TSTP Solution File: CSR058+2 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : CSR058+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 03:01:58 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.27s 1.46s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.27s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 10 ( 4 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 16 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 11 ( 5 ~; 2 |; 1 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 3 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 5 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 4 ( 1 sgn 1 !; 2 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query108,conjecture,
? [X13] :
( mtvisible(c_englishmt)
=> prettystring(f_subcollectionofwithrelationfromtypefn(c_terrorist,c_hasmembers,c_terroristgroup),X13) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',query108) ).
fof(ax1_126,axiom,
( mtvisible(c_englishmt)
=> prettystring(f_subcollectionofwithrelationfromtypefn(c_terrorist,c_hasmembers,c_terroristgroup),s_terroristthathasbeenamemberofaterroristorganization) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_126) ).
fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X13] :
( mtvisible(c_englishmt)
=> prettystring(f_subcollectionofwithrelationfromtypefn(c_terrorist,c_hasmembers,c_terroristgroup),X13) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query108]) ).
fof(c_0_3,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_englishmt)
| prettystring(f_subcollectionofwithrelationfromtypefn(c_terrorist,c_hasmembers,c_terroristgroup),s_terroristthathasbeenamemberofaterroristorganization) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax1_126]) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
! [X14] :
( mtvisible(c_englishmt)
& ~ prettystring(f_subcollectionofwithrelationfromtypefn(c_terrorist,c_hasmembers,c_terroristgroup),X14) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,plain,
( prettystring(f_subcollectionofwithrelationfromtypefn(c_terrorist,c_hasmembers,c_terroristgroup),s_terroristthathasbeenamemberofaterroristorganization)
| ~ mtvisible(c_englishmt) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_englishmt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
prettystring(f_subcollectionofwithrelationfromtypefn(c_terrorist,c_hasmembers,c_terroristgroup),s_terroristthathasbeenamemberofaterroristorganization),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6])]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
~ prettystring(f_subcollectionofwithrelationfromtypefn(c_terrorist,c_hasmembers,c_terroristgroup),X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : CSR058+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.07/0.12 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Fri Jun 10 10:09:18 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.27/1.46 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.27/1.46 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.27/1.46 # Preprocessing time : 0.033 s
% 0.27/1.46
% 0.27/1.46 # Failure: Out of unprocessed clauses!
% 0.27/1.46 # OLD status GaveUp
% 0.27/1.46 # Parsed axioms : 1132
% 0.27/1.46 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 1082
% 0.27/1.46 # Initial clauses : 51
% 0.27/1.46 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.27/1.46 # Initial clauses in saturation : 51
% 0.27/1.46 # Processed clauses : 53
% 0.27/1.46 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.27/1.46 # ...subsumed : 11
% 0.27/1.46 # ...remaining for further processing : 42
% 0.27/1.46 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.27/1.46 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.27/1.46 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.27/1.46 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.27/1.46 # Generated clauses : 10
% 0.27/1.46 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 2
% 0.27/1.46 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.27/1.46 # Paramodulations : 10
% 0.27/1.46 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.27/1.46 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.27/1.46 # Current number of processed clauses : 42
% 0.27/1.46 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 26
% 0.27/1.46 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.27/1.46 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.27/1.46 # Non-unit-clauses : 15
% 0.27/1.46 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.27/1.46 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.27/1.46 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.27/1.46 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.27/1.46 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 37
% 0.27/1.46 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 31
% 0.27/1.46 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 11
% 0.27/1.46 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.27/1.46 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.27/1.46 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.27/1.46 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.27/1.46 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.27/1.46 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.27/1.46 # Termbank termtop insertions : 9631
% 0.27/1.46
% 0.27/1.46 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.27/1.46 # User time : 0.029 s
% 0.27/1.46 # System time : 0.005 s
% 0.27/1.46 # Total time : 0.034 s
% 0.27/1.46 # Maximum resident set size: 5220 pages
% 0.27/1.46 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_f171197f65f27d1ba69648a20c844832c84a5dd7 for 23 seconds:
% 0.27/1.46 # Preprocessing time : 0.050 s
% 0.27/1.46
% 0.27/1.46 # Proof found!
% 0.27/1.46 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.27/1.46 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.27/1.46 # Proof object total steps : 10
% 0.27/1.46 # Proof object clause steps : 5
% 0.27/1.46 # Proof object formula steps : 5
% 0.27/1.46 # Proof object conjectures : 5
% 0.27/1.46 # Proof object clause conjectures : 2
% 0.27/1.46 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.27/1.46 # Proof object initial clauses used : 3
% 0.27/1.46 # Proof object initial formulas used : 2
% 0.27/1.46 # Proof object generating inferences : 0
% 0.27/1.46 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 3
% 0.27/1.46 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.27/1.46 # Parsed axioms : 1132
% 0.27/1.46 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.27/1.46 # Initial clauses : 1133
% 0.27/1.46 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.27/1.46 # Initial clauses in saturation : 1133
% 0.27/1.46 # Processed clauses : 280
% 0.27/1.46 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.27/1.46 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.27/1.46 # ...remaining for further processing : 280
% 0.27/1.46 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.27/1.46 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.27/1.46 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.27/1.46 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.27/1.46 # Generated clauses : 84
% 0.27/1.46 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 71
% 0.27/1.46 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.27/1.46 # Paramodulations : 83
% 0.27/1.46 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.27/1.46 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.27/1.46 # Current number of processed clauses : 279
% 0.27/1.46 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 148
% 0.27/1.46 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.27/1.46 # Negative unit clauses : 4
% 0.27/1.46 # Non-unit-clauses : 127
% 0.27/1.46 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 923
% 0.27/1.46 # ...number of literals in the above : 1690
% 0.27/1.46 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.27/1.46 # Current number of archived clauses : 1
% 0.27/1.46 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 4453
% 0.27/1.46 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 4440
% 0.27/1.46 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.27/1.46 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 191
% 0.27/1.46 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.27/1.46 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.27/1.46 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.27/1.46 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.27/1.46 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.27/1.46 # Termbank termtop insertions : 44729
% 0.27/1.46
% 0.27/1.46 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.27/1.46 # User time : 0.050 s
% 0.27/1.46 # System time : 0.010 s
% 0.27/1.46 # Total time : 0.060 s
% 0.27/1.46 # Maximum resident set size: 7700 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------