TSTP Solution File: CSR048+4 by ET---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ET---2.0
% Problem  : CSR048+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_ET %s %d

% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 03:01:48 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 13.40s 14.58s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 13.40s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   15 (   6 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   27 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   22 (  10   ~;   6   |;   2   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   4 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   10 (   1 sgn   5   !;   2   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query198,conjecture,
    ? [X3] :
      ( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt)
     => borderson(c_georegion_l4_x45_y9,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',query198) ).

fof(ax3_6736,axiom,
    ( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member1_mt)
   => borderson(c_georegion_l4_x45_y9,c_georegion_l4_x45_y10) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_6736) ).

fof(ax3_44208,axiom,
    ! [X22,X23] :
      ( ( mtvisible(X22)
        & genlmt(X22,X23) )
     => mtvisible(X23) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_44208) ).

fof(ax3_4063,axiom,
    genlmt(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt,c_tptpgeo_member1_mt),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_4063) ).

fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ? [X3] :
        ( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt)
       => borderson(c_georegion_l4_x45_y9,X3) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query198]) ).

fof(c_0_5,plain,
    ( ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member1_mt)
    | borderson(c_georegion_l4_x45_y9,c_georegion_l4_x45_y10) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax3_6736]) ).

fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X4] :
      ( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt)
      & ~ borderson(c_georegion_l4_x45_y9,X4) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X24,X25] :
      ( ~ mtvisible(X24)
      | ~ genlmt(X24,X25)
      | mtvisible(X25) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax3_44208])]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    ( borderson(c_georegion_l4_x45_y9,c_georegion_l4_x45_y10)
    | ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member1_mt) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ~ borderson(c_georegion_l4_x45_y9,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( mtvisible(X1)
    | ~ genlmt(X2,X1)
    | ~ mtvisible(X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    genlmt(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt,c_tptpgeo_member1_mt),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax3_4063]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member1_mt),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_12])]),c_0_13]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.14  % Problem  : CSR048+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.12/0.15  % Command  : run_ET %s %d
% 0.16/0.37  % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.37  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.37  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.37  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.16/0.37  % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 06:08:08 EDT 2022
% 0.16/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 13.40/14.58  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 13.40/14.58  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 13.40/14.58  # Preprocessing time       : 0.657 s
% 13.40/14.58  
% 13.40/14.58  # Proof found!
% 13.40/14.58  # SZS status Theorem
% 13.40/14.58  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 13.40/14.58  # Proof object total steps             : 15
% 13.40/14.58  # Proof object clause steps            : 7
% 13.40/14.58  # Proof object formula steps           : 8
% 13.40/14.58  # Proof object conjectures             : 5
% 13.40/14.58  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 2
% 13.40/14.58  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
% 13.40/14.58  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 5
% 13.40/14.58  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 4
% 13.40/14.58  # Proof object generating inferences   : 1
% 13.40/14.58  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 4
% 13.40/14.58  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 13.40/14.58  # Parsed axioms                        : 44217
% 13.40/14.58  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 44174
% 13.40/14.58  # Initial clauses                      : 44
% 13.40/14.58  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 13.40/14.58  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 44
% 13.40/14.58  # Processed clauses                    : 32
% 13.40/14.58  # ...of these trivial                  : 5
% 13.40/14.58  # ...subsumed                          : 2
% 13.40/14.58  # ...remaining for further processing  : 25
% 13.40/14.58  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 13.40/14.58  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 13.40/14.58  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 13.40/14.58  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 13.40/14.58  # Generated clauses                    : 14
% 13.40/14.58  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 1
% 13.40/14.58  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 13.40/14.58  # Paramodulations                      : 14
% 13.40/14.58  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 13.40/14.58  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 13.40/14.58  # Current number of processed clauses  : 25
% 13.40/14.58  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 16
% 13.40/14.58  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 13.40/14.58  #    Negative unit clauses             : 3
% 13.40/14.58  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 6
% 13.40/14.58  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 13
% 13.40/14.58  # ...number of literals in the above   : 26
% 13.40/14.58  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 13.40/14.58  # Current number of archived clauses   : 0
% 13.40/14.58  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 12
% 13.40/14.58  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 10
% 13.40/14.58  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 1
% 13.40/14.58  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 4
% 13.40/14.58  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 13.40/14.58  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 13.40/14.58  # BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 13.40/14.58  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 13.40/14.58  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 13.40/14.58  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 293018
% 13.40/14.58  
% 13.40/14.58  # -------------------------------------------------
% 13.40/14.58  # User time                : 0.614 s
% 13.40/14.58  # System time              : 0.043 s
% 13.40/14.58  # Total time               : 0.657 s
% 13.40/14.58  # Maximum resident set size: 86392 pages
% 13.40/14.87  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 13.40/14.87  eprover: No such file or directory
% 13.40/14.88  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 13.40/14.88  eprover: No such file or directory
% 13.40/14.89  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 13.40/14.89  eprover: No such file or directory
% 13.40/14.89  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 13.40/14.89  eprover: No such file or directory
% 13.40/14.90  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 13.40/14.90  eprover: No such file or directory
% 13.40/14.91  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 13.40/14.91  eprover: No such file or directory
% 13.40/14.91  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 13.40/14.91  eprover: No such file or directory
% 13.40/14.92  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 13.40/14.92  eprover: No such file or directory
% 13.40/14.93  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 13.40/14.93  eprover: No such file or directory
% 13.40/14.93  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 13.40/14.93  eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------