TSTP Solution File: CSR057+3 by E---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1.00
% Problem : CSR057+3 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon May 20 19:13:48 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.44s 0.74s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.44s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 9
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 35 ( 12 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 61 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 46 ( 20 ~; 16 |; 2 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 8 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 6 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 8 ( 7 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 4 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 26 ( 1 sgn 15 !; 2 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query157,conjecture,
? [X15] :
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member8_mt)
=> inregion(X15,c_georegion_l4_x75_y75) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query157) ).
fof(ax2_7997,axiom,
! [X21,X22] :
( ( mtvisible(X21)
& genlmt(X21,X22) )
=> mtvisible(X22) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_7997) ).
fof(ax2_1111,axiom,
genlmt(c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt,c_worldgeographymt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_1111) ).
fof(ax2_1229,axiom,
genlmt(c_tptpgeo_member8_mt,c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_1229) ).
fof(ax2_1120,axiom,
( mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt)
=> geolevel_4(c_georegion_l4_x75_y75) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_1120) ).
fof(ax2_3298,axiom,
! [X3,X4] :
( physicaldecompositions(X3,X4)
=> inregion(X4,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_3298) ).
fof(ax2_7475,axiom,
! [X15] :
( partiallytangible(X15)
=> physicaldecompositions(X15,X15) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_7475) ).
fof(ax2_1724,axiom,
! [X1] :
( geolevel_4(X1)
=> geographicalregion(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_1724) ).
fof(ax2_719,axiom,
! [X1] :
( geographicalregion(X1)
=> partiallytangible(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_719) ).
fof(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X15] :
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member8_mt)
=> inregion(X15,c_georegion_l4_x75_y75) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query157]) ).
fof(c_0_10,plain,
! [X46,X47] :
( ~ mtvisible(X46)
| ~ genlmt(X46,X47)
| mtvisible(X47) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax2_7997])])]) ).
fof(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
! [X23] :
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member8_mt)
& ~ inregion(X23,c_georegion_l4_x75_y75) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( mtvisible(X2)
| ~ mtvisible(X1)
| ~ genlmt(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
genlmt(c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt,c_worldgeographymt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax2_1111]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
genlmt(c_tptpgeo_member8_mt,c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax2_1229]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member8_mt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
fof(c_0_16,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt)
| geolevel_4(c_georegion_l4_x75_y75) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax2_1120])]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_14]),c_0_15])]) ).
fof(c_0_19,plain,
! [X34,X35] :
( ~ physicaldecompositions(X34,X35)
| inregion(X35,X34) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax2_3298])])]) ).
fof(c_0_20,plain,
! [X93] :
( ~ partiallytangible(X93)
| physicaldecompositions(X93,X93) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax2_7475])])]) ).
fof(c_0_21,plain,
! [X117] :
( ~ geolevel_4(X117)
| geographicalregion(X117) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax2_1724])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
( geolevel_4(c_georegion_l4_x75_y75)
| ~ mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18])]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
( inregion(X2,X1)
| ~ physicaldecompositions(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
( physicaldecompositions(X1,X1)
| ~ partiallytangible(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).
fof(c_0_26,plain,
! [X131] :
( ~ geographicalregion(X131)
| partiallytangible(X131) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax2_719])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
( geographicalregion(X1)
| ~ geolevel_4(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
geolevel_4(c_georegion_l4_x75_y75),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23])]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
~ inregion(X1,c_georegion_l4_x75_y75),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
( inregion(X1,X1)
| ~ partiallytangible(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,plain,
( partiallytangible(X1)
| ~ geographicalregion(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_26]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,plain,
geographicalregion(c_georegion_l4_x75_y75),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
~ partiallytangible(c_georegion_l4_x75_y75),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]) ).
cnf(c_0_34,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]),c_0_33]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.13 % Problem : CSR057+3 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.08/0.14 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.38 % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.38 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.38 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.38 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.38 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.38 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.38 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.38 % DateTime : Sun May 19 01:43:23 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.38 % CPUTime :
% 0.23/0.50 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.23/0.50 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.44/0.74 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.44/0.74 # Preprocessing class: FMLLMMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.44/0.74 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.44/0.74 # Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.44/0.74 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.44/0.74 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.44/0.74 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.44/0.74 # sh5l with pid 32549 completed with status 0
% 0.44/0.74 # Result found by sh5l
% 0.44/0.74 # Preprocessing class: FMLLMMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.44/0.74 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.44/0.74 # Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.44/0.74 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.44/0.74 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.44/0.74 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.44/0.74 # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.44/0.74 # Search class: FHHNM-FSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.44/0.74 # partial match(2): FGHSM-FSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.44/0.74 # Scheduled 12 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.44/0.74 # Starting G-E--_303_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y with 25s (1) cores
% 0.44/0.74 # G-E--_303_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y with pid 32552 completed with status 0
% 0.44/0.74 # Result found by G-E--_303_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y
% 0.44/0.74 # Preprocessing class: FMLLMMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.44/0.74 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.44/0.74 # Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.44/0.74 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.44/0.74 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.44/0.74 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.44/0.74 # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.44/0.74 # Search class: FHHNM-FSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.44/0.74 # partial match(2): FGHSM-FSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.44/0.74 # Scheduled 12 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.44/0.74 # Starting G-E--_303_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y with 25s (1) cores
% 0.44/0.74 # Preprocessing time : 0.014 s
% 0.44/0.74
% 0.44/0.74 # Proof found!
% 0.44/0.74 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.44/0.74 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.44/0.74 # Parsed axioms : 8006
% 0.44/0.74 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 7419
% 0.44/0.74 # Initial clauses : 588
% 0.44/0.74 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.44/0.74 # Initial clauses in saturation : 588
% 0.44/0.74 # Processed clauses : 634
% 0.44/0.74 # ...of these trivial : 57
% 0.44/0.74 # ...subsumed : 55
% 0.44/0.74 # ...remaining for further processing : 522
% 0.44/0.74 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.44/0.74 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.44/0.74 # Backward-subsumed : 1
% 0.44/0.74 # Backward-rewritten : 12
% 0.44/0.74 # Generated clauses : 727
% 0.44/0.74 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 664
% 0.44/0.74 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.44/0.74 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.44/0.74 # Paramodulations : 727
% 0.44/0.74 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.44/0.74 # NegExts : 0
% 0.44/0.74 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.44/0.74 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.44/0.74 # Total rewrite steps : 95
% 0.44/0.74 # ...of those cached : 32
% 0.44/0.74 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.44/0.74 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.44/0.74 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.44/0.74 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.44/0.74 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.44/0.74 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.44/0.74 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.44/0.74 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.44/0.74 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.44/0.74 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.44/0.74 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.44/0.74 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.44/0.74 # Current number of processed clauses : 509
% 0.44/0.74 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 219
% 0.44/0.74 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.44/0.74 # Negative unit clauses : 21
% 0.44/0.74 # Non-unit-clauses : 269
% 0.44/0.74 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 617
% 0.44/0.74 # ...number of literals in the above : 1155
% 0.44/0.74 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.44/0.74 # Current number of archived clauses : 13
% 0.44/0.74 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 7519
% 0.44/0.74 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 6703
% 0.44/0.74 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 56
% 0.44/0.74 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2819
% 0.44/0.74 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.44/0.74 # BW rewrite match attempts : 6
% 0.44/0.74 # BW rewrite match successes : 4
% 0.44/0.74 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.44/0.74 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.44/0.74 # Termbank termtop insertions : 79119
% 0.44/0.74 # Search garbage collected termcells : 31811
% 0.44/0.74
% 0.44/0.74 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.44/0.74 # User time : 0.074 s
% 0.44/0.74 # System time : 0.026 s
% 0.44/0.74 # Total time : 0.100 s
% 0.44/0.74 # Maximum resident set size: 18512 pages
% 0.44/0.74
% 0.44/0.74 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.44/0.74 # User time : 0.193 s
% 0.44/0.74 # System time : 0.037 s
% 0.44/0.74 # Total time : 0.229 s
% 0.44/0.74 # Maximum resident set size: 7956 pages
% 0.44/0.74 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.90/0.74 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------