TSTP Solution File: CSR048+1 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : CSR048+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 03:01:48 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.23s 1.42s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.23s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 15 ( 6 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 27 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 22 ( 10 ~; 6 |; 2 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 4 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 6 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 4 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 10 ( 1 sgn 5 !; 2 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query48,conjecture,
? [X9] :
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt)
=> borderson(c_georegion_l4_x45_y9,X9) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',query48) ).
fof(just2,axiom,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member1_mt)
=> borderson(c_georegion_l4_x45_y9,c_georegion_l4_x45_y10) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',just2) ).
fof(just31,axiom,
! [X15,X16] :
( ( mtvisible(X15)
& genlmt(X15,X16) )
=> mtvisible(X16) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',just31) ).
fof(just1,axiom,
genlmt(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt,c_tptpgeo_member1_mt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',just1) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X9] :
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt)
=> borderson(c_georegion_l4_x45_y9,X9) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query48]) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member1_mt)
| borderson(c_georegion_l4_x45_y9,c_georegion_l4_x45_y10) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[just2]) ).
fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
! [X10] :
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt)
& ~ borderson(c_georegion_l4_x45_y9,X10) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_7,plain,
! [X17,X18] :
( ~ mtvisible(X17)
| ~ genlmt(X17,X18)
| mtvisible(X18) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[just31])]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( borderson(c_georegion_l4_x45_y9,c_georegion_l4_x45_y10)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member1_mt) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
~ borderson(c_georegion_l4_x45_y9,X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( mtvisible(X1)
| ~ genlmt(X2,X1)
| ~ mtvisible(X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
genlmt(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt,c_tptpgeo_member1_mt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[just1]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member1_mt),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_12])]),c_0_13]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.12 % Problem : CSR048+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.13/0.13 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Fri Jun 10 22:41:54 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.23/1.42 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.23/1.42 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.23/1.42 # Preprocessing time : 0.014 s
% 0.23/1.42
% 0.23/1.42 # Failure: Out of unprocessed clauses!
% 0.23/1.42 # OLD status GaveUp
% 0.23/1.42 # Parsed axioms : 40
% 0.23/1.42 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 34
% 0.23/1.42 # Initial clauses : 7
% 0.23/1.42 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Initial clauses in saturation : 7
% 0.23/1.42 # Processed clauses : 9
% 0.23/1.42 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # ...remaining for further processing : 9
% 0.23/1.42 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Generated clauses : 2
% 0.23/1.42 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 2
% 0.23/1.42 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Paramodulations : 2
% 0.23/1.42 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Current number of processed clauses : 9
% 0.23/1.42 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 3
% 0.23/1.42 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.23/1.42 # Non-unit-clauses : 4
% 0.23/1.42 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.23/1.42 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 0.23/1.42 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Termbank termtop insertions : 604
% 0.23/1.42
% 0.23/1.42 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/1.42 # User time : 0.014 s
% 0.23/1.42 # System time : 0.001 s
% 0.23/1.42 # Total time : 0.015 s
% 0.23/1.42 # Maximum resident set size: 2708 pages
% 0.23/1.42 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_f171197f65f27d1ba69648a20c844832c84a5dd7 for 23 seconds:
% 0.23/1.42 # Preprocessing time : 0.016 s
% 0.23/1.42
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof found!
% 0.23/1.42 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.23/1.42 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof object total steps : 15
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof object clause steps : 7
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof object formula steps : 8
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof object conjectures : 5
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof object clause conjectures : 2
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof object initial clauses used : 5
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof object initial formulas used : 4
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof object generating inferences : 1
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 4
% 0.23/1.42 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.23/1.42 # Parsed axioms : 40
% 0.23/1.42 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Initial clauses : 41
% 0.23/1.42 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Initial clauses in saturation : 41
% 0.23/1.42 # Processed clauses : 13
% 0.23/1.42 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # ...subsumed : 1
% 0.23/1.42 # ...remaining for further processing : 12
% 0.23/1.42 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Generated clauses : 1
% 0.23/1.42 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Paramodulations : 1
% 0.23/1.42 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Current number of processed clauses : 12
% 0.23/1.42 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 4
% 0.23/1.42 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Negative unit clauses : 3
% 0.23/1.42 # Non-unit-clauses : 5
% 0.23/1.42 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 28
% 0.23/1.42 # ...number of literals in the above : 64
% 0.23/1.42 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1
% 0.23/1.42 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 0.23/1.42 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 1
% 0.23/1.42 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3
% 0.23/1.42 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Termbank termtop insertions : 2074
% 0.23/1.42
% 0.23/1.42 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/1.42 # User time : 0.015 s
% 0.23/1.42 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.23/1.42 # Total time : 0.017 s
% 0.23/1.42 # Maximum resident set size: 2920 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------