TSTP Solution File: CSR057+4 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : CSR057+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 02:47:09 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 11.67s 4.08s
% Output : CNFRefutation 11.67s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 11
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 30 ( 15 unt; 0 nHn; 30 RR)
% Number of literals : 47 ( 0 equ; 22 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 9 ( 8 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 4 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 17 ( 2 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_2194,plain,
( mtvisible(X1)
| ~ mtvisible(X2)
| ~ genlmt(X2,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-vkd1u2cb/input.p',i_0_2194) ).
cnf(i_0_1002,plain,
genlmt(c_tptpgeo_member8_mt,c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-vkd1u2cb/input.p',i_0_1002) ).
cnf(i_0_2518,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member8_mt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-vkd1u2cb/input.p',i_0_2518) ).
cnf(i_0_2517,negated_conjecture,
~ inregion(X1,c_georegion_l4_x75_y75),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-vkd1u2cb/input.p',i_0_2517) ).
cnf(i_0_2005,plain,
( inregion(X1,X1)
| ~ spatialthing_nonsituational(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-vkd1u2cb/input.p',i_0_2005) ).
cnf(i_0_80,plain,
genlmt(c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt,c_worldgeographymt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-vkd1u2cb/input.p',i_0_80) ).
cnf(i_0_935,plain,
( spatialthing_nonsituational(X1)
| ~ enduringthing_localized(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-vkd1u2cb/input.p',i_0_935) ).
cnf(i_0_758,plain,
( enduringthing_localized(X1)
| ~ geographicalthing(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-vkd1u2cb/input.p',i_0_758) ).
cnf(i_0_196,plain,
( geographicalthing(X1)
| ~ geographicalregion(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-vkd1u2cb/input.p',i_0_196) ).
cnf(i_0_206,plain,
( geolevel_4(c_georegion_l4_x75_y75)
| ~ mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-vkd1u2cb/input.p',i_0_206) ).
cnf(i_0_730,plain,
( geographicalregion(X1)
| ~ geolevel_4(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-vkd1u2cb/input.p',i_0_730) ).
cnf(c_0_2530,plain,
( mtvisible(X1)
| ~ mtvisible(X2)
| ~ genlmt(X2,X1) ),
i_0_2194 ).
cnf(c_0_2531,plain,
genlmt(c_tptpgeo_member8_mt,c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt),
i_0_1002 ).
cnf(c_0_2532,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member8_mt),
i_0_2518 ).
cnf(c_0_2533,negated_conjecture,
~ inregion(X1,c_georegion_l4_x75_y75),
i_0_2517 ).
cnf(c_0_2534,plain,
( inregion(X1,X1)
| ~ spatialthing_nonsituational(X1) ),
i_0_2005 ).
cnf(c_0_2535,plain,
genlmt(c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt,c_worldgeographymt),
i_0_80 ).
cnf(c_0_2536,plain,
mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2530,c_0_2531]),c_0_2532])]) ).
cnf(c_0_2537,negated_conjecture,
~ spatialthing_nonsituational(c_georegion_l4_x75_y75),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2533,c_0_2534]) ).
cnf(c_0_2538,plain,
( spatialthing_nonsituational(X1)
| ~ enduringthing_localized(X1) ),
i_0_935 ).
cnf(c_0_2539,plain,
( enduringthing_localized(X1)
| ~ geographicalthing(X1) ),
i_0_758 ).
cnf(c_0_2540,plain,
( geographicalthing(X1)
| ~ geographicalregion(X1) ),
i_0_196 ).
cnf(c_0_2541,plain,
( geolevel_4(c_georegion_l4_x75_y75)
| ~ mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt) ),
i_0_206 ).
cnf(c_0_2542,plain,
mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2530,c_0_2535]),c_0_2536])]) ).
cnf(c_0_2543,plain,
~ enduringthing_localized(c_georegion_l4_x75_y75),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2537,c_0_2538]) ).
cnf(c_0_2544,plain,
( enduringthing_localized(X1)
| ~ geographicalregion(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2539,c_0_2540]) ).
cnf(c_0_2545,plain,
( geographicalregion(X1)
| ~ geolevel_4(X1) ),
i_0_730 ).
cnf(c_0_2546,plain,
geolevel_4(c_georegion_l4_x75_y75),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_2541,c_0_2542])]) ).
cnf(c_0_2547,plain,
~ geographicalregion(c_georegion_l4_x75_y75),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2543,c_0_2544]) ).
cnf(c_0_2548,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2545,c_0_2546]),c_0_2547]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : CSR057+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.33 % DateTime : Fri Jun 10 01:14:04 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.44 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.87/1.05 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.87/1.05 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.87/1.05 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.87/1.05 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 11.67/4.08 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN:
% 11.67/4.08 # Version: 2.1pre011
% 11.67/4.08 # Preprocessing time : 0.076 s
% 11.67/4.08
% 11.67/4.08 # Proof found!
% 11.67/4.08 # SZS status Theorem
% 11.67/4.08 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 11.67/4.08 # Proof object total steps : 30
% 11.67/4.08 # Proof object clause steps : 19
% 11.67/4.08 # Proof object formula steps : 11
% 11.67/4.08 # Proof object conjectures : 5
% 11.67/4.08 # Proof object clause conjectures : 3
% 11.67/4.08 # Proof object formula conjectures : 2
% 11.67/4.08 # Proof object initial clauses used : 11
% 11.67/4.08 # Proof object initial formulas used : 11
% 11.67/4.08 # Proof object generating inferences : 7
% 11.67/4.08 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 7
% 11.67/4.08 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 11.67/4.08 # Parsed axioms : 2517
% 11.67/4.08 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 11.67/4.08 # Initial clauses : 2517
% 11.67/4.08 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 11.67/4.08 # Initial clauses in saturation : 2517
% 11.67/4.08 # Processed clauses : 3550
% 11.67/4.08 # ...of these trivial : 331
% 11.67/4.08 # ...subsumed : 171
% 11.67/4.08 # ...remaining for further processing : 3047
% 11.67/4.08 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 2
% 11.67/4.08 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 11.67/4.08 # Backward-subsumed : 7
% 11.67/4.08 # Backward-rewritten : 90
% 11.67/4.08 # Generated clauses : 4878
% 11.67/4.08 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 4471
% 11.67/4.08 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 23
% 11.67/4.08 # Paramodulations : 4876
% 11.67/4.08 # Factorizations : 0
% 11.67/4.08 # Equation resolutions : 2
% 11.67/4.08 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 11.67/4.08 # Propositional unsat check successes : 0
% 11.67/4.08 # Current number of processed clauses : 2948
% 11.67/4.08 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 1068
% 11.67/4.08 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 11.67/4.08 # Negative unit clauses : 175
% 11.67/4.08 # Non-unit-clauses : 1705
% 11.67/4.08 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 3272
% 11.67/4.08 # ...number of literals in the above : 6094
% 11.67/4.08 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 11.67/4.08 # Current number of archived clauses : 97
% 11.67/4.08 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 417528
% 11.67/4.08 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 322133
% 11.67/4.08 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 184
% 11.67/4.08 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 131354
% 11.67/4.08 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 11.67/4.08 # BW rewrite match attempts : 676
% 11.67/4.08 # BW rewrite match successes : 30
% 11.67/4.08 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 11.67/4.08 # Condensation successes : 0
% 11.67/4.08 # Termbank termtop insertions : 84352
% 11.67/4.08
% 11.67/4.08 # -------------------------------------------------
% 11.67/4.08 # User time : 0.295 s
% 11.67/4.08 # System time : 0.021 s
% 11.67/4.08 # Total time : 0.316 s
% 11.67/4.08 # ...preprocessing : 0.076 s
% 11.67/4.08 # ...main loop : 0.240 s
% 11.67/4.08 # Maximum resident set size: 21160 pages
% 11.67/4.08
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------