TSTP Solution File: CSR045+1 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : CSR045+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 03:01:45 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.24s 1.41s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.24s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 9
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 34 ( 9 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 59 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 53 ( 28 ~; 18 |; 1 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 6 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 5 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 9 ( 8 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 2 ( 2 usr; 2 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 28 ( 1 sgn 16 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(just15,axiom,
! [X1] :
~ ( collection(X1)
& individual(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',just15) ).
fof(just10,axiom,
! [X1] :
( partiallyintangibleindividual(X1)
=> individual(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',just10) ).
fof(just6,axiom,
! [X1] :
( intangibleindividual(X1)
=> partiallyintangibleindividual(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',just6) ).
fof(just8,axiom,
! [X1] :
( aspatialinformationstore(X1)
=> intangibleindividual(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',just8) ).
fof(query45,conjecture,
~ genls(c_wamt_evalinitial_p14,c_tptpcol_15_80088),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',query45) ).
fof(just3,axiom,
! [X1] :
( microtheory(X1)
=> aspatialinformationstore(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',just3) ).
fof(just14,axiom,
! [X1] :
( applicationcontext(X1)
=> microtheory(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',just14) ).
fof(just20,axiom,
! [X7,X8] :
( genls(X7,X8)
=> collection(X7) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',just20) ).
fof(just1,axiom,
applicationcontext(c_wamt_evalinitial_p14),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',just1) ).
fof(c_0_9,plain,
! [X2] :
( ~ collection(X2)
| ~ individual(X2) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[just15])]) ).
fof(c_0_10,plain,
! [X2] :
( ~ partiallyintangibleindividual(X2)
| individual(X2) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[just10])]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( ~ individual(X1)
| ~ collection(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( individual(X1)
| ~ partiallyintangibleindividual(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
fof(c_0_13,plain,
! [X2] :
( ~ intangibleindividual(X2)
| partiallyintangibleindividual(X2) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[just6])]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( ~ collection(X1)
| ~ partiallyintangibleindividual(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( partiallyintangibleindividual(X1)
| ~ intangibleindividual(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
fof(c_0_16,plain,
! [X2] :
( ~ aspatialinformationstore(X2)
| intangibleindividual(X2) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[just8])]) ).
fof(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
~ ~ genls(c_wamt_evalinitial_p14,c_tptpcol_15_80088),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query45]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( ~ collection(X1)
| ~ intangibleindividual(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( intangibleindividual(X1)
| ~ aspatialinformationstore(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).
fof(c_0_20,plain,
! [X2] :
( ~ microtheory(X2)
| aspatialinformationstore(X2) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[just3])]) ).
fof(c_0_21,plain,
! [X2] :
( ~ applicationcontext(X2)
| microtheory(X2) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[just14])]) ).
fof(c_0_22,plain,
! [X9,X10] :
( ~ genls(X9,X10)
| collection(X9) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[just20])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
genls(c_wamt_evalinitial_p14,c_tptpcol_15_80088),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
( ~ collection(X1)
| ~ aspatialinformationstore(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
( aspatialinformationstore(X1)
| ~ microtheory(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
( microtheory(X1)
| ~ applicationcontext(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
applicationcontext(c_wamt_evalinitial_p14),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[just1]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
( collection(X1)
| ~ genls(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
genls(c_wamt_evalinitial_p14,c_tptpcol_15_80088),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_23]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
( ~ collection(X1)
| ~ microtheory(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,plain,
microtheory(c_wamt_evalinitial_p14),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
collection(c_wamt_evalinitial_p14),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,plain,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]),c_0_32])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : CSR045+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.12/0.13 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Fri Jun 10 18:46:49 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.24/1.41 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.24/1.41 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.24/1.41 # Preprocessing time : 0.016 s
% 0.24/1.41
% 0.24/1.41 # Failure: Out of unprocessed clauses!
% 0.24/1.41 # OLD status GaveUp
% 0.24/1.41 # Parsed axioms : 85
% 0.24/1.41 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 56
% 0.24/1.41 # Initial clauses : 29
% 0.24/1.41 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.24/1.41 # Initial clauses in saturation : 29
% 0.24/1.41 # Processed clauses : 68
% 0.24/1.41 # ...of these trivial : 4
% 0.24/1.41 # ...subsumed : 18
% 0.24/1.41 # ...remaining for further processing : 46
% 0.24/1.41 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.24/1.41 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.24/1.41 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.24/1.41 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.24/1.41 # Generated clauses : 78
% 0.24/1.41 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 39
% 0.24/1.41 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 3
% 0.24/1.41 # Paramodulations : 78
% 0.24/1.41 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.24/1.41 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.24/1.41 # Current number of processed clauses : 46
% 0.24/1.41 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 19
% 0.24/1.41 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.24/1.41 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.24/1.41 # Non-unit-clauses : 27
% 0.24/1.41 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.24/1.41 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.24/1.41 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.24/1.41 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.24/1.41 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 51
% 0.24/1.41 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 51
% 0.24/1.41 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 21
% 0.24/1.41 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.24/1.41 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.24/1.41 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.24/1.41 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.24/1.41 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.24/1.41 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.24/1.41 # Termbank termtop insertions : 2448
% 0.24/1.41
% 0.24/1.41 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.24/1.41 # User time : 0.013 s
% 0.24/1.41 # System time : 0.004 s
% 0.24/1.41 # Total time : 0.018 s
% 0.24/1.41 # Maximum resident set size: 2816 pages
% 0.24/1.41 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_f171197f65f27d1ba69648a20c844832c84a5dd7 for 23 seconds:
% 0.24/1.41 # Preprocessing time : 0.017 s
% 0.24/1.41
% 0.24/1.41 # Proof found!
% 0.24/1.41 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.24/1.41 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.24/1.41 # Proof object total steps : 34
% 0.24/1.41 # Proof object clause steps : 16
% 0.24/1.41 # Proof object formula steps : 18
% 0.24/1.41 # Proof object conjectures : 5
% 0.24/1.41 # Proof object clause conjectures : 2
% 0.24/1.41 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.24/1.41 # Proof object initial clauses used : 9
% 0.24/1.41 # Proof object initial formulas used : 9
% 0.24/1.41 # Proof object generating inferences : 7
% 0.24/1.41 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 2
% 0.24/1.41 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.24/1.41 # Parsed axioms : 85
% 0.24/1.41 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.24/1.41 # Initial clauses : 85
% 0.24/1.41 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.24/1.41 # Initial clauses in saturation : 85
% 0.24/1.41 # Processed clauses : 127
% 0.24/1.41 # ...of these trivial : 7
% 0.24/1.41 # ...subsumed : 18
% 0.24/1.41 # ...remaining for further processing : 102
% 0.24/1.41 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.24/1.41 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.24/1.41 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.24/1.41 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.24/1.41 # Generated clauses : 177
% 0.24/1.41 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 140
% 0.24/1.41 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.24/1.41 # Paramodulations : 177
% 0.24/1.41 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.24/1.41 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.24/1.41 # Current number of processed clauses : 102
% 0.24/1.41 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 38
% 0.24/1.41 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.24/1.41 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.24/1.41 # Non-unit-clauses : 64
% 0.24/1.41 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 98
% 0.24/1.41 # ...number of literals in the above : 192
% 0.24/1.41 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.24/1.41 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.24/1.41 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 672
% 0.24/1.41 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 604
% 0.24/1.41 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 18
% 0.24/1.41 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 297
% 0.24/1.41 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.24/1.41 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.24/1.41 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.24/1.41 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.24/1.41 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.24/1.41 # Termbank termtop insertions : 5474
% 0.24/1.41
% 0.24/1.41 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.24/1.41 # User time : 0.017 s
% 0.24/1.41 # System time : 0.004 s
% 0.24/1.41 # Total time : 0.021 s
% 0.24/1.41 # Maximum resident set size: 3300 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------