TSTP Solution File: CSR057+1 by Enigma---0.5.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : CSR057+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 02:47:09 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 6.98s 2.14s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 6.98s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :   11
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   30 (  14 unt;   0 nHn;  30 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   48 (   0 equ;  21 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    9 (   8 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   4 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   18 (   2 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_93,plain,
    ( mtvisible(X1)
    | ~ mtvisible(X2)
    | ~ genlmt(X2,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-tmeif202/input.p',i_0_93) ).

cnf(i_0_7,plain,
    genlmt(c_tptpgeo_member8_mt,c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-tmeif202/input.p',i_0_7) ).

cnf(i_0_103,negated_conjecture,
    mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member8_mt),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-tmeif202/input.p',i_0_103) ).

cnf(i_0_6,plain,
    genlmt(c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt,c_worldgeographymt),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-tmeif202/input.p',i_0_6) ).

cnf(i_0_19,plain,
    ( enduringthing_localized(X1)
    | ~ partiallytangible(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-tmeif202/input.p',i_0_19) ).

cnf(i_0_23,plain,
    ( partiallytangible(X1)
    | ~ geographicalregion(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-tmeif202/input.p',i_0_23) ).

cnf(i_0_10,plain,
    ( geolevel_4(c_georegion_l4_x75_y75)
    | ~ mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-tmeif202/input.p',i_0_10) ).

cnf(i_0_17,plain,
    ( spatialthing_nonsituational(X1)
    | ~ enduringthing_localized(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-tmeif202/input.p',i_0_17) ).

cnf(i_0_12,plain,
    ( geographicalregion(X1)
    | ~ geolevel_4(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-tmeif202/input.p',i_0_12) ).

cnf(i_0_102,negated_conjecture,
    ~ inregion(X1,c_georegion_l4_x75_y75),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-tmeif202/input.p',i_0_102) ).

cnf(i_0_84,plain,
    ( inregion(X1,X1)
    | ~ spatialthing_nonsituational(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-tmeif202/input.p',i_0_84) ).

cnf(c_0_115,plain,
    ( mtvisible(X1)
    | ~ mtvisible(X2)
    | ~ genlmt(X2,X1) ),
    i_0_93 ).

cnf(c_0_116,plain,
    genlmt(c_tptpgeo_member8_mt,c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt),
    i_0_7 ).

cnf(c_0_117,negated_conjecture,
    mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member8_mt),
    i_0_103 ).

cnf(c_0_118,plain,
    genlmt(c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt,c_worldgeographymt),
    i_0_6 ).

cnf(c_0_119,plain,
    mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_115,c_0_116]),c_0_117])]) ).

cnf(c_0_120,plain,
    ( enduringthing_localized(X1)
    | ~ partiallytangible(X1) ),
    i_0_19 ).

cnf(c_0_121,plain,
    ( partiallytangible(X1)
    | ~ geographicalregion(X1) ),
    i_0_23 ).

cnf(c_0_122,plain,
    ( geolevel_4(c_georegion_l4_x75_y75)
    | ~ mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt) ),
    i_0_10 ).

cnf(c_0_123,plain,
    mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_115,c_0_118]),c_0_119])]) ).

cnf(c_0_124,plain,
    ( spatialthing_nonsituational(X1)
    | ~ enduringthing_localized(X1) ),
    i_0_17 ).

cnf(c_0_125,plain,
    ( enduringthing_localized(X1)
    | ~ geographicalregion(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_120,c_0_121]) ).

cnf(c_0_126,plain,
    ( geographicalregion(X1)
    | ~ geolevel_4(X1) ),
    i_0_12 ).

cnf(c_0_127,plain,
    geolevel_4(c_georegion_l4_x75_y75),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_122,c_0_123])]) ).

cnf(c_0_128,negated_conjecture,
    ~ inregion(X1,c_georegion_l4_x75_y75),
    i_0_102 ).

cnf(c_0_129,plain,
    ( inregion(X1,X1)
    | ~ spatialthing_nonsituational(X1) ),
    i_0_84 ).

cnf(c_0_130,plain,
    ( spatialthing_nonsituational(X1)
    | ~ geographicalregion(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_124,c_0_125]) ).

cnf(c_0_131,plain,
    geographicalregion(c_georegion_l4_x75_y75),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_126,c_0_127]) ).

cnf(c_0_132,negated_conjecture,
    ~ spatialthing_nonsituational(c_georegion_l4_x75_y75),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_128,c_0_129]) ).

cnf(c_0_133,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_130,c_0_131]),c_0_132]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.11  % Problem  : CSR057+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.03/0.12  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.13/0.32  % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.32  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.32  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.32  % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 03:25:13 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.32  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.18/0.44  # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 6.98/2.14  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule:
% 6.98/2.14  # No SInE strategy applied
% 6.98/2.14  # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 6.98/2.14  # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___006_C18_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_S2S
% 6.98/2.14  # and selection function SelectNewComplexAHP.
% 6.98/2.14  #
% 6.98/2.14  # Preprocessing time       : 0.025 s
% 6.98/2.14  
% 6.98/2.14  # Proof found!
% 6.98/2.14  # SZS status Theorem
% 6.98/2.14  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 6.98/2.14  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 6.98/2.14  
% 6.98/2.14  # -------------------------------------------------
% 6.98/2.14  # User time                : 0.028 s
% 6.98/2.14  # System time              : 0.004 s
% 6.98/2.14  # Total time               : 0.032 s
% 6.98/2.14  # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 6.98/2.14  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------