TSTP Solution File: CSR050+3 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : CSR050+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 02:47:02 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 10.73s 3.42s
% Output : CNFRefutation 10.73s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 9
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 24 ( 16 unt; 0 nHn; 24 RR)
% Number of literals : 34 ( 0 equ; 16 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 5 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 13 ( 13 usr; 9 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 12 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_2495,negated_conjecture,
~ tptptypes_7_691(c_tptpcol_16_26939,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtofn(c_ship,c_objectfoundinlocation,c_cityofbostonma)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-rj5sj2yu/input.p',i_0_2495) ).
cnf(i_0_11,plain,
( tptptypes_7_691(X1,X2)
| ~ tptptypes_8_692(X2,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-rj5sj2yu/input.p',i_0_11) ).
cnf(i_0_303,plain,
( tptptypes_8_692(X1,X2)
| ~ tptptypes_9_693(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-rj5sj2yu/input.p',i_0_303) ).
cnf(i_0_97,plain,
( tptptypes_9_693(f_subcollectionofwithrelationtofn(c_ship,c_objectfoundinlocation,c_cityofbostonma),c_tptpcol_16_26939)
| ~ mtvisible(c_currentworlddatacollectormt_nonhomocentric) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-rj5sj2yu/input.p',i_0_97) ).
cnf(i_0_2395,plain,
( mtvisible(X1)
| ~ mtvisible(X2)
| ~ genlmt(X2,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-rj5sj2yu/input.p',i_0_2395) ).
cnf(i_0_14,plain,
genlmt(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_memberstripodcomindygalfordtriviahtm)),c_translation_32),c_machinelearningspindleheadmt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-rj5sj2yu/input.p',i_0_14) ).
cnf(i_0_2496,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_memberstripodcomindygalfordtriviahtm)),c_translation_32)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-rj5sj2yu/input.p',i_0_2496) ).
cnf(i_0_368,plain,
genlmt(c_patternsofglobalterrorism1997mt,c_currentworlddatacollectormt_nonhomocentric),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-rj5sj2yu/input.p',i_0_368) ).
cnf(i_0_308,plain,
genlmt(c_machinelearningspindleheadmt,c_patternsofglobalterrorism1997mt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-rj5sj2yu/input.p',i_0_308) ).
cnf(c_0_2506,negated_conjecture,
~ tptptypes_7_691(c_tptpcol_16_26939,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtofn(c_ship,c_objectfoundinlocation,c_cityofbostonma)),
i_0_2495 ).
cnf(c_0_2507,plain,
( tptptypes_7_691(X1,X2)
| ~ tptptypes_8_692(X2,X1) ),
i_0_11 ).
cnf(c_0_2508,negated_conjecture,
~ tptptypes_8_692(f_subcollectionofwithrelationtofn(c_ship,c_objectfoundinlocation,c_cityofbostonma),c_tptpcol_16_26939),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2506,c_0_2507]) ).
cnf(c_0_2509,plain,
( tptptypes_8_692(X1,X2)
| ~ tptptypes_9_693(X1,X2) ),
i_0_303 ).
cnf(c_0_2510,plain,
~ tptptypes_9_693(f_subcollectionofwithrelationtofn(c_ship,c_objectfoundinlocation,c_cityofbostonma),c_tptpcol_16_26939),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2508,c_0_2509]) ).
cnf(c_0_2511,plain,
( tptptypes_9_693(f_subcollectionofwithrelationtofn(c_ship,c_objectfoundinlocation,c_cityofbostonma),c_tptpcol_16_26939)
| ~ mtvisible(c_currentworlddatacollectormt_nonhomocentric) ),
i_0_97 ).
cnf(c_0_2512,plain,
( mtvisible(X1)
| ~ mtvisible(X2)
| ~ genlmt(X2,X1) ),
i_0_2395 ).
cnf(c_0_2513,plain,
genlmt(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_memberstripodcomindygalfordtriviahtm)),c_translation_32),c_machinelearningspindleheadmt),
i_0_14 ).
cnf(c_0_2514,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_memberstripodcomindygalfordtriviahtm)),c_translation_32)),
i_0_2496 ).
cnf(c_0_2515,plain,
genlmt(c_patternsofglobalterrorism1997mt,c_currentworlddatacollectormt_nonhomocentric),
i_0_368 ).
cnf(c_0_2516,plain,
~ mtvisible(c_currentworlddatacollectormt_nonhomocentric),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2510,c_0_2511]) ).
cnf(c_0_2517,plain,
genlmt(c_machinelearningspindleheadmt,c_patternsofglobalterrorism1997mt),
i_0_308 ).
cnf(c_0_2518,plain,
mtvisible(c_machinelearningspindleheadmt),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2512,c_0_2513]),c_0_2514])]) ).
cnf(c_0_2519,plain,
~ mtvisible(c_patternsofglobalterrorism1997mt),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2512,c_0_2515]),c_0_2516]) ).
cnf(c_0_2520,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2512,c_0_2517]),c_0_2518])]),c_0_2519]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.12 % Problem : CSR050+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.10/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Fri Jun 10 18:32:37 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.44 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.18/0.58 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.58 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.18/0.58 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.18/0.58 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 10.73/3.42 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_S0Y:
% 10.73/3.42 # Version: 2.1pre011
% 10.73/3.42 # Preprocessing time : 0.046 s
% 10.73/3.42
% 10.73/3.42 # Proof found!
% 10.73/3.42 # SZS status Theorem
% 10.73/3.42 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 10.73/3.42 # Proof object total steps : 24
% 10.73/3.42 # Proof object clause steps : 15
% 10.73/3.42 # Proof object formula steps : 9
% 10.73/3.42 # Proof object conjectures : 5
% 10.73/3.42 # Proof object clause conjectures : 3
% 10.73/3.42 # Proof object formula conjectures : 2
% 10.73/3.42 # Proof object initial clauses used : 9
% 10.73/3.42 # Proof object initial formulas used : 9
% 10.73/3.42 # Proof object generating inferences : 6
% 10.73/3.42 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 6
% 10.73/3.42 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 10.73/3.42 # Parsed axioms : 2496
% 10.73/3.42 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 10.73/3.42 # Initial clauses : 2496
% 10.73/3.42 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 10.73/3.42 # Initial clauses in saturation : 2496
% 10.73/3.42 # Processed clauses : 2665
% 10.73/3.42 # ...of these trivial : 185
% 10.73/3.42 # ...subsumed : 197
% 10.73/3.42 # ...remaining for further processing : 2282
% 10.73/3.42 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 10.73/3.42 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 10.73/3.42 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 10.73/3.42 # Backward-rewritten : 6
% 10.73/3.42 # Generated clauses : 5545
% 10.73/3.42 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 5038
% 10.73/3.42 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 14
% 10.73/3.42 # Paramodulations : 5545
% 10.73/3.42 # Factorizations : 0
% 10.73/3.42 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 10.73/3.42 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 10.73/3.42 # Propositional unsat check successes : 0
% 10.73/3.42 # Current number of processed clauses : 2276
% 10.73/3.42 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 817
% 10.73/3.42 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 10.73/3.42 # Negative unit clauses : 65
% 10.73/3.42 # Non-unit-clauses : 1394
% 10.73/3.42 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 4863
% 10.73/3.42 # ...number of literals in the above : 8845
% 10.73/3.42 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 10.73/3.42 # Current number of archived clauses : 6
% 10.73/3.42 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 331787
% 10.73/3.42 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 299722
% 10.73/3.42 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 204
% 10.73/3.42 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 20653
% 10.73/3.42 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 10.73/3.42 # BW rewrite match attempts : 350
% 10.73/3.42 # BW rewrite match successes : 6
% 10.73/3.42 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 10.73/3.42 # Condensation successes : 0
% 10.73/3.42 # Termbank termtop insertions : 81864
% 10.73/3.42
% 10.73/3.42 # -------------------------------------------------
% 10.73/3.42 # User time : 0.190 s
% 10.73/3.42 # System time : 0.009 s
% 10.73/3.42 # Total time : 0.199 s
% 10.73/3.42 # ...preprocessing : 0.046 s
% 10.73/3.42 # ...main loop : 0.153 s
% 10.73/3.42 # Maximum resident set size: 19712 pages
% 10.73/3.42
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------