TSTP Solution File: CSR054+1 by Princess---230619
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Princess---230619
% Problem : CSR054+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp
% Command : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s
% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 30 21:36:54 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 6.66s 1.63s
% Output : Proof 8.77s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12 % Problem : CSR054+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.12/0.13 % Command : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Aug 28 12:53:17 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.60 ________ _____
% 0.19/0.60 ___ __ \_________(_)________________________________
% 0.19/0.60 __ /_/ /_ ___/_ /__ __ \ ___/ _ \_ ___/_ ___/
% 0.19/0.60 _ ____/_ / _ / _ / / / /__ / __/(__ )_(__ )
% 0.19/0.60 /_/ /_/ /_/ /_/ /_/\___/ \___//____/ /____/
% 0.19/0.60
% 0.19/0.60 A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic modulo Linear Integer Arithmetic
% 0.19/0.60 (2023-06-19)
% 0.19/0.60
% 0.19/0.60 (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2023
% 0.19/0.60 Contributors: Peter Backeman, Peter Baumgartner, Angelo Brillout, Zafer Esen,
% 0.19/0.60 Amanda Stjerna.
% 0.19/0.60 Free software under BSD-3-Clause.
% 0.19/0.60
% 0.19/0.60 For more information, visit http://www.philipp.ruemmer.org/princess.shtml
% 0.19/0.60
% 0.19/0.60 Loading /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 0.19/0.61 Running up to 7 provers in parallel.
% 0.19/0.63 Prover 0: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1042961893
% 0.19/0.63 Prover 1: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1571432423
% 0.19/0.63 Prover 2: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimalAndEmpty -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1065072994
% 0.19/0.63 Prover 3: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1922548996
% 0.19/0.63 Prover 4: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1868514696
% 0.19/0.63 Prover 6: Options: -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximalOutermost -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1399714365
% 0.19/0.63 Prover 5: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1259561288
% 2.90/1.08 Prover 4: Preprocessing ...
% 2.90/1.08 Prover 1: Preprocessing ...
% 2.90/1.12 Prover 5: Preprocessing ...
% 2.90/1.12 Prover 6: Preprocessing ...
% 2.90/1.12 Prover 2: Preprocessing ...
% 2.90/1.13 Prover 0: Preprocessing ...
% 2.90/1.13 Prover 3: Preprocessing ...
% 5.56/1.47 Prover 5: Proving ...
% 5.56/1.48 Prover 2: Proving ...
% 5.56/1.52 Prover 1: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 6.32/1.55 Prover 6: Proving ...
% 6.32/1.57 Prover 3: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 6.32/1.58 Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ...
% 6.32/1.59 Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ...
% 6.66/1.62 Prover 2: proved (1007ms)
% 6.66/1.63
% 6.66/1.63 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 6.66/1.63
% 6.66/1.63 Prover 3: stopped
% 6.66/1.63 Prover 7: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-236303470
% 6.66/1.63 Prover 8: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-200781089
% 6.66/1.63 Prover 6: stopped
% 6.66/1.64 Prover 5: stopped
% 6.66/1.64 Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ...
% 6.66/1.64 Prover 10: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=919308125
% 6.66/1.64 Prover 11: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1509710984
% 6.66/1.64 Prover 0: Proving ...
% 7.02/1.65 Prover 0: stopped
% 7.02/1.65 Prover 13: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1138197443
% 7.02/1.70 Prover 8: Preprocessing ...
% 7.02/1.70 Prover 7: Preprocessing ...
% 7.44/1.71 Prover 10: Preprocessing ...
% 7.44/1.71 Prover 13: Preprocessing ...
% 7.44/1.73 Prover 11: Preprocessing ...
% 7.81/1.76 Prover 7: Constructing countermodel ...
% 7.81/1.79 Prover 1: gave up
% 7.81/1.79 Prover 4: Found proof (size 16)
% 7.81/1.79 Prover 4: proved (1167ms)
% 7.81/1.79 Prover 7: stopped
% 7.81/1.79 Prover 16: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=completeFrugal -randomSeed=-2043353683
% 7.81/1.79 Prover 13: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 7.81/1.80 Prover 10: Constructing countermodel ...
% 7.81/1.80 Prover 11: stopped
% 7.81/1.81 Prover 13: Constructing countermodel ...
% 7.81/1.81 Prover 10: stopped
% 7.81/1.81 Prover 13: stopped
% 7.81/1.84 Prover 8: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 7.81/1.84 Prover 16: Preprocessing ...
% 8.52/1.86 Prover 16: stopped
% 8.52/1.86 Prover 8: Constructing countermodel ...
% 8.52/1.87 Prover 8: stopped
% 8.52/1.87
% 8.52/1.87 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 8.52/1.87
% 8.52/1.87 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 8.52/1.88 Assumptions after simplification:
% 8.52/1.88 ---------------------------------
% 8.52/1.88
% 8.52/1.88 (just1)
% 8.77/1.90 $i(n_170) & $i(s_tlh) & $i(c_airporthasiatacode) & $i(c_airport_physical) &
% 8.77/1.91 $i(c_currentworlddatacollectormt_nonhomocentric) & ? [v0: any] : ? [v1: $i]
% 8.77/1.91 : ? [v2: $i] : ? [v3: any] :
% 8.77/1.91 (mtvisible(c_currentworlddatacollectormt_nonhomocentric) = v0 &
% 8.77/1.91 f_instancewithrelationtofn(c_airport_physical, c_airporthasiatacode, s_tlh)
% 8.77/1.91 = v1 & f_tptpquantityfn_21(n_170) = v2 & tptpofobject(v1, v2) = v3 & $i(v2)
% 8.77/1.91 & $i(v1) & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0))
% 8.77/1.91
% 8.77/1.91 (query54)
% 8.77/1.91 $i(s_tlh) & $i(c_airporthasiatacode) & $i(c_airport_physical) &
% 8.77/1.91 $i(c_currentworlddatacollectormt_nonhomocentric) & ? [v0: $i] :
% 8.77/1.91 (mtvisible(c_currentworlddatacollectormt_nonhomocentric) = 0 &
% 8.77/1.91 f_instancewithrelationtofn(c_airport_physical, c_airporthasiatacode, s_tlh)
% 8.77/1.91 = v0 & $i(v0) & ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ (tptpofobject(v0, v1) = 0) | ~ $i(v1)))
% 8.77/1.91
% 8.77/1.91 (function-axioms)
% 8.77/1.92 ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v2: $i] : !
% 8.77/1.92 [v3: $i] : ! [v4: $i] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (natargument(v4, v3, v2) = v1) | ~
% 8.77/1.92 (natargument(v4, v3, v2) = v0)) & ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] :
% 8.77/1.92 ! [v3: $i] : ! [v4: $i] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (f_instancewithrelationtofn(v4, v3,
% 8.77/1.92 v2) = v1) | ~ (f_instancewithrelationtofn(v4, v3, v2) = v0)) & ! [v0:
% 8.77/1.92 MultipleValueBool] : ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v2: $i] : ! [v3: $i]
% 8.77/1.92 : (v1 = v0 | ~ (airporthasiatacode(v3, v2) = v1) | ~ (airporthasiatacode(v3,
% 8.77/1.92 v2) = v0)) & ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] :
% 8.77/1.92 ! [v2: $i] : ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (natfunction(v3, v2) = v1) | ~
% 8.77/1.92 (natfunction(v3, v2) = v0)) & ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v1:
% 8.77/1.92 MultipleValueBool] : ! [v2: $i] : ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (genls(v3,
% 8.77/1.92 v2) = v1) | ~ (genls(v3, v2) = v0)) & ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] : !
% 8.77/1.92 [v1: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v2: $i] : ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 | ~
% 8.77/1.92 (genlpreds(v3, v2) = v1) | ~ (genlpreds(v3, v2) = v0)) & ! [v0:
% 8.77/1.92 MultipleValueBool] : ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v2: $i] : ! [v3: $i]
% 8.77/1.92 : (v1 = v0 | ~ (genlinverse(v3, v2) = v1) | ~ (genlinverse(v3, v2) = v0)) &
% 8.77/1.92 ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v2: $i] : ! [v3:
% 8.77/1.92 $i] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (disjointwith(v3, v2) = v1) | ~ (disjointwith(v3, v2) =
% 8.77/1.92 v0)) & ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v2:
% 8.77/1.92 $i] : ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (isa(v3, v2) = v1) | ~ (isa(v3, v2) =
% 8.77/1.92 v0)) & ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v2:
% 8.77/1.92 $i] : ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (tptpofobject(v3, v2) = v1) | ~
% 8.77/1.92 (tptpofobject(v3, v2) = v0)) & ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v1:
% 8.77/1.92 MultipleValueBool] : ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (partiallytangible(v2) =
% 8.77/1.92 v1) | ~ (partiallytangible(v2) = v0)) & ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] : !
% 8.77/1.92 [v1: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (airport_physical(v2) =
% 8.77/1.92 v1) | ~ (airport_physical(v2) = v0)) & ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] : !
% 8.77/1.92 [v1: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (stringoflengthfn3(v2) =
% 8.77/1.92 v1) | ~ (stringoflengthfn3(v2) = v0)) & ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] : !
% 8.77/1.92 [v1: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (tptpquantity(v2) = v1)
% 8.77/1.92 | ~ (tptpquantity(v2) = v0)) & ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v1:
% 8.77/1.92 MultipleValueBool] : ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (thing(v2) = v1) | ~
% 8.77/1.92 (thing(v2) = v0)) & ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v1: MultipleValueBool]
% 8.77/1.92 : ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (collection(v2) = v1) | ~ (collection(v2) =
% 8.77/1.92 v0)) & ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v2:
% 8.77/1.92 $i] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (binarypredicate(v2) = v1) | ~ (binarypredicate(v2) =
% 8.77/1.92 v0)) & ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v2:
% 8.77/1.92 $i] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (predicate(v2) = v1) | ~ (predicate(v2) = v0)) & !
% 8.77/1.92 [v0: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0
% 8.77/1.92 | ~ (mtvisible(v2) = v1) | ~ (mtvisible(v2) = v0)) & ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1:
% 8.77/1.92 $i] : ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (f_tptpquantityfn_21(v2) = v1) | ~
% 8.77/1.92 (f_tptpquantityfn_21(v2) = v0))
% 8.77/1.92
% 8.77/1.92 Further assumptions not needed in the proof:
% 8.77/1.92 --------------------------------------------
% 8.77/1.92 just10, just11, just12, just13, just14, just15, just16, just17, just18, just19,
% 8.77/1.92 just2, just20, just21, just22, just23, just24, just25, just26, just27, just28,
% 8.77/1.92 just29, just3, just30, just31, just32, just33, just34, just35, just36, just37,
% 8.77/1.92 just38, just39, just4, just5, just6, just7, just8, just9
% 8.77/1.92
% 8.77/1.92 Those formulas are unsatisfiable:
% 8.77/1.92 ---------------------------------
% 8.77/1.92
% 8.77/1.92 Begin of proof
% 8.77/1.92 |
% 8.77/1.92 | ALPHA: (just1) implies:
% 8.77/1.93 | (1) ? [v0: any] : ? [v1: $i] : ? [v2: $i] : ? [v3: any] :
% 8.77/1.93 | (mtvisible(c_currentworlddatacollectormt_nonhomocentric) = v0 &
% 8.77/1.93 | f_instancewithrelationtofn(c_airport_physical, c_airporthasiatacode,
% 8.77/1.93 | s_tlh) = v1 & f_tptpquantityfn_21(n_170) = v2 & tptpofobject(v1,
% 8.77/1.93 | v2) = v3 & $i(v2) & $i(v1) & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0))
% 8.77/1.93 |
% 8.77/1.93 | ALPHA: (query54) implies:
% 8.77/1.93 | (2) ? [v0: $i] : (mtvisible(c_currentworlddatacollectormt_nonhomocentric)
% 8.77/1.93 | = 0 & f_instancewithrelationtofn(c_airport_physical,
% 8.77/1.93 | c_airporthasiatacode, s_tlh) = v0 & $i(v0) & ! [v1: $i] : ( ~
% 8.77/1.93 | (tptpofobject(v0, v1) = 0) | ~ $i(v1)))
% 8.77/1.93 |
% 8.77/1.93 | ALPHA: (function-axioms) implies:
% 8.77/1.93 | (3) ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v2: $i] :
% 8.77/1.93 | (v1 = v0 | ~ (mtvisible(v2) = v1) | ~ (mtvisible(v2) = v0))
% 8.77/1.93 | (4) ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : ! [v3: $i] : ! [v4: $i] :
% 8.77/1.93 | (v1 = v0 | ~ (f_instancewithrelationtofn(v4, v3, v2) = v1) | ~
% 8.77/1.93 | (f_instancewithrelationtofn(v4, v3, v2) = v0))
% 8.77/1.93 |
% 8.77/1.93 | DELTA: instantiating (2) with fresh symbol all_41_0 gives:
% 8.77/1.93 | (5) mtvisible(c_currentworlddatacollectormt_nonhomocentric) = 0 &
% 8.77/1.93 | f_instancewithrelationtofn(c_airport_physical, c_airporthasiatacode,
% 8.77/1.93 | s_tlh) = all_41_0 & $i(all_41_0) & ! [v0: $i] : ( ~
% 8.77/1.93 | (tptpofobject(all_41_0, v0) = 0) | ~ $i(v0))
% 8.77/1.93 |
% 8.77/1.93 | ALPHA: (5) implies:
% 8.77/1.93 | (6) f_instancewithrelationtofn(c_airport_physical, c_airporthasiatacode,
% 8.77/1.93 | s_tlh) = all_41_0
% 8.77/1.93 | (7) mtvisible(c_currentworlddatacollectormt_nonhomocentric) = 0
% 8.77/1.93 | (8) ! [v0: $i] : ( ~ (tptpofobject(all_41_0, v0) = 0) | ~ $i(v0))
% 8.77/1.93 |
% 8.77/1.93 | DELTA: instantiating (1) with fresh symbols all_44_0, all_44_1, all_44_2,
% 8.77/1.93 | all_44_3 gives:
% 8.77/1.93 | (9) mtvisible(c_currentworlddatacollectormt_nonhomocentric) = all_44_3 &
% 8.77/1.93 | f_instancewithrelationtofn(c_airport_physical, c_airporthasiatacode,
% 8.77/1.93 | s_tlh) = all_44_2 & f_tptpquantityfn_21(n_170) = all_44_1 &
% 8.77/1.93 | tptpofobject(all_44_2, all_44_1) = all_44_0 & $i(all_44_1) &
% 8.77/1.93 | $i(all_44_2) & ( ~ (all_44_3 = 0) | all_44_0 = 0)
% 8.77/1.93 |
% 8.77/1.93 | ALPHA: (9) implies:
% 8.77/1.93 | (10) $i(all_44_1)
% 8.77/1.93 | (11) tptpofobject(all_44_2, all_44_1) = all_44_0
% 8.77/1.93 | (12) f_instancewithrelationtofn(c_airport_physical, c_airporthasiatacode,
% 8.77/1.93 | s_tlh) = all_44_2
% 8.77/1.93 | (13) mtvisible(c_currentworlddatacollectormt_nonhomocentric) = all_44_3
% 8.77/1.93 | (14) ~ (all_44_3 = 0) | all_44_0 = 0
% 8.77/1.93 |
% 8.77/1.94 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (4) with all_41_0, all_44_2, s_tlh,
% 8.77/1.94 | c_airporthasiatacode, c_airport_physical, simplifying with (6),
% 8.77/1.94 | (12) gives:
% 8.77/1.94 | (15) all_44_2 = all_41_0
% 8.77/1.94 |
% 8.77/1.94 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (3) with 0, all_44_3,
% 8.77/1.94 | c_currentworlddatacollectormt_nonhomocentric, simplifying with
% 8.77/1.94 | (7), (13) gives:
% 8.77/1.94 | (16) all_44_3 = 0
% 8.77/1.94 |
% 8.77/1.94 | REDUCE: (11), (15) imply:
% 8.77/1.94 | (17) tptpofobject(all_41_0, all_44_1) = all_44_0
% 8.77/1.94 |
% 8.77/1.94 | BETA: splitting (14) gives:
% 8.77/1.94 |
% 8.77/1.94 | Case 1:
% 8.77/1.94 | |
% 8.77/1.94 | | (18) ~ (all_44_3 = 0)
% 8.77/1.94 | |
% 8.77/1.94 | | REDUCE: (16), (18) imply:
% 8.77/1.94 | | (19) $false
% 8.77/1.94 | |
% 8.77/1.94 | | CLOSE: (19) is inconsistent.
% 8.77/1.94 | |
% 8.77/1.94 | Case 2:
% 8.77/1.94 | |
% 8.77/1.94 | | (20) all_44_0 = 0
% 8.77/1.94 | |
% 8.77/1.94 | | REDUCE: (17), (20) imply:
% 8.77/1.94 | | (21) tptpofobject(all_41_0, all_44_1) = 0
% 8.77/1.94 | |
% 8.77/1.94 | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (8) with all_44_1, simplifying with (10), (21)
% 8.77/1.94 | | gives:
% 8.77/1.94 | | (22) $false
% 8.77/1.94 | |
% 8.77/1.94 | | CLOSE: (22) is inconsistent.
% 8.77/1.94 | |
% 8.77/1.94 | End of split
% 8.77/1.94 |
% 8.77/1.94 End of proof
% 8.77/1.94 % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 8.77/1.94
% 8.77/1.94 1342ms
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------