TSTP Solution File: CSR052+2 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : CSR052+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 03:01:52 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.27s 1.45s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.27s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 10
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 37 ( 23 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 54 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 36 ( 19 ~; 12 |; 2 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 3 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 14 ( 14 usr; 11 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 17 ( 0 sgn 6 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query102,conjecture,
( mtvisible(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_ukencartamsncomencyclopedia_761573010_4united_states_of_americahtml)),c_translation_33))
=> genls(c_tptpcol_15_40430,c_tptpcol_7_39939) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',query102) ).
fof(ax1_1109,axiom,
! [X13,X14,X19] :
( ( genls(X13,X14)
& genls(X14,X19) )
=> genls(X13,X19) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_1109) ).
fof(ax1_438,axiom,
genls(c_tptpcol_8_39940,c_tptpcol_7_39939),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_438) ).
fof(ax1_54,axiom,
genls(c_tptpcol_12_40420,c_tptpcol_11_40388),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_54) ).
fof(ax1_470,axiom,
genls(c_tptpcol_9_40196,c_tptpcol_8_39940),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_470) ).
fof(ax1_16,axiom,
genls(c_tptpcol_13_40421,c_tptpcol_12_40420),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_16) ).
fof(ax1_76,axiom,
genls(c_tptpcol_10_40324,c_tptpcol_9_40196),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_76) ).
fof(ax1_186,axiom,
genls(c_tptpcol_14_40429,c_tptpcol_13_40421),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_186) ).
fof(ax1_424,axiom,
genls(c_tptpcol_11_40388,c_tptpcol_10_40324),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_424) ).
fof(ax1_4,axiom,
genls(c_tptpcol_15_40430,c_tptpcol_14_40429),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_4) ).
fof(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
~ ( mtvisible(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_ukencartamsncomencyclopedia_761573010_4united_states_of_americahtml)),c_translation_33))
=> genls(c_tptpcol_15_40430,c_tptpcol_7_39939) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query102]) ).
fof(c_0_11,plain,
! [X20,X21,X22] :
( ~ genls(X20,X21)
| ~ genls(X21,X22)
| genls(X20,X22) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax1_1109])]) ).
fof(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
( mtvisible(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_ukencartamsncomencyclopedia_761573010_4united_states_of_americahtml)),c_translation_33))
& ~ genls(c_tptpcol_15_40430,c_tptpcol_7_39939) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( genls(X1,X2)
| ~ genls(X3,X2)
| ~ genls(X1,X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
genls(c_tptpcol_8_39940,c_tptpcol_7_39939),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax1_438]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
genls(c_tptpcol_12_40420,c_tptpcol_11_40388),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax1_54]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
~ genls(c_tptpcol_15_40430,c_tptpcol_7_39939),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( genls(X1,c_tptpcol_7_39939)
| ~ genls(X1,c_tptpcol_8_39940) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
genls(c_tptpcol_9_40196,c_tptpcol_8_39940),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax1_470]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( genls(X1,c_tptpcol_11_40388)
| ~ genls(X1,c_tptpcol_12_40420) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
genls(c_tptpcol_13_40421,c_tptpcol_12_40420),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax1_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
~ genls(c_tptpcol_15_40430,c_tptpcol_8_39940),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
( genls(X1,c_tptpcol_8_39940)
| ~ genls(X1,c_tptpcol_9_40196) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
genls(c_tptpcol_10_40324,c_tptpcol_9_40196),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax1_76]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
genls(c_tptpcol_13_40421,c_tptpcol_11_40388),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
genls(c_tptpcol_14_40429,c_tptpcol_13_40421),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax1_186]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
~ genls(c_tptpcol_15_40430,c_tptpcol_9_40196),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
( genls(X1,c_tptpcol_9_40196)
| ~ genls(X1,c_tptpcol_10_40324) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_23]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
genls(c_tptpcol_11_40388,c_tptpcol_10_40324),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax1_424]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
( genls(X1,c_tptpcol_11_40388)
| ~ genls(X1,c_tptpcol_13_40421) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_24]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
( genls(X1,c_tptpcol_13_40421)
| ~ genls(X1,c_tptpcol_14_40429) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_25]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
~ genls(c_tptpcol_15_40430,c_tptpcol_10_40324),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,plain,
( genls(X1,c_tptpcol_10_40324)
| ~ genls(X1,c_tptpcol_11_40388) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_28]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,plain,
( genls(X1,c_tptpcol_11_40388)
| ~ genls(X1,c_tptpcol_14_40429) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]) ).
cnf(c_0_34,plain,
genls(c_tptpcol_15_40430,c_tptpcol_14_40429),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax1_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
~ genls(c_tptpcol_15_40430,c_tptpcol_11_40388),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]) ).
cnf(c_0_36,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_34]),c_0_35]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12 % Problem : CSR052+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.06/0.13 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Fri Jun 10 14:33:06 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.27/1.45 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.27/1.45 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.27/1.45 # Preprocessing time : 0.032 s
% 0.27/1.45
% 0.27/1.45 # Proof found!
% 0.27/1.45 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.27/1.45 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.27/1.45 # Proof object total steps : 37
% 0.27/1.45 # Proof object clause steps : 24
% 0.27/1.45 # Proof object formula steps : 13
% 0.27/1.45 # Proof object conjectures : 8
% 0.27/1.45 # Proof object clause conjectures : 5
% 0.27/1.45 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.27/1.45 # Proof object initial clauses used : 10
% 0.27/1.45 # Proof object initial formulas used : 10
% 0.27/1.45 # Proof object generating inferences : 14
% 0.27/1.45 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 1
% 0.27/1.45 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.27/1.45 # Parsed axioms : 1132
% 0.27/1.45 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 1073
% 0.27/1.45 # Initial clauses : 60
% 0.27/1.45 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Initial clauses in saturation : 60
% 0.27/1.45 # Processed clauses : 120
% 0.27/1.45 # ...of these trivial : 7
% 0.27/1.45 # ...subsumed : 15
% 0.27/1.45 # ...remaining for further processing : 98
% 0.27/1.45 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Generated clauses : 178
% 0.27/1.45 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 103
% 0.27/1.45 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Paramodulations : 178
% 0.27/1.45 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Current number of processed clauses : 98
% 0.27/1.45 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 41
% 0.27/1.45 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Negative unit clauses : 5
% 0.27/1.45 # Non-unit-clauses : 52
% 0.27/1.45 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 43
% 0.27/1.45 # ...number of literals in the above : 102
% 0.27/1.45 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 120
% 0.27/1.45 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 117
% 0.27/1.45 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 14
% 0.27/1.45 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 38
% 0.27/1.45 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Termbank termtop insertions : 10920
% 0.27/1.45
% 0.27/1.45 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.27/1.45 # User time : 0.035 s
% 0.27/1.45 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.27/1.45 # Total time : 0.037 s
% 0.27/1.45 # Maximum resident set size: 5488 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------