TSTP Solution File: CSR053+4 by Enigma---0.5.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : CSR053+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 02:47:05 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 8.73s 3.67s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 8.73s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    2
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :    7 (   5 unt;   0 nHn;   7 RR)
%            Number of literals    :    9 (   0 equ;   4 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   3 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    0 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_289,plain,
    ( geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x11_y2,c_georegion_l4_x35_y7)
    | ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member1_mt) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-9ezwemze/input.p',i_0_289) ).

cnf(i_0_2746,negated_conjecture,
    mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member1_mt),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-9ezwemze/input.p',i_0_2746) ).

cnf(i_0_2745,negated_conjecture,
    ~ geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x11_y2,c_georegion_l4_x35_y7),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-9ezwemze/input.p',i_0_2745) ).

cnf(c_0_2750,plain,
    ( geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x11_y2,c_georegion_l4_x35_y7)
    | ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member1_mt) ),
    i_0_289 ).

cnf(c_0_2751,negated_conjecture,
    mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member1_mt),
    i_0_2746 ).

cnf(c_0_2752,negated_conjecture,
    ~ geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x11_y2,c_georegion_l4_x35_y7),
    i_0_2745 ).

cnf(c_0_2753,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_2750,c_0_2751])]),c_0_2752]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem  : CSR053+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.11/0.12  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Fri Jun 10 08:35:51 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.18/0.44  # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.82/1.06  # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.82/1.06  # Filter: axfilter_auto   0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   0.p
% 0.82/1.06  # Filter: axfilter_auto   1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   1.p
% 0.82/1.06  # Filter: axfilter_auto   2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   2.p
% 8.73/3.67  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_S0Y:
% 8.73/3.67  # Version: 2.1pre011
% 8.73/3.67  # Preprocessing time       : 0.058 s
% 8.73/3.67  
% 8.73/3.67  # Proof found!
% 8.73/3.67  # SZS status Theorem
% 8.73/3.67  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 8.73/3.67  # Proof object total steps             : 7
% 8.73/3.67  # Proof object clause steps            : 4
% 8.73/3.67  # Proof object formula steps           : 3
% 8.73/3.67  # Proof object conjectures             : 4
% 8.73/3.67  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 2
% 8.73/3.67  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 2
% 8.73/3.67  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 3
% 8.73/3.67  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 3
% 8.73/3.67  # Proof object generating inferences   : 0
% 8.73/3.67  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 3
% 8.73/3.67  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 8.73/3.67  # Parsed axioms                        : 2745
% 8.73/3.67  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 8.73/3.67  # Initial clauses                      : 2745
% 8.73/3.67  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 8.73/3.67  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 2745
% 8.73/3.67  # Processed clauses                    : 13
% 8.73/3.67  # ...of these trivial                  : 2
% 8.73/3.67  # ...subsumed                          : 0
% 8.73/3.67  # ...remaining for further processing  : 10
% 8.73/3.67  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 8.73/3.67  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 8.73/3.67  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 8.73/3.67  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 8.73/3.67  # Generated clauses                    : 0
% 8.73/3.67  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 0
% 8.73/3.67  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 8.73/3.67  # Paramodulations                      : 0
% 8.73/3.67  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 8.73/3.67  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 8.73/3.67  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 8.73/3.67  # Propositional unsat check successes  : 0
% 8.73/3.67  # Current number of processed clauses  : 10
% 8.73/3.67  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 6
% 8.73/3.67  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 8.73/3.67  #    Negative unit clauses             : 2
% 8.73/3.67  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 2
% 8.73/3.67  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 2732
% 8.73/3.67  # ...number of literals in the above   : 4326
% 8.73/3.67  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 8.73/3.67  # Current number of archived clauses   : 0
% 8.73/3.67  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 8.73/3.67  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 8.73/3.67  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 8.73/3.67  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 8.73/3.67  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 8.73/3.67  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 8.73/3.67  # BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 8.73/3.67  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 8.73/3.67  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 8.73/3.67  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 36867
% 8.73/3.67  
% 8.73/3.67  # -------------------------------------------------
% 8.73/3.67  # User time                : 0.053 s
% 8.73/3.67  # System time              : 0.006 s
% 8.73/3.67  # Total time               : 0.059 s
% 8.73/3.67  # ...preprocessing         : 0.058 s
% 8.73/3.67  # ...main loop             : 0.001 s
% 8.73/3.67  # Maximum resident set size: 10512 pages
% 8.73/3.67  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------