TSTP Solution File: CSR054+3 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : CSR054+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 03:01:54 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.81s 1.99s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.81s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 9 ( 3 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 15 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 11 ( 5 ~; 2 |; 1 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 3 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 4 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 5 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 4 ( 1 sgn 1 !; 2 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query154,conjecture,
? [X15] :
( mtvisible(c_currentworlddatacollectormt_nonhomocentric)
=> tptpofobject(f_instancewithrelationtofn(c_airport_physical,c_airporthasiatacode,s_tlh),X15) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',query154) ).
fof(ax2_3985,axiom,
( mtvisible(c_currentworlddatacollectormt_nonhomocentric)
=> tptpofobject(f_instancewithrelationtofn(c_airport_physical,c_airporthasiatacode,s_tlh),f_tptpquantityfn_21(n_170)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_3985) ).
fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X15] :
( mtvisible(c_currentworlddatacollectormt_nonhomocentric)
=> tptpofobject(f_instancewithrelationtofn(c_airport_physical,c_airporthasiatacode,s_tlh),X15) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query154]) ).
fof(c_0_3,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_currentworlddatacollectormt_nonhomocentric)
| tptpofobject(f_instancewithrelationtofn(c_airport_physical,c_airporthasiatacode,s_tlh),f_tptpquantityfn_21(n_170)) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax2_3985]) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
! [X16] :
( mtvisible(c_currentworlddatacollectormt_nonhomocentric)
& ~ tptpofobject(f_instancewithrelationtofn(c_airport_physical,c_airporthasiatacode,s_tlh),X16) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,plain,
( tptpofobject(f_instancewithrelationtofn(c_airport_physical,c_airporthasiatacode,s_tlh),f_tptpquantityfn_21(n_170))
| ~ mtvisible(c_currentworlddatacollectormt_nonhomocentric) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_currentworlddatacollectormt_nonhomocentric),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
~ tptpofobject(f_instancewithrelationtofn(c_airport_physical,c_airporthasiatacode,s_tlh),X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6])]),c_0_7]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11 % Problem : CSR054+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.12/0.12 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.12/0.32 % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.32 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.32 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.32 % DateTime : Fri Jun 10 21:54:54 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.81/1.99 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.81/1.99 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.81/1.99 # Preprocessing time : 0.148 s
% 0.81/1.99
% 0.81/1.99 # Failure: Out of unprocessed clauses!
% 0.81/1.99 # OLD status GaveUp
% 0.81/1.99 # Parsed axioms : 8006
% 0.81/1.99 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 7924
% 0.81/1.99 # Initial clauses : 83
% 0.81/1.99 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.81/1.99 # Initial clauses in saturation : 83
% 0.81/1.99 # Processed clauses : 87
% 0.81/1.99 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.81/1.99 # ...subsumed : 15
% 0.81/1.99 # ...remaining for further processing : 72
% 0.81/1.99 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.81/1.99 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.81/1.99 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.81/1.99 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.81/1.99 # Generated clauses : 10
% 0.81/1.99 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 4
% 0.81/1.99 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.81/1.99 # Paramodulations : 10
% 0.81/1.99 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.81/1.99 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.81/1.99 # Current number of processed clauses : 72
% 0.81/1.99 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 44
% 0.81/1.99 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.81/1.99 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.81/1.99 # Non-unit-clauses : 27
% 0.81/1.99 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.81/1.99 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.81/1.99 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.81/1.99 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.81/1.99 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 169
% 0.81/1.99 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 130
% 0.81/1.99 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 15
% 0.81/1.99 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 7
% 0.81/1.99 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.81/1.99 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.81/1.99 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.81/1.99 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.81/1.99 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.81/1.99 # Termbank termtop insertions : 54765
% 0.81/1.99
% 0.81/1.99 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.81/1.99 # User time : 0.130 s
% 0.81/1.99 # System time : 0.020 s
% 0.81/1.99 # Total time : 0.150 s
% 0.81/1.99 # Maximum resident set size: 19756 pages
% 0.81/1.99 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_f171197f65f27d1ba69648a20c844832c84a5dd7 for 23 seconds:
% 0.81/1.99 # Preprocessing time : 0.213 s
% 0.81/1.99
% 0.81/1.99 # Proof found!
% 0.81/1.99 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.81/1.99 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.81/1.99 # Proof object total steps : 9
% 0.81/1.99 # Proof object clause steps : 4
% 0.81/1.99 # Proof object formula steps : 5
% 0.81/1.99 # Proof object conjectures : 5
% 0.81/1.99 # Proof object clause conjectures : 2
% 0.81/1.99 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.81/1.99 # Proof object initial clauses used : 3
% 0.81/1.99 # Proof object initial formulas used : 2
% 0.81/1.99 # Proof object generating inferences : 0
% 0.81/1.99 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 3
% 0.81/1.99 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.81/1.99 # Parsed axioms : 8006
% 0.81/1.99 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.81/1.99 # Initial clauses : 8007
% 0.81/1.99 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.81/1.99 # Initial clauses in saturation : 8007
% 0.81/1.99 # Processed clauses : 5496
% 0.81/1.99 # ...of these trivial : 319
% 0.81/1.99 # ...subsumed : 277
% 0.81/1.99 # ...remaining for further processing : 4899
% 0.81/1.99 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.81/1.99 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.81/1.99 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.81/1.99 # Backward-rewritten : 19
% 0.81/1.99 # Generated clauses : 6342
% 0.81/1.99 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 5895
% 0.81/1.99 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 10
% 0.81/1.99 # Paramodulations : 6342
% 0.81/1.99 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.81/1.99 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.81/1.99 # Current number of processed clauses : 4880
% 0.81/1.99 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 2665
% 0.81/1.99 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.81/1.99 # Negative unit clauses : 34
% 0.81/1.99 # Non-unit-clauses : 2181
% 0.81/1.99 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 8406
% 0.81/1.99 # ...number of literals in the above : 12389
% 0.81/1.99 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.81/1.99 # Current number of archived clauses : 19
% 0.81/1.99 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 685556
% 0.81/1.99 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 631558
% 0.81/1.99 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 287
% 0.81/1.99 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 7500
% 0.81/1.99 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.81/1.99 # BW rewrite match attempts : 2554
% 0.81/1.99 # BW rewrite match successes : 19
% 0.81/1.99 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.81/1.99 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.81/1.99 # Termbank termtop insertions : 339097
% 0.81/1.99
% 0.81/1.99 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.81/1.99 # User time : 0.400 s
% 0.81/1.99 # System time : 0.020 s
% 0.81/1.99 # Total time : 0.420 s
% 0.81/1.99 # Maximum resident set size: 49144 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------