /tmp/SRASS.s.p 
% TreeLimitedRun: CPU time limit is 60s
% TreeLimitedRun: WC  time limit is 120s
% TreeLimitedRun: PID is 4790
% TreeLimitedRun: ----------------------------------------------------------
% PrfWatch: 0.00 CPU 0.02 WC
% # Preprocessing time     : 0.015 s
% # Problem is unsatisfiable (or provable), constructing proof object
% # SZS status Theorem
% # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% fof(1, axiom,![X1]:![X2]:(borderson(X1,X2)=>borderson(X2,X1)),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', just29)).
% fof(3, axiom,(mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member5_mt)=>borderson(c_georegion_l4_x56_y47,c_georegion_l4_x57_y47)),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', just2)).
% fof(4, axiom,![X3]:![X4]:((mtvisible(X3)&genlmt(X3,X4))=>mtvisible(X4)),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', just31)).
% fof(10, axiom,genlmt(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt,c_tptpgeo_member5_mt),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', just1)).
% fof(40, conjecture,(mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt)=>borderson(c_georegion_l4_x57_y47,c_georegion_l4_x56_y47)),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', query59)).
% fof(41, negated_conjecture,~((mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt)=>borderson(c_georegion_l4_x57_y47,c_georegion_l4_x56_y47))),inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[40])).
% fof(43, plain,![X1]:![X2]:(~(borderson(X1,X2))|borderson(X2,X1)),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[1])).
% fof(44, plain,![X3]:![X4]:(~(borderson(X3,X4))|borderson(X4,X3)),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[43])).
% cnf(45,plain,(borderson(X1,X2)|~borderson(X2,X1)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[44])).
% fof(48, plain,(~(mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member5_mt))|borderson(c_georegion_l4_x56_y47,c_georegion_l4_x57_y47)),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[3])).
% cnf(49,plain,(borderson(c_georegion_l4_x56_y47,c_georegion_l4_x57_y47)|~mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member5_mt)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[48])).
% fof(50, plain,![X3]:![X4]:((~(mtvisible(X3))|~(genlmt(X3,X4)))|mtvisible(X4)),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[4])).
% fof(51, plain,![X5]:![X6]:((~(mtvisible(X5))|~(genlmt(X5,X6)))|mtvisible(X6)),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[50])).
% cnf(52,plain,(mtvisible(X1)|~genlmt(X2,X1)|~mtvisible(X2)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[51])).
% cnf(64,plain,(genlmt(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt,c_tptpgeo_member5_mt)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[10])).
% fof(152, negated_conjecture,(mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt)&~(borderson(c_georegion_l4_x57_y47,c_georegion_l4_x56_y47))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[41])).
% cnf(153,negated_conjecture,(~borderson(c_georegion_l4_x57_y47,c_georegion_l4_x56_y47)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[152])).
% cnf(154,negated_conjecture,(mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[152])).
% cnf(155,plain,(mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member5_mt)|~mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[52,64,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(156,plain,(mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member5_mt)|$false),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[155,154,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(157,plain,(mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member5_mt)),inference(cn,[status(thm)],[156,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(161,plain,(borderson(c_georegion_l4_x56_y47,c_georegion_l4_x57_y47)|$false),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[49,157,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(162,plain,(borderson(c_georegion_l4_x56_y47,c_georegion_l4_x57_y47)),inference(cn,[status(thm)],[161,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(164,plain,(borderson(c_georegion_l4_x57_y47,c_georegion_l4_x56_y47)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[45,162,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(166,plain,($false),inference(sr,[status(thm)],[164,153,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(167,plain,($false),166,['proof']).
% # SZS output end CNFRefutation
% # Processed clauses                  : 76
% # ...of these trivial                : 0
% # ...subsumed                        : 8
% # ...remaining for further processing: 68
% # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% # Backward-subsumed                  : 0
% # Backward-rewritten                 : 1
% # Generated clauses                  : 7
% # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 6
% # Contextual simplify-reflections    : 0
% # Paramodulations                    : 7
% # Factorizations                     : 0
% # Equation resolutions               : 0
% # Current number of processed clauses: 34
% #    Positive orientable unit clauses: 6
% #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% #    Negative unit clauses           : 2
% #    Non-unit-clauses                : 26
% # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 4
% # ...number of literals in the above : 5
% # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 44
% # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 44
% # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3
% # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound  : 0
% # Indexed BW rewrite attempts        : 1
% # Indexed BW rewrite successes       : 1
% # Backwards rewriting index:    28 leaves,   1.82+/-1.416 terms/leaf
% # Paramod-from index:            6 leaves,   1.00+/-0.000 terms/leaf
% # Paramod-into index:           22 leaves,   1.59+/-0.937 terms/leaf
% # -------------------------------------------------
% # User time              : 0.015 s
% # System time            : 0.003 s
% # Total time             : 0.018 s
% # Maximum resident set size: 0 pages
% PrfWatch: 0.09 CPU 0.18 WC
% FINAL PrfWatch: 0.09 CPU 0.18 WC
% SZS output end Solution for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP4694/CSR059+1.tptp
% 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------