TSTP Solution File: CSR057+1 by SOS---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : CSR057+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 23:21:39 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.42s 0.59s
% Output   : Refutation 0.42s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem  : CSR057+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.11/0.12  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.13/0.33  % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.33  % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 03:22:46 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.35  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.13/0.35  The process was started by sandbox on n011.cluster.edu,
% 0.13/0.35  Sat Jun 11 03:22:46 2022
% 0.13/0.35  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 32723.
% 0.13/0.35  
% 0.13/0.35  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.13/0.35  set(auto).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.13/0.35  clear(print_given).
% 0.13/0.35  
% 0.13/0.35  formula_list(usable).
% 0.13/0.35  
% 0.13/0.35  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=3.
% 0.13/0.35  
% 0.13/0.36  This is a Horn set without equality.  The strategy will
% 0.13/0.36  be hyperresolution, with satellites in sos and nuclei
% 0.13/0.36  in usable.
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: clear(order_hyper).
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36  ------------> process usable:
% 0.13/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 1 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -genlinverse(A,B)| -genlinverse(B,C)|genlpreds(A,C).
% 0.13/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 2 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -isa(A,B)| -isa(A,C)| -disjointwith(B,C).
% 0.13/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 3 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt)|geolevel_4(c_georegion_l4_x75_y75).
% 0.13/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 4 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -geolevel_4(A)|geographicalregion(A).
% 0.13/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 5 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -enduringthing_localized(A)|spatialthing_nonsituational(A).
% 0.13/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 6 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -partiallytangible(A)|enduringthing_localized(A).
% 0.13/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 7 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -geographicalregion(A)|partiallytangible(A).
% 0.13/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 2 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -isa(A,B)| -isa(A,C)| -disjointwith(B,C).
% 0.13/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 1 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -genlinverse(A,B)| -genlinverse(B,C)|genlpreds(A,C).
% 0.13/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 16 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -genls(A,B)|collection(B).
% 0.13/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 17 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -genls(A,B)|collection(A).
% 0.13/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 19 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -collection(A)|genls(A,A).
% 0.13/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 18 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -genls(A,B)| -genls(C,A)|genls(C,B).
% 0.13/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 18 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -genls(A,B)| -genls(B,C)|genls(A,C).
% 0.13/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 27 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -genlpreds(A,B)|predicate(B).
% 0.13/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 28 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -genlpreds(A,B)|predicate(A).
% 0.13/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 30 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -predicate(A)|genlpreds(A,A).
% 0.13/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 43 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -isa(A,B)|collection(B).
% 0.13/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 44 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -isa(A,B)|thing(A).
% 0.13/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 47 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -genlmt(A,B)|microtheory(B).
% 0.13/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 48 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -genlmt(A,B)|microtheory(A).
% 0.13/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 50 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -microtheory(A)|genlmt(A,A).
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36  ------------> process sos:
% 0.13/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 58 during input processing: 0 [] {-} genlmt(c_tptpgeo_member8_mt,c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt).
% 0.13/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 57 during input processing: 0 [] {-} genlmt(c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt,c_worldgeographymt).
% 0.13/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 56 during input processing: 0 [] {-} genlmt(c_basekb,c_universalvocabularymt).
% 0.13/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 54 during input processing: 0 [] {-} transitivebinarypredicate(c_genlmt).
% 0.13/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 53 during input processing: 0 [] {-} genlmt(c_worldgeographymt,c_geographymt).
% 0.13/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 52 during input processing: 0 [] {-} genlmt(c_geographymt,c_basekb).
% 0.13/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 59 during input processing: 0 [] {-} genls(c_geolevel_4,c_geographicalregion).
% 0.13/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 58 during input processing: 0 [] {-} genlmt(c_tptpgeo_member8_mt,c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt).
% 0.13/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 57 during input processing: 0 [] {-} genlmt(c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt,c_worldgeographymt).
% 0.13/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 56 during input processing: 0 [] {-} genlmt(c_basekb,c_universalvocabularymt).
% 0.13/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 60 during input processing: 0 [] {-} genls(c_enduringthing_localized,c_spatialthing_nonsituational).
% 0.13/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 61 during input processing: 0 [] {-} genls(c_partiallytangible,c_enduringthing_localized).
% 0.13/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 54 during input processing: 0 [] {-} transitivebinarypredicate(c_genlmt).
% 0.13/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 53 during input processing: 0 [] {-} genlmt(c_worldgeographymt,c_geographymt).
% 0.13/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 62 during input processing: 0 [] {-} genls(c_geographicalregion,c_partiallytangible).
% 0.13/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 52 during input processing: 0 [] {-} genlmt(c_geographymt,c_basekb).
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.13/0.39  
% 0.13/0.39  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.13/0.39  
% 0.13/0.39  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.13/0.39  
% 0.13/0.39  
% 0.13/0.39  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.13/0.39  
% 0.13/0.39  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.13/0.39  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.13/0.39  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.13/0.39  number of clauses in intial UL: 51
% 0.13/0.39  number of clauses initially in problem: 65
% 0.13/0.39  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 78
% 0.13/0.39  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 80
% 0.13/0.39  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.13/0.39  absolute distinct symbol count: 36
% 0.13/0.39     distinct predicate count: 20
% 0.13/0.39     distinct function count: 0
% 0.13/0.39     distinct constant count: 16
% 0.13/0.39  
% 0.13/0.39  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.13/0.39  
% 0.13/0.39  
% 0.13/0.39  
% 0.13/0.39  Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.13/0.39  
% 0.13/0.39  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.13/0.39  
% 0.13/0.39  =========== start of search ===========
% 0.42/0.59  
% 0.42/0.59  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 0.42/0.59  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.42/0.59  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.42/0.59  
% 0.42/0.59  Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.42/0.59  
% 0.42/0.59  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.42/0.59  
% 0.42/0.59  Model 4 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.42/0.59  
% 0.42/0.59  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.42/0.59  
% 0.42/0.59  Model 5 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.42/0.59  
% 0.42/0.59  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.42/0.59  
% 0.42/0.59  Model 6 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.42/0.59  
% 0.42/0.59  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.42/0.59  
% 0.42/0.59  Model 7 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.42/0.59  
% 0.42/0.59  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.42/0.59  
% 0.42/0.59  Model 8 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.42/0.59  
% 0.42/0.59  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.42/0.59  
% 0.42/0.59  Model 9 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.42/0.59  
% 0.42/0.59  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.42/0.59  
% 0.42/0.59  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.42/0.59  
% 0.42/0.59  Model 10 [ 1 0 423 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.42/0.59  
% 0.42/0.59  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.42/0.59  
% 0.42/0.59  Model 11 [ 1 0 171 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.42/0.59  
% 0.42/0.59  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at   0.22 sec ----> 94 [binary,93.1,51.1] {-} $F.
% 0.42/0.59  
% 0.42/0.59  Length of proof is 8.  Level of proof is 8.
% 0.42/0.59  
% 0.42/0.59  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 0.42/0.59  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.42/0.59  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.42/0.59  
% 0.42/0.59  3 [] {+} -mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt)|geolevel_4(c_georegion_l4_x75_y75).
% 0.42/0.59  4 [] {+} -geolevel_4(A)|geographicalregion(A).
% 0.42/0.59  5 [] {+} -enduringthing_localized(A)|spatialthing_nonsituational(A).
% 0.42/0.59  6 [] {+} -partiallytangible(A)|enduringthing_localized(A).
% 0.42/0.59  7 [] {+} -geographicalregion(A)|partiallytangible(A).
% 0.42/0.59  40 [] {+} -spatialthing_nonsituational(A)|inregion(A,A).
% 0.42/0.59  46 [] {+} -mtvisible(A)| -genlmt(A,B)|mtvisible(B).
% 0.42/0.59  51 [] {+} -inregion(A,c_georegion_l4_x75_y75).
% 0.42/0.59  57 [] {+} genlmt(c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt,c_worldgeographymt).
% 0.42/0.59  58 [] {+} genlmt(c_tptpgeo_member8_mt,c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt).
% 0.42/0.59  65 [] {+} mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member8_mt).
% 0.42/0.59  77 [hyper,58,46,65] {+} mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt).
% 0.42/0.59  80 [hyper,77,46,57] {-} mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt).
% 0.42/0.59  82 [hyper,80,3] {-} geolevel_4(c_georegion_l4_x75_y75).
% 0.42/0.59  84 [hyper,82,4] {-} geographicalregion(c_georegion_l4_x75_y75).
% 0.42/0.59  86 [hyper,84,7] {-} partiallytangible(c_georegion_l4_x75_y75).
% 0.42/0.59  90 [hyper,86,6] {-} enduringthing_localized(c_georegion_l4_x75_y75).
% 0.42/0.59  92 [hyper,90,5] {-} spatialthing_nonsituational(c_georegion_l4_x75_y75).
% 0.42/0.59  93 [hyper,92,40] {-} inregion(c_georegion_l4_x75_y75,c_georegion_l4_x75_y75).
% 0.42/0.59  94 [binary,93.1,51.1] {-} $F.
% 0.42/0.59  
% 0.42/0.59  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.42/0.59  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 0.42/0.59  
% 0.42/0.59  
% 0.42/0.59  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.42/0.59  
% 0.42/0.59  
% 0.42/0.59  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.42/0.59  
% 0.42/0.59  ============ end of search ============
% 0.42/0.59  
% 0.42/0.59  ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 0.42/0.59  
% 0.42/0.59  true clauses given           3      (15.8%)
% 0.42/0.59  false clauses given         16
% 0.42/0.59  
% 0.42/0.59        FALSE     TRUE
% 0.42/0.59     2  0         8
% 0.42/0.59     3  5         9
% 0.42/0.59  tot:  5         17      (77.3% true)
% 0.42/0.59  
% 0.42/0.59  
% 0.42/0.59  Model 11 [ 1 -8 171 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.42/0.59  
% 0.42/0.59  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 0.42/0.59  
% 0.42/0.59  Process 32723 finished Sat Jun 11 03:22:47 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------