TSTP Solution File: CSR057+3 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : CSR057+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 03:01:57 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.88s 2.05s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.88s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 30 ( 11 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 52 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 38 ( 16 ~; 13 |; 2 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 7 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 6 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 7 ( 6 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 4 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 22 ( 1 sgn 13 !; 2 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query157,conjecture,
? [X15] :
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member8_mt)
=> inregion(X15,c_georegion_l4_x75_y75) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',query157) ).
fof(ax2_7997,axiom,
! [X21,X22] :
( ( mtvisible(X21)
& genlmt(X21,X22) )
=> mtvisible(X22) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_7997) ).
fof(ax2_1724,axiom,
! [X1] :
( geolevel_4(X1)
=> geographicalregion(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_1724) ).
fof(ax2_1120,axiom,
( mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt)
=> geolevel_4(c_georegion_l4_x75_y75) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_1120) ).
fof(ax2_1229,axiom,
genlmt(c_tptpgeo_member8_mt,c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_1229) ).
fof(ax2_1111,axiom,
genlmt(c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt,c_worldgeographymt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_1111) ).
fof(ax2_7882,axiom,
! [X15] :
( geographicalregion(X15)
=> geographicalsubregions(X15,X15) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_7882) ).
fof(ax2_1935,axiom,
! [X3,X4] :
( geographicalsubregions(X3,X4)
=> inregion(X4,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_1935) ).
fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X15] :
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member8_mt)
=> inregion(X15,c_georegion_l4_x75_y75) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query157]) ).
fof(c_0_9,plain,
! [X23,X24] :
( ~ mtvisible(X23)
| ~ genlmt(X23,X24)
| mtvisible(X24) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax2_7997])]) ).
fof(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
! [X16] :
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member8_mt)
& ~ inregion(X16,c_georegion_l4_x75_y75) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_11,plain,
! [X2] :
( ~ geolevel_4(X2)
| geographicalregion(X2) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax2_1724])]) ).
fof(c_0_12,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt)
| geolevel_4(c_georegion_l4_x75_y75) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax2_1120]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( mtvisible(X1)
| ~ genlmt(X2,X1)
| ~ mtvisible(X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
genlmt(c_tptpgeo_member8_mt,c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax2_1229]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member8_mt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( geographicalregion(X1)
| ~ geolevel_4(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( geolevel_4(c_georegion_l4_x75_y75)
| ~ mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
genlmt(c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt,c_worldgeographymt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax2_1111]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_15])]) ).
fof(c_0_20,plain,
! [X16] :
( ~ geographicalregion(X16)
| geographicalsubregions(X16,X16) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax2_7882])]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
( geographicalregion(c_georegion_l4_x75_y75)
| ~ mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_18]),c_0_19])]) ).
fof(c_0_23,plain,
! [X5,X6] :
( ~ geographicalsubregions(X5,X6)
| inregion(X6,X5) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax2_1935])]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
( geographicalsubregions(X1,X1)
| ~ geographicalregion(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
geographicalregion(c_georegion_l4_x75_y75),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22])]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
( inregion(X1,X2)
| ~ geographicalsubregions(X2,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_23]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l4_x75_y75,c_georegion_l4_x75_y75),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
~ inregion(X1,c_georegion_l4_x75_y75),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]),c_0_28]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : CSR057+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 05:52:40 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.88/2.05 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.88/2.05 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.88/2.05 # Preprocessing time : 0.158 s
% 0.88/2.05
% 0.88/2.05 # Proof found!
% 0.88/2.05 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.88/2.05 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.88/2.05 # Proof object total steps : 30
% 0.88/2.05 # Proof object clause steps : 15
% 0.88/2.05 # Proof object formula steps : 15
% 0.88/2.05 # Proof object conjectures : 5
% 0.88/2.05 # Proof object clause conjectures : 2
% 0.88/2.05 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.88/2.05 # Proof object initial clauses used : 9
% 0.88/2.05 # Proof object initial formulas used : 8
% 0.88/2.05 # Proof object generating inferences : 5
% 0.88/2.05 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 7
% 0.88/2.05 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.88/2.05 # Parsed axioms : 8006
% 0.88/2.05 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 7919
% 0.88/2.05 # Initial clauses : 88
% 0.88/2.05 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.88/2.05 # Initial clauses in saturation : 88
% 0.88/2.05 # Processed clauses : 109
% 0.88/2.05 # ...of these trivial : 13
% 0.88/2.05 # ...subsumed : 15
% 0.88/2.05 # ...remaining for further processing : 81
% 0.88/2.05 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.88/2.05 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.88/2.05 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.88/2.05 # Backward-rewritten : 2
% 0.88/2.05 # Generated clauses : 64
% 0.88/2.05 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 47
% 0.88/2.05 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.88/2.05 # Paramodulations : 64
% 0.88/2.05 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.88/2.05 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.88/2.05 # Current number of processed clauses : 79
% 0.88/2.05 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 38
% 0.88/2.05 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.88/2.05 # Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.88/2.05 # Non-unit-clauses : 39
% 0.88/2.05 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 26
% 0.88/2.05 # ...number of literals in the above : 50
% 0.88/2.05 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.88/2.05 # Current number of archived clauses : 2
% 0.88/2.05 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 168
% 0.88/2.05 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 153
% 0.88/2.05 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 15
% 0.88/2.05 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 58
% 0.88/2.05 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.88/2.05 # BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 0.88/2.05 # BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.88/2.05 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.88/2.05 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.88/2.05 # Termbank termtop insertions : 54189
% 0.88/2.05
% 0.88/2.05 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.88/2.05 # User time : 0.143 s
% 0.88/2.05 # System time : 0.017 s
% 0.88/2.05 # Total time : 0.160 s
% 0.88/2.05 # Maximum resident set size: 19712 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------