TSTP Solution File: CSR050+1 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : CSR050+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 03:01:50 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.22s 1.40s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.22s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 9
% Number of leaves : 10
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 37 ( 19 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 58 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 38 ( 17 ~; 13 |; 2 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 6 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 5 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 15 ( 15 usr; 11 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 18 ( 0 sgn 12 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query50,conjecture,
( mtvisible(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_memberstripodcomindygalfordtriviahtm)),c_translation_32))
=> tptptypes_7_691(c_tptpcol_16_26939,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtofn(c_ship,c_objectfoundinlocation,c_cityofbostonma)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',query50) ).
fof(just78,axiom,
! [X16,X17] :
( ( mtvisible(X16)
& genlmt(X16,X17) )
=> mtvisible(X17) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',just78) ).
fof(just7,axiom,
genlmt(c_ldscgeneralcollectormt,c_ldscdemonstrationspindleheadmt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',just7) ).
fof(just6,axiom,
genlmt(c_miptdatabase19681997_termsmt,c_ldscgeneralcollectormt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',just6) ).
fof(just4,axiom,
genlmt(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_memberstripodcomindygalfordtriviahtm)),c_translation_32),c_machinelearningspindleheadmt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',just4) ).
fof(just5,axiom,
genlmt(c_machinelearningspindleheadmt,c_miptdatabase19681997_termsmt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',just5) ).
fof(just15,axiom,
( mtvisible(c_currentworlddatacollectormt_nonhomocentric)
=> tptptypes_9_693(f_subcollectionofwithrelationtofn(c_ship,c_objectfoundinlocation,c_cityofbostonma),c_tptpcol_16_26939) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',just15) ).
fof(just1,axiom,
genlmt(c_ldscdemonstrationspindleheadmt,c_currentworlddatacollectormt_nonhomocentric),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',just1) ).
fof(just12,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( tptptypes_8_692(X1,X2)
=> tptptypes_7_691(X2,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',just12) ).
fof(just14,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( tptptypes_9_693(X1,X2)
=> tptptypes_8_692(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',just14) ).
fof(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
~ ( mtvisible(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_memberstripodcomindygalfordtriviahtm)),c_translation_32))
=> tptptypes_7_691(c_tptpcol_16_26939,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtofn(c_ship,c_objectfoundinlocation,c_cityofbostonma)) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query50]) ).
fof(c_0_11,plain,
! [X18,X19] :
( ~ mtvisible(X18)
| ~ genlmt(X18,X19)
| mtvisible(X19) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[just78])]) ).
fof(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
( mtvisible(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_memberstripodcomindygalfordtriviahtm)),c_translation_32))
& ~ tptptypes_7_691(c_tptpcol_16_26939,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtofn(c_ship,c_objectfoundinlocation,c_cityofbostonma)) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( mtvisible(X1)
| ~ genlmt(X2,X1)
| ~ mtvisible(X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
genlmt(c_ldscgeneralcollectormt,c_ldscdemonstrationspindleheadmt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[just7]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
genlmt(c_miptdatabase19681997_termsmt,c_ldscgeneralcollectormt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[just6]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
genlmt(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_memberstripodcomindygalfordtriviahtm)),c_translation_32),c_machinelearningspindleheadmt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[just4]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_memberstripodcomindygalfordtriviahtm)),c_translation_32)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( mtvisible(c_ldscdemonstrationspindleheadmt)
| ~ mtvisible(c_ldscgeneralcollectormt) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( mtvisible(c_ldscgeneralcollectormt)
| ~ mtvisible(c_miptdatabase19681997_termsmt) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
genlmt(c_machinelearningspindleheadmt,c_miptdatabase19681997_termsmt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[just5]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
mtvisible(c_machinelearningspindleheadmt),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_16]),c_0_17])]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
( mtvisible(c_ldscdemonstrationspindleheadmt)
| ~ mtvisible(c_miptdatabase19681997_termsmt) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
mtvisible(c_miptdatabase19681997_termsmt),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_20]),c_0_21])]) ).
fof(c_0_24,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_currentworlddatacollectormt_nonhomocentric)
| tptptypes_9_693(f_subcollectionofwithrelationtofn(c_ship,c_objectfoundinlocation,c_cityofbostonma),c_tptpcol_16_26939) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[just15]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
genlmt(c_ldscdemonstrationspindleheadmt,c_currentworlddatacollectormt_nonhomocentric),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[just1]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
mtvisible(c_ldscdemonstrationspindleheadmt),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23])]) ).
fof(c_0_27,plain,
! [X3,X4] :
( ~ tptptypes_8_692(X3,X4)
| tptptypes_7_691(X4,X3) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[just12])]) ).
fof(c_0_28,plain,
! [X3,X4] :
( ~ tptptypes_9_693(X3,X4)
| tptptypes_8_692(X3,X4) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[just14])]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
( tptptypes_9_693(f_subcollectionofwithrelationtofn(c_ship,c_objectfoundinlocation,c_cityofbostonma),c_tptpcol_16_26939)
| ~ mtvisible(c_currentworlddatacollectormt_nonhomocentric) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_24]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
mtvisible(c_currentworlddatacollectormt_nonhomocentric),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_25]),c_0_26])]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
~ tptptypes_7_691(c_tptpcol_16_26939,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtofn(c_ship,c_objectfoundinlocation,c_cityofbostonma)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,plain,
( tptptypes_7_691(X1,X2)
| ~ tptptypes_8_692(X2,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_27]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,plain,
( tptptypes_8_692(X1,X2)
| ~ tptptypes_9_693(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_28]) ).
cnf(c_0_34,plain,
tptptypes_9_693(f_subcollectionofwithrelationtofn(c_ship,c_objectfoundinlocation,c_cityofbostonma),c_tptpcol_16_26939),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30])]) ).
cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
~ tptptypes_8_692(f_subcollectionofwithrelationtofn(c_ship,c_objectfoundinlocation,c_cityofbostonma),c_tptpcol_16_26939),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]) ).
cnf(c_0_36,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_34]),c_0_35]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12 % Problem : CSR050+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.06/0.12 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 18:24:40 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.22/1.40 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.22/1.40 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.22/1.40 # Preprocessing time : 0.015 s
% 0.22/1.40
% 0.22/1.40 # Failure: Out of unprocessed clauses!
% 0.22/1.40 # OLD status GaveUp
% 0.22/1.40 # Parsed axioms : 87
% 0.22/1.40 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 64
% 0.22/1.40 # Initial clauses : 24
% 0.22/1.40 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.22/1.40 # Initial clauses in saturation : 24
% 0.22/1.40 # Processed clauses : 32
% 0.22/1.40 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.22/1.40 # ...subsumed : 5
% 0.22/1.40 # ...remaining for further processing : 27
% 0.22/1.40 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.22/1.40 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.22/1.40 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.22/1.40 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.22/1.40 # Generated clauses : 18
% 0.22/1.40 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 8
% 0.22/1.40 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.22/1.40 # Paramodulations : 18
% 0.22/1.40 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.22/1.40 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.22/1.40 # Current number of processed clauses : 27
% 0.22/1.40 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 11
% 0.22/1.40 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.22/1.40 # Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.22/1.40 # Non-unit-clauses : 14
% 0.22/1.40 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.22/1.40 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.22/1.40 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.22/1.40 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.22/1.40 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 22
% 0.22/1.40 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 16
% 0.22/1.40 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 5
% 0.22/1.40 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.22/1.40 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.22/1.40 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.22/1.40 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.22/1.40 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.22/1.40 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.22/1.40 # Termbank termtop insertions : 1775
% 0.22/1.40
% 0.22/1.40 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/1.40 # User time : 0.012 s
% 0.22/1.40 # System time : 0.004 s
% 0.22/1.40 # Total time : 0.016 s
% 0.22/1.40 # Maximum resident set size: 2852 pages
% 0.22/1.40 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_f171197f65f27d1ba69648a20c844832c84a5dd7 for 23 seconds:
% 0.22/1.40 # Preprocessing time : 0.017 s
% 0.22/1.40
% 0.22/1.40 # Proof found!
% 0.22/1.40 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.22/1.40 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.22/1.40 # Proof object total steps : 37
% 0.22/1.40 # Proof object clause steps : 21
% 0.22/1.40 # Proof object formula steps : 16
% 0.22/1.40 # Proof object conjectures : 6
% 0.22/1.40 # Proof object clause conjectures : 3
% 0.22/1.40 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.22/1.40 # Proof object initial clauses used : 11
% 0.22/1.40 # Proof object initial formulas used : 10
% 0.22/1.40 # Proof object generating inferences : 8
% 0.22/1.40 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 11
% 0.22/1.40 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.22/1.40 # Parsed axioms : 87
% 0.22/1.40 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.22/1.40 # Initial clauses : 88
% 0.22/1.40 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.22/1.40 # Initial clauses in saturation : 88
% 0.22/1.40 # Processed clauses : 133
% 0.22/1.40 # ...of these trivial : 8
% 0.22/1.40 # ...subsumed : 10
% 0.22/1.40 # ...remaining for further processing : 115
% 0.22/1.40 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.22/1.40 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.22/1.40 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.22/1.40 # Backward-rewritten : 6
% 0.22/1.40 # Generated clauses : 88
% 0.22/1.40 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 69
% 0.22/1.40 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.22/1.40 # Paramodulations : 88
% 0.22/1.40 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.22/1.40 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.22/1.40 # Current number of processed clauses : 109
% 0.22/1.40 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 58
% 0.22/1.40 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.22/1.40 # Negative unit clauses : 3
% 0.22/1.40 # Non-unit-clauses : 48
% 0.22/1.40 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 22
% 0.22/1.40 # ...number of literals in the above : 34
% 0.22/1.40 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.22/1.40 # Current number of archived clauses : 6
% 0.22/1.40 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 523
% 0.22/1.40 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 449
% 0.22/1.40 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 10
% 0.22/1.40 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 169
% 0.22/1.40 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.22/1.40 # BW rewrite match attempts : 4
% 0.22/1.40 # BW rewrite match successes : 4
% 0.22/1.40 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.22/1.40 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.22/1.40 # Termbank termtop insertions : 4901
% 0.22/1.40
% 0.22/1.40 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/1.40 # User time : 0.018 s
% 0.22/1.40 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.22/1.40 # Total time : 0.020 s
% 0.22/1.40 # Maximum resident set size: 3324 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------