TSTP Solution File: CSR057+1 by SPASS---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SPASS---3.9
% Problem : CSR057+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp
% Command : run_spass %d %s
% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 23:24:48 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.19s 0.45s
% Output : Refutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : CSR057+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : run_spass %d %s
% 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.33 % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 03:28:04 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.45
% 0.19/0.45 SPASS V 3.9
% 0.19/0.45 SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.19/0.45 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.19/0.45 Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.45 SPASS derived 50 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 101 clauses.
% 0.19/0.45 SPASS allocated 97776 KBytes.
% 0.19/0.45 SPASS spent 0:00:00.10 on the problem.
% 0.19/0.45 0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 0.19/0.45 0:00:00.03 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.19/0.45 0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.19/0.45 0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.19/0.45 0:00:00.00 for the reduction.
% 0.19/0.45
% 0.19/0.45
% 0.19/0.45 Here is a proof with depth 5, length 21 :
% 0.19/0.45 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.19/0.45 1[0:Inp] || -> mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member8_mt)*.
% 0.19/0.45 23[0:Inp] || -> genlmt(c_tptpgeo_member8_mt,c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt)*r.
% 0.19/0.45 24[0:Inp] || -> genlmt(c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt,c_worldgeographymt)*r.
% 0.19/0.45 31[0:Inp] || inregion(u,c_georegion_l4_x75_y75)*+ -> .
% 0.19/0.45 37[0:Inp] || mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt)+ -> geolevel_4(c_georegion_l4_x75_y75)*.
% 0.19/0.45 38[0:Inp] geolevel_4(u) || -> geographicalregion(u)*.
% 0.19/0.45 39[0:Inp] enduringthing_localized(u) || -> spatialthing_nonsituational(u)*.
% 0.19/0.45 40[0:Inp] partiallytangible(u) || -> enduringthing_localized(u)*.
% 0.19/0.45 41[0:Inp] geographicalregion(u) || -> partiallytangible(u)*.
% 0.19/0.45 72[0:Inp] spatialthing_nonsituational(u) || -> inregion(u,u)*.
% 0.19/0.45 86[0:Inp] mtvisible(u) || genlmt(u,v)* -> mtvisible(v)*.
% 0.19/0.45 100[0:Inp] || genlmt(u,v)* genlmt(v,w)* -> genlmt(u,w)*.
% 0.19/0.45 104[0:Res:1.0,86.0] || genlmt(c_tptpgeo_member8_mt,u)+ -> mtvisible(u)*.
% 0.19/0.45 105[0:Res:72.1,31.0] spatialthing_nonsituational(c_georegion_l4_x75_y75) || -> .
% 0.19/0.45 139[0:SoR:105.0,39.1] enduringthing_localized(c_georegion_l4_x75_y75) || -> .
% 0.19/0.45 140[0:SoR:139.0,40.1] partiallytangible(c_georegion_l4_x75_y75) || -> .
% 0.19/0.45 141[0:SoR:140.0,41.1] geographicalregion(c_georegion_l4_x75_y75) || -> .
% 0.19/0.45 142[0:SoR:141.0,38.1] geolevel_4(c_georegion_l4_x75_y75) || -> .
% 0.19/0.45 143[0:MRR:37.1,142.0] || mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt)*+ -> .
% 0.19/0.45 184[0:NCh:100.2,100.1,104.0,24.0] || genlmt(c_tptpgeo_member8_mt,c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt) -> mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt)*.
% 0.19/0.45 187[0:MRR:184.0,184.1,23.0,143.0] || -> .
% 0.19/0.45 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.19/0.45 Formulae used in the proof : query57 just30 just31 just27 just29 just34 just36 just40 just84 just93 just98
% 0.19/0.45
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------