TSTP Solution File: CSR056+3 by E---3.1.00

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.1.00
% Problem  : CSR056+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sat May  4 07:31:50 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 1.53s 1.89s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.53s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   27 (  11 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   49 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   39 (  17   ~;  13   |;   3   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   6  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   5 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   5 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   17 (   1 sgn   9   !;   2   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query156,conjecture,
    ? [X23] :
      ( mtvisible(c_tptp_member3717_mt)
     => tptpofobject(c_tptpartsupplies,X23) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.WxANPcTtw3/E---3.1_13111.p',query156) ).

fof(ax2_7997,axiom,
    ! [X21,X22] :
      ( ( mtvisible(X21)
        & genlmt(X21,X22) )
     => mtvisible(X22) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.WxANPcTtw3/E---3.1_13111.p',ax2_7997) ).

fof(ax2_856,axiom,
    genlmt(c_tptp_member3717_mt,c_tptp_spindleheadmt),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.WxANPcTtw3/E---3.1_13111.p',ax2_856) ).

fof(ax2_360,axiom,
    ! [X2] :
      ( ( mtvisible(c_tptp_spindleheadmt)
        & supplies(X2) )
     => tptpofobject(X2,f_tptpquantityfn_14(n_232)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.WxANPcTtw3/E---3.1_13111.p',ax2_360) ).

fof(ax2_1986,axiom,
    ( mtvisible(c_cyclistsmt)
   => artsupplies(c_tptpartsupplies) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.WxANPcTtw3/E---3.1_13111.p',ax2_1986) ).

fof(ax2_4288,axiom,
    genlmt(c_tptp_spindleheadmt,c_cyclistsmt),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.WxANPcTtw3/E---3.1_13111.p',ax2_4288) ).

fof(ax2_1480,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( artsupplies(X1)
     => supplies(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.WxANPcTtw3/E---3.1_13111.p',ax2_1480) ).

fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ? [X23] :
        ( mtvisible(c_tptp_member3717_mt)
       => tptpofobject(c_tptpartsupplies,X23) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query156]) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X29,X30] :
      ( ~ mtvisible(X29)
      | ~ genlmt(X29,X30)
      | mtvisible(X30) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax2_7997])])]) ).

fof(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X24] :
      ( mtvisible(c_tptp_member3717_mt)
      & ~ tptpofobject(c_tptpartsupplies,X24) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( mtvisible(X2)
    | ~ mtvisible(X1)
    | ~ genlmt(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    genlmt(c_tptp_member3717_mt,c_tptp_spindleheadmt),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax2_856]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    mtvisible(c_tptp_member3717_mt),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

fof(c_0_13,plain,
    ! [X80] :
      ( ~ mtvisible(c_tptp_spindleheadmt)
      | ~ supplies(X80)
      | tptpofobject(X80,f_tptpquantityfn_14(n_232)) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax2_360])])]) ).

fof(c_0_14,plain,
    ( ~ mtvisible(c_cyclistsmt)
    | artsupplies(c_tptpartsupplies) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax2_1986])]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    genlmt(c_tptp_spindleheadmt,c_cyclistsmt),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax2_4288]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    mtvisible(c_tptp_spindleheadmt),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_12])]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( tptpofobject(X1,f_tptpquantityfn_14(n_232))
    | ~ mtvisible(c_tptp_spindleheadmt)
    | ~ supplies(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

fof(c_0_18,plain,
    ! [X62] :
      ( ~ artsupplies(X62)
      | supplies(X62) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax2_1480])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( artsupplies(c_tptpartsupplies)
    | ~ mtvisible(c_cyclistsmt) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    mtvisible(c_cyclistsmt),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_15]),c_0_16])]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    ~ tptpofobject(c_tptpartsupplies,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( tptpofobject(X1,f_tptpquantityfn_14(n_232))
    | ~ supplies(X1) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_16])]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( supplies(X1)
    | ~ artsupplies(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    artsupplies(c_tptpartsupplies),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20])]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    ~ supplies(c_tptpartsupplies),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]),c_0_25]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.72/0.79  % Problem    : CSR056+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.79/0.79  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.79/0.98  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.79/0.98  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.79/0.98  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.79/0.98  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.79/0.98  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.79/0.98  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.79/0.98  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.79/0.98  % DateTime   : Fri May  3 14:53:17 EDT 2024
% 0.79/0.98  % CPUTime    : 
% 1.45/1.68  Running first-order theorem proving
% 1.45/1.68  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.WxANPcTtw3/E---3.1_13111.p
% 1.53/1.89  # Version: 3.1.0
% 1.53/1.89  # Preprocessing class: FMLLMMSLSSSNFFN.
% 1.53/1.89  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.53/1.89  # Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.53/1.89  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.53/1.89  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.53/1.89  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 1.53/1.89  # sh5l with pid 13193 completed with status 0
% 1.53/1.89  # Result found by sh5l
% 1.53/1.89  # Preprocessing class: FMLLMMSLSSSNFFN.
% 1.53/1.89  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.53/1.89  # Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.53/1.89  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.53/1.89  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.53/1.89  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 1.53/1.89  # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 1.53/1.89  # Search class: FHHNM-FSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 1.53/1.89  # partial match(1): FHHNM-SSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 1.53/1.89  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 1.53/1.89  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d with 181s (1) cores
% 1.53/1.89  # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d with pid 13199 completed with status 0
% 1.53/1.89  # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d
% 1.53/1.89  # Preprocessing class: FMLLMMSLSSSNFFN.
% 1.53/1.89  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.53/1.89  # Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.53/1.89  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.53/1.89  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.53/1.89  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 1.53/1.89  # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 1.53/1.89  # Search class: FHHNM-FSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 1.53/1.89  # partial match(1): FHHNM-SSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 1.53/1.89  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 1.53/1.89  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d with 181s (1) cores
% 1.53/1.89  # Preprocessing time       : 0.012 s
% 1.53/1.89  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 1.53/1.89  
% 1.53/1.89  # Proof found!
% 1.53/1.89  # SZS status Theorem
% 1.53/1.89  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.53/1.89  # Parsed axioms                        : 8006
% 1.53/1.89  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 7287
% 1.53/1.89  # Initial clauses                      : 720
% 1.53/1.89  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 1.53/1.89  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 720
% 1.53/1.89  # Processed clauses                    : 1459
% 1.53/1.89  # ...of these trivial                  : 85
% 1.53/1.89  # ...subsumed                          : 74
% 1.53/1.89  # ...remaining for further processing  : 1300
% 1.53/1.89  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 1.53/1.89  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 1.53/1.89  # Backward-subsumed                    : 1
% 1.53/1.89  # Backward-rewritten                   : 7
% 1.53/1.89  # Generated clauses                    : 672
% 1.53/1.89  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 559
% 1.53/1.89  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 1.53/1.89  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 1.53/1.89  # Paramodulations                      : 672
% 1.53/1.89  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 1.53/1.89  # NegExts                              : 0
% 1.53/1.89  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 1.53/1.89  # Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 1.53/1.89  # Total rewrite steps                  : 204
% 1.53/1.89  # ...of those cached                   : 99
% 1.53/1.89  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 1.53/1.89  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 1.53/1.89  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 1.53/1.89  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 1.53/1.89  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 1.53/1.89  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 1.53/1.89  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 1.53/1.89  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 1.53/1.89  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 1.53/1.89  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 1.53/1.89  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 1.53/1.89  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 1.53/1.89  # Current number of processed clauses  : 702
% 1.53/1.89  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 327
% 1.53/1.89  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 1.53/1.89  #    Negative unit clauses             : 8
% 1.53/1.89  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 367
% 1.53/1.89  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 408
% 1.53/1.89  # ...number of literals in the above   : 661
% 1.53/1.89  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 1.53/1.89  # Current number of archived clauses   : 598
% 1.53/1.89  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 24042
% 1.53/1.89  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 22073
% 1.53/1.89  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 75
% 1.53/1.89  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1478
% 1.53/1.89  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 1.53/1.89  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 1
% 1.53/1.89  # BW rewrite match successes           : 1
% 1.53/1.89  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 1.53/1.89  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 1.53/1.89  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 86669
% 1.53/1.89  # Search garbage collected termcells   : 32021
% 1.53/1.89  
% 1.53/1.89  # -------------------------------------------------
% 1.53/1.89  # User time                : 0.096 s
% 1.53/1.89  # System time              : 0.032 s
% 1.53/1.89  # Total time               : 0.128 s
% 1.53/1.89  # Maximum resident set size: 18672 pages
% 1.53/1.89  
% 1.53/1.89  # -------------------------------------------------
% 1.53/1.89  # User time                : 0.157 s
% 1.53/1.89  # System time              : 0.043 s
% 1.53/1.89  # Total time               : 0.200 s
% 1.53/1.89  # Maximum resident set size: 8068 pages
% 1.53/1.89  % E---3.1 exiting
% 1.53/1.89  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------