TSTP Solution File: CSR053+1 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : CSR053+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:35:58 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 3.01s 1.70s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :   18
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   23 (   4 unt;  16 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   10 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    6 (   3   ~;   1   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   18 (  12   >;   6   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :   13 (  12 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   4 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    0 (;   0   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ isa > geographicalsubregions > genls > genlpreds > genlinverse > disjointwith > thing > predicate > mtvisible > geographicalregion > collection > binarypredicate > #nlpp > c_tptpgeo_member1_mt > c_georegion_l4_x35_y7 > c_georegion_l3_x11_y2 > c_basekb

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff(mtvisible,type,
    mtvisible: $i > $o ).

tff(genls,type,
    genls: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(genlpreds,type,
    genlpreds: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(collection,type,
    collection: $i > $o ).

tff(geographicalregion,type,
    geographicalregion: $i > $o ).

tff(binarypredicate,type,
    binarypredicate: $i > $o ).

tff(geographicalsubregions,type,
    geographicalsubregions: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(isa,type,
    isa: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(c_georegion_l4_x35_y7,type,
    c_georegion_l4_x35_y7: $i ).

tff(predicate,type,
    predicate: $i > $o ).

tff(disjointwith,type,
    disjointwith: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(thing,type,
    thing: $i > $o ).

tff(c_georegion_l3_x11_y2,type,
    c_georegion_l3_x11_y2: $i ).

tff(c_basekb,type,
    c_basekb: $i ).

tff(genlinverse,type,
    genlinverse: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(c_tptpgeo_member1_mt,type,
    c_tptpgeo_member1_mt: $i ).

tff(f_177,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member1_mt)
     => geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x11_y2,c_georegion_l4_x35_y7) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query53) ).

tff(f_37,axiom,
    ( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member1_mt)
   => geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x11_y2,c_georegion_l4_x35_y7) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',just1) ).

tff(c_60,plain,
    ~ geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x11_y2,c_georegion_l4_x35_y7),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_177]) ).

tff(c_62,plain,
    mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member1_mt),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_177]) ).

tff(c_2,plain,
    ( geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x11_y2,c_georegion_l4_x35_y7)
    | ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member1_mt) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_37]) ).

tff(c_64,plain,
    geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x11_y2,c_georegion_l4_x35_y7),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_62,c_2]) ).

tff(c_65,plain,
    $false,
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_60,c_64]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : CSR053+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.00/0.13  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 21:31:39 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 3.01/1.70  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.19/1.71  
% 3.19/1.71  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.19/1.74  
% 3.19/1.74  Inference rules
% 3.19/1.74  ----------------------
% 3.19/1.74  #Ref     : 0
% 3.19/1.74  #Sup     : 0
% 3.19/1.74  #Fact    : 0
% 3.19/1.74  #Define  : 0
% 3.19/1.74  #Split   : 0
% 3.19/1.74  #Chain   : 0
% 3.19/1.74  #Close   : 0
% 3.19/1.74  
% 3.19/1.74  Ordering : KBO
% 3.19/1.74  
% 3.19/1.74  Simplification rules
% 3.19/1.74  ----------------------
% 3.19/1.74  #Subsume      : 30
% 3.19/1.74  #Demod        : 1
% 3.19/1.74  #Tautology    : 0
% 3.19/1.74  #SimpNegUnit  : 1
% 3.19/1.74  #BackRed      : 0
% 3.19/1.74  
% 3.19/1.74  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 3.19/1.74  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 3.19/1.74  
% 3.19/1.74  Timing (in seconds)
% 3.19/1.74  ----------------------
% 3.19/1.74  Preprocessing        : 0.51
% 3.19/1.74  Parsing              : 0.29
% 3.19/1.74  CNF conversion       : 0.03
% 3.19/1.74  Main loop            : 0.10
% 3.19/1.74  Inferencing          : 0.00
% 3.19/1.74  Reduction            : 0.04
% 3.19/1.74  Demodulation         : 0.03
% 3.19/1.75  BG Simplification    : 0.02
% 3.19/1.75  Subsumption          : 0.04
% 3.19/1.75  Abstraction          : 0.01
% 3.19/1.75  MUC search           : 0.00
% 3.19/1.75  Cooper               : 0.00
% 3.19/1.75  Total                : 0.67
% 3.19/1.75  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 3.19/1.75  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 3.19/1.75  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 3.19/1.75  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------