TSTP Solution File: CSR047+2 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : CSR047+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 03:01:47 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.28s 1.46s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.28s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 13 ( 4 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 22 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 16 ( 7 ~; 4 |; 1 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 4 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 5 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 3 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 6 ( 0 sgn 4 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query97,conjecture,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member4_mt)
=> borderson(c_georegion_l4_x37_y50,c_georegion_l4_x36_y50) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',query97) ).
fof(ax1_383,axiom,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member4_mt)
=> borderson(c_georegion_l4_x36_y50,c_georegion_l4_x37_y50) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_383) ).
fof(ax1_900,axiom,
! [X13,X14] :
( borderson(X13,X14)
=> borderson(X14,X13) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_900) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ ( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member4_mt)
=> borderson(c_georegion_l4_x37_y50,c_georegion_l4_x36_y50) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query97]) ).
fof(c_0_4,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member4_mt)
| borderson(c_georegion_l4_x36_y50,c_georegion_l4_x37_y50) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax1_383]) ).
fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member4_mt)
& ~ borderson(c_georegion_l4_x37_y50,c_georegion_l4_x36_y50) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X15,X16] :
( ~ borderson(X15,X16)
| borderson(X16,X15) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax1_900])]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( borderson(c_georegion_l4_x36_y50,c_georegion_l4_x37_y50)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member4_mt) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member4_mt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( borderson(X1,X2)
| ~ borderson(X2,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
borderson(c_georegion_l4_x36_y50,c_georegion_l4_x37_y50),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8])]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
~ borderson(c_georegion_l4_x37_y50,c_georegion_l4_x36_y50),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_11]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12 % Problem : CSR047+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.11/0.13 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.14/0.34 % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.34 % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 17:08:56 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.28/1.46 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.28/1.46 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.28/1.46 # Preprocessing time : 0.032 s
% 0.28/1.46
% 0.28/1.46 # Proof found!
% 0.28/1.46 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.28/1.46 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.28/1.46 # Proof object total steps : 13
% 0.28/1.46 # Proof object clause steps : 6
% 0.28/1.46 # Proof object formula steps : 7
% 0.28/1.46 # Proof object conjectures : 5
% 0.28/1.46 # Proof object clause conjectures : 2
% 0.28/1.46 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.28/1.46 # Proof object initial clauses used : 4
% 0.28/1.46 # Proof object initial formulas used : 3
% 0.28/1.46 # Proof object generating inferences : 1
% 0.28/1.46 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 3
% 0.28/1.46 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.28/1.46 # Parsed axioms : 1132
% 0.28/1.46 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 1115
% 0.28/1.46 # Initial clauses : 18
% 0.28/1.46 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.28/1.46 # Initial clauses in saturation : 18
% 0.28/1.46 # Processed clauses : 10
% 0.28/1.46 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.28/1.46 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.28/1.46 # ...remaining for further processing : 10
% 0.28/1.46 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.28/1.46 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.28/1.46 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.28/1.46 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.28/1.46 # Generated clauses : 4
% 0.28/1.46 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 2
% 0.28/1.46 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.28/1.46 # Paramodulations : 4
% 0.28/1.46 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.28/1.46 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.28/1.46 # Current number of processed clauses : 10
% 0.28/1.46 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 2
% 0.28/1.46 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.28/1.46 # Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.28/1.46 # Non-unit-clauses : 6
% 0.28/1.46 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 10
% 0.28/1.46 # ...number of literals in the above : 21
% 0.28/1.46 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.28/1.46 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.28/1.46 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 3
% 0.28/1.46 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 0.28/1.46 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.28/1.46 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 0.28/1.46 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.28/1.46 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.28/1.46 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.28/1.46 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.28/1.46 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.28/1.46 # Termbank termtop insertions : 8005
% 0.28/1.46
% 0.28/1.46 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.28/1.46 # User time : 0.025 s
% 0.28/1.46 # System time : 0.008 s
% 0.28/1.46 # Total time : 0.033 s
% 0.28/1.46 # Maximum resident set size: 5136 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------