TSTP Solution File: CSR045+1 by Princess---230619
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Princess---230619
% Problem : CSR045+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp
% Command : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s
% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 30 21:36:45 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 14.21s 2.86s
% Output : Proof 17.92s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13 % Problem : CSR045+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.00/0.13 % Command : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Mon Aug 28 10:16:19 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.22/0.64 ________ _____
% 0.22/0.64 ___ __ \_________(_)________________________________
% 0.22/0.64 __ /_/ /_ ___/_ /__ __ \ ___/ _ \_ ___/_ ___/
% 0.22/0.64 _ ____/_ / _ / _ / / / /__ / __/(__ )_(__ )
% 0.22/0.64 /_/ /_/ /_/ /_/ /_/\___/ \___//____/ /____/
% 0.22/0.64
% 0.22/0.64 A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic modulo Linear Integer Arithmetic
% 0.22/0.64 (2023-06-19)
% 0.22/0.64
% 0.22/0.64 (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2023
% 0.22/0.64 Contributors: Peter Backeman, Peter Baumgartner, Angelo Brillout, Zafer Esen,
% 0.22/0.64 Amanda Stjerna.
% 0.22/0.64 Free software under BSD-3-Clause.
% 0.22/0.64
% 0.22/0.64 For more information, visit http://www.philipp.ruemmer.org/princess.shtml
% 0.22/0.64
% 0.22/0.64 Loading /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 0.22/0.66 Running up to 7 provers in parallel.
% 0.22/0.68 Prover 2: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimalAndEmpty -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1065072994
% 0.22/0.68 Prover 0: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1042961893
% 0.22/0.68 Prover 1: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1571432423
% 0.22/0.68 Prover 3: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1922548996
% 0.22/0.68 Prover 4: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1868514696
% 0.22/0.68 Prover 5: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1259561288
% 0.22/0.68 Prover 6: Options: -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximalOutermost -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1399714365
% 3.87/1.35 Prover 1: Preprocessing ...
% 3.87/1.35 Prover 4: Preprocessing ...
% 3.87/1.43 Prover 6: Preprocessing ...
% 3.87/1.43 Prover 0: Preprocessing ...
% 3.87/1.43 Prover 5: Preprocessing ...
% 3.87/1.43 Prover 2: Preprocessing ...
% 3.87/1.44 Prover 3: Preprocessing ...
% 6.80/1.83 Prover 5: Constructing countermodel ...
% 6.80/1.83 Prover 2: Constructing countermodel ...
% 8.02/2.05 Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ...
% 8.02/2.06 Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ...
% 8.02/2.07 Prover 6: Constructing countermodel ...
% 9.93/2.26 Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ...
% 10.59/2.33 Prover 0: Proving ...
% 10.59/2.33 Prover 3: gave up
% 10.59/2.34 Prover 7: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-236303470
% 11.19/2.40 Prover 7: Preprocessing ...
% 11.19/2.46 Prover 1: gave up
% 11.19/2.46 Prover 8: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-200781089
% 12.21/2.52 Prover 7: Constructing countermodel ...
% 12.25/2.56 Prover 8: Preprocessing ...
% 12.25/2.59 Prover 6: gave up
% 12.25/2.59 Prover 9: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1423531889
% 13.49/2.70 Prover 9: Preprocessing ...
% 13.49/2.73 Prover 8: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 13.49/2.74 Prover 8: Constructing countermodel ...
% 14.21/2.86 Prover 2: proved (2188ms)
% 14.21/2.86
% 14.21/2.86 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 14.21/2.86
% 14.21/2.86 Prover 5: stopped
% 14.21/2.87 Prover 0: stopped
% 14.21/2.88 Prover 10: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=919308125
% 14.21/2.88 Prover 11: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1509710984
% 14.21/2.88 Prover 13: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1138197443
% 14.87/2.93 Prover 9: Constructing countermodel ...
% 15.31/2.94 Prover 9: stopped
% 15.31/2.94 Prover 16: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=completeFrugal -randomSeed=-2043353683
% 15.31/2.95 Prover 11: Preprocessing ...
% 15.31/2.96 Prover 10: Preprocessing ...
% 15.31/2.97 Prover 13: Preprocessing ...
% 15.31/2.98 Prover 8: gave up
% 15.31/3.00 Prover 19: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=-1780594085
% 15.78/3.00 Prover 16: Preprocessing ...
% 15.78/3.02 Prover 13: Constructing countermodel ...
% 15.78/3.03 Prover 10: Constructing countermodel ...
% 15.78/3.05 Prover 19: Preprocessing ...
% 16.24/3.07 Prover 16: Constructing countermodel ...
% 17.30/3.22 Prover 13: Found proof (size 20)
% 17.30/3.22 Prover 13: proved (337ms)
% 17.30/3.22 Prover 10: stopped
% 17.30/3.22 Prover 16: stopped
% 17.30/3.22 Prover 7: stopped
% 17.30/3.22 Prover 4: stopped
% 17.30/3.23 Prover 19: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 17.61/3.24 Prover 19: Constructing countermodel ...
% 17.61/3.24 Prover 11: Constructing countermodel ...
% 17.61/3.25 Prover 19: stopped
% 17.61/3.26 Prover 11: stopped
% 17.61/3.26
% 17.61/3.26 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 17.61/3.26
% 17.61/3.26 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 17.61/3.27 Assumptions after simplification:
% 17.61/3.27 ---------------------------------
% 17.61/3.27
% 17.61/3.27 (just1)
% 17.61/3.27 $i(c_wamt_evalinitial_p14) & applicationcontext(c_wamt_evalinitial_p14)
% 17.61/3.27
% 17.61/3.27 (just13)
% 17.61/3.27 $i(c_applicationcontext) & $i(c_microtheory) & genls(c_applicationcontext,
% 17.61/3.27 c_microtheory)
% 17.61/3.27
% 17.61/3.27 (just16)
% 17.61/3.27 $i(c_collection) & $i(c_individual) & disjointwith(c_collection, c_individual)
% 17.61/3.27
% 17.61/3.28 (just17)
% 17.61/3.28 ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : ( ~ $i(v2) | ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) |
% 17.61/3.28 ~ isa(v0, v2) | ~ isa(v0, v1) | ~ disjointwith(v1, v2))
% 17.61/3.28
% 17.61/3.28 (just2)
% 17.61/3.28 $i(c_aspatialinformationstore) & $i(c_microtheory) & genls(c_microtheory,
% 17.61/3.28 c_aspatialinformationstore)
% 17.61/3.28
% 17.61/3.28 (just20)
% 17.61/3.28 ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ~ genls(v0, v1) |
% 17.61/3.28 collection(v0))
% 17.61/3.28
% 17.61/3.28 (just21)
% 17.61/3.28 ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : ( ~ $i(v2) | ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) |
% 17.61/3.28 ~ isa(v0, v2) | ~ isa(v0, v1) | ~ disjointwith(v1, v2))
% 17.61/3.28
% 17.61/3.28 (just40)
% 17.61/3.28 $i(c_collection) & ! [v0: $i] : ( ~ $i(v0) | ~ collection(v0) | isa(v0,
% 17.61/3.28 c_collection))
% 17.61/3.28
% 17.61/3.28 (just44)
% 17.61/3.28 ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : ( ~ $i(v2) | ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) |
% 17.61/3.28 ~ disjointwith(v0, v1) | ~ genls(v2, v1) | disjointwith(v0, v2))
% 17.61/3.28
% 17.61/3.28 (just5)
% 17.61/3.28 $i(c_partiallyintangibleindividual) & $i(c_intangibleindividual) &
% 17.61/3.28 genls(c_intangibleindividual, c_partiallyintangibleindividual)
% 17.61/3.28
% 17.61/3.28 (just7)
% 17.61/3.28 $i(c_intangibleindividual) & $i(c_aspatialinformationstore) &
% 17.61/3.28 genls(c_aspatialinformationstore, c_intangibleindividual)
% 17.61/3.28
% 17.61/3.28 (just70)
% 17.61/3.28 ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ~ genls(v0, v1) |
% 17.61/3.28 collection(v0))
% 17.61/3.28
% 17.61/3.28 (just71)
% 17.61/3.29 ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ~ genls(v0, v1) |
% 17.61/3.29 collection(v0))
% 17.61/3.29
% 17.61/3.29 (just75)
% 17.61/3.29 ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : ( ~ $i(v2) | ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) |
% 17.61/3.29 ~ genls(v2, v0) | ~ genls(v0, v1) | genls(v2, v1))
% 17.61/3.29
% 17.61/3.29 (just78)
% 17.61/3.29 $i(c_applicationcontext) & ! [v0: $i] : ( ~ $i(v0) | ~
% 17.61/3.29 applicationcontext(v0) | isa(v0, c_applicationcontext))
% 17.61/3.29
% 17.61/3.29 (just83)
% 17.61/3.29 ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : ( ~ $i(v2) | ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) |
% 17.61/3.29 ~ isa(v0, v1) | ~ genls(v1, v2) | isa(v0, v2))
% 17.61/3.29
% 17.61/3.29 (just9)
% 17.61/3.29 $i(c_individual) & $i(c_partiallyintangibleindividual) &
% 17.61/3.29 genls(c_partiallyintangibleindividual, c_individual)
% 17.61/3.29
% 17.61/3.29 (query45)
% 17.61/3.29 $i(c_tptpcol_15_80088) & $i(c_wamt_evalinitial_p14) &
% 17.61/3.29 genls(c_wamt_evalinitial_p14, c_tptpcol_15_80088)
% 17.61/3.29
% 17.61/3.29 Further assumptions not needed in the proof:
% 17.61/3.29 --------------------------------------------
% 17.61/3.29 just10, just11, just12, just14, just15, just18, just19, just22, just23, just24,
% 17.61/3.29 just25, just26, just27, just28, just29, just3, just30, just31, just32, just33,
% 17.61/3.29 just34, just35, just36, just37, just38, just39, just4, just41, just42, just43,
% 17.61/3.29 just45, just46, just47, just48, just49, just50, just51, just52, just53, just54,
% 17.61/3.29 just55, just56, just57, just58, just59, just6, just60, just61, just62, just63,
% 17.61/3.29 just64, just65, just66, just67, just68, just69, just72, just73, just74, just76,
% 17.61/3.29 just77, just79, just8, just80, just81, just82, just84
% 17.61/3.29
% 17.61/3.29 Those formulas are unsatisfiable:
% 17.61/3.29 ---------------------------------
% 17.61/3.29
% 17.61/3.29 Begin of proof
% 17.61/3.29 |
% 17.61/3.29 | ALPHA: (query45) implies:
% 17.61/3.29 | (1) genls(c_wamt_evalinitial_p14, c_tptpcol_15_80088)
% 17.61/3.29 | (2) $i(c_tptpcol_15_80088)
% 17.61/3.29 |
% 17.61/3.29 | ALPHA: (just78) implies:
% 17.61/3.29 | (3) ! [v0: $i] : ( ~ $i(v0) | ~ applicationcontext(v0) | isa(v0,
% 17.61/3.29 | c_applicationcontext))
% 17.61/3.29 |
% 17.61/3.29 | ALPHA: (just40) implies:
% 17.61/3.29 | (4) ! [v0: $i] : ( ~ $i(v0) | ~ collection(v0) | isa(v0, c_collection))
% 17.61/3.29 |
% 17.61/3.29 | ALPHA: (just16) implies:
% 17.61/3.29 | (5) disjointwith(c_collection, c_individual)
% 17.61/3.29 | (6) $i(c_collection)
% 17.61/3.29 |
% 17.61/3.29 | ALPHA: (just13) implies:
% 17.61/3.29 | (7) genls(c_applicationcontext, c_microtheory)
% 17.61/3.29 | (8) $i(c_applicationcontext)
% 17.61/3.29 |
% 17.61/3.29 | ALPHA: (just9) implies:
% 17.61/3.29 | (9) genls(c_partiallyintangibleindividual, c_individual)
% 17.61/3.29 | (10) $i(c_individual)
% 17.61/3.29 |
% 17.61/3.29 | ALPHA: (just7) implies:
% 17.61/3.29 | (11) genls(c_aspatialinformationstore, c_intangibleindividual)
% 17.61/3.29 |
% 17.61/3.29 | ALPHA: (just5) implies:
% 17.61/3.29 | (12) genls(c_intangibleindividual, c_partiallyintangibleindividual)
% 17.61/3.30 | (13) $i(c_intangibleindividual)
% 17.61/3.30 | (14) $i(c_partiallyintangibleindividual)
% 17.61/3.30 |
% 17.61/3.30 | ALPHA: (just2) implies:
% 17.61/3.30 | (15) genls(c_microtheory, c_aspatialinformationstore)
% 17.61/3.30 | (16) $i(c_microtheory)
% 17.61/3.30 | (17) $i(c_aspatialinformationstore)
% 17.61/3.30 |
% 17.61/3.30 | ALPHA: (just1) implies:
% 17.61/3.30 | (18) applicationcontext(c_wamt_evalinitial_p14)
% 17.61/3.30 | (19) $i(c_wamt_evalinitial_p14)
% 17.61/3.30 |
% 17.61/3.30 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (3) with c_wamt_evalinitial_p14, simplifying with
% 17.61/3.30 | (18), (19) gives:
% 17.61/3.30 | (20) isa(c_wamt_evalinitial_p14, c_applicationcontext)
% 17.61/3.30 |
% 17.61/3.30 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (just71) with c_wamt_evalinitial_p14,
% 17.61/3.30 | c_tptpcol_15_80088, simplifying with (1), (2), (19) gives:
% 17.61/3.30 | (21) collection(c_wamt_evalinitial_p14)
% 17.61/3.30 |
% 17.92/3.30 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (just75) with c_intangibleindividual,
% 17.92/3.30 | c_partiallyintangibleindividual, c_aspatialinformationstore,
% 17.92/3.30 | simplifying with (11), (12), (13), (14), (17) gives:
% 17.92/3.30 | (22) genls(c_aspatialinformationstore, c_partiallyintangibleindividual)
% 17.92/3.30 |
% 17.92/3.30 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (just75) with c_microtheory,
% 17.92/3.30 | c_aspatialinformationstore, c_applicationcontext, simplifying
% 17.92/3.30 | with (7), (8), (15), (16), (17) gives:
% 17.92/3.30 | (23) genls(c_applicationcontext, c_aspatialinformationstore)
% 17.92/3.30 |
% 17.92/3.30 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (just44) with c_collection, c_individual,
% 17.92/3.30 | c_partiallyintangibleindividual, simplifying with (5), (6), (9),
% 17.92/3.30 | (10), (14) gives:
% 17.92/3.30 | (24) disjointwith(c_collection, c_partiallyintangibleindividual)
% 17.92/3.30 |
% 17.92/3.30 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (4) with c_wamt_evalinitial_p14, simplifying with
% 17.92/3.30 | (19), (21) gives:
% 17.92/3.30 | (25) isa(c_wamt_evalinitial_p14, c_collection)
% 17.92/3.30 |
% 17.92/3.30 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (just44) with c_collection,
% 17.92/3.30 | c_partiallyintangibleindividual, c_aspatialinformationstore,
% 17.92/3.30 | simplifying with (6), (14), (17), (22), (24) gives:
% 17.92/3.30 | (26) disjointwith(c_collection, c_aspatialinformationstore)
% 17.92/3.30 |
% 17.92/3.30 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (just83) with c_wamt_evalinitial_p14,
% 17.92/3.30 | c_applicationcontext, c_aspatialinformationstore, simplifying
% 17.92/3.30 | with (8), (17), (19), (20), (23) gives:
% 17.92/3.30 | (27) isa(c_wamt_evalinitial_p14, c_aspatialinformationstore)
% 17.92/3.30 |
% 17.92/3.30 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (just21) with c_wamt_evalinitial_p14, c_collection,
% 17.92/3.30 | c_aspatialinformationstore, simplifying with (6), (17), (19),
% 17.92/3.30 | (25), (26), (27) gives:
% 17.92/3.30 | (28) $false
% 17.92/3.30 |
% 17.92/3.30 | CLOSE: (28) is inconsistent.
% 17.92/3.30 |
% 17.92/3.30 End of proof
% 17.92/3.30 % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 17.92/3.30
% 17.92/3.30 2665ms
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------