TSTP Solution File: CSR044+4 by Enigma---0.5.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : CSR044+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 02:46:56 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 11.13s 4.02s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 11.13s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :   11
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   29 (  12 unt;   0 nHn;  29 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   52 (   0 equ;  29 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    8 (   7 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   7 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   21 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_2513,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ tptpcol_16_29490(X1)
    | ~ tptp_9_720(c_tptpexecutionbyfiringsquad_90,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-236l_ns6/input.p',i_0_2513) ).

cnf(i_0_1426,plain,
    ( tptpcol_16_29490(X1)
    | ~ isa(X1,c_tptpcol_16_29490) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-236l_ns6/input.p',i_0_1426) ).

cnf(i_0_284,plain,
    ( tptp_9_720(X1,f_relationallexistsfn(X1,c_tptp_9_720,c_executionbyfiringsquad,c_tptpcol_16_29490))
    | ~ executionbyfiringsquad(X1)
    | ~ mtvisible(c_cyclistsmt) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-236l_ns6/input.p',i_0_284) ).

cnf(i_0_2223,plain,
    executionbyfiringsquad(c_tptpexecutionbyfiringsquad_90),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-236l_ns6/input.p',i_0_2223) ).

cnf(i_0_2154,plain,
    ( mtvisible(X1)
    | ~ mtvisible(X2)
    | ~ genlmt(X2,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-236l_ns6/input.p',i_0_2154) ).

cnf(i_0_47,plain,
    genlmt(c_tptp_member3633_mt,c_tptp_spindleheadmt),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-236l_ns6/input.p',i_0_47) ).

cnf(i_0_2514,negated_conjecture,
    mtvisible(c_tptp_member3633_mt),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-236l_ns6/input.p',i_0_2514) ).

cnf(i_0_238,plain,
    ( isa(f_relationallexistsfn(X1,X2,X3,X4),X4)
    | ~ isa(X1,X3)
    | ~ relationallexists(X2,X3,X4) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-236l_ns6/input.p',i_0_238) ).

cnf(i_0_285,plain,
    ( relationallexists(c_tptp_9_720,c_executionbyfiringsquad,c_tptpcol_16_29490)
    | ~ mtvisible(c_cyclistsmt) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-236l_ns6/input.p',i_0_285) ).

cnf(i_0_484,plain,
    genlmt(c_tptp_spindleheadmt,c_cyclistsmt),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-236l_ns6/input.p',i_0_484) ).

cnf(i_0_2107,plain,
    ( isa(X1,c_executionbyfiringsquad)
    | ~ executionbyfiringsquad(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-236l_ns6/input.p',i_0_2107) ).

cnf(c_0_2526,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ tptpcol_16_29490(X1)
    | ~ tptp_9_720(c_tptpexecutionbyfiringsquad_90,X1) ),
    i_0_2513 ).

cnf(c_0_2527,plain,
    ( tptpcol_16_29490(X1)
    | ~ isa(X1,c_tptpcol_16_29490) ),
    i_0_1426 ).

cnf(c_0_2528,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ tptp_9_720(c_tptpexecutionbyfiringsquad_90,X1)
    | ~ isa(X1,c_tptpcol_16_29490) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2526,c_0_2527]) ).

cnf(c_0_2529,plain,
    ( tptp_9_720(X1,f_relationallexistsfn(X1,c_tptp_9_720,c_executionbyfiringsquad,c_tptpcol_16_29490))
    | ~ executionbyfiringsquad(X1)
    | ~ mtvisible(c_cyclistsmt) ),
    i_0_284 ).

cnf(c_0_2530,plain,
    executionbyfiringsquad(c_tptpexecutionbyfiringsquad_90),
    i_0_2223 ).

cnf(c_0_2531,plain,
    ( mtvisible(X1)
    | ~ mtvisible(X2)
    | ~ genlmt(X2,X1) ),
    i_0_2154 ).

cnf(c_0_2532,plain,
    genlmt(c_tptp_member3633_mt,c_tptp_spindleheadmt),
    i_0_47 ).

cnf(c_0_2533,negated_conjecture,
    mtvisible(c_tptp_member3633_mt),
    i_0_2514 ).

cnf(c_0_2534,plain,
    ( ~ isa(f_relationallexistsfn(c_tptpexecutionbyfiringsquad_90,c_tptp_9_720,c_executionbyfiringsquad,c_tptpcol_16_29490),c_tptpcol_16_29490)
    | ~ mtvisible(c_cyclistsmt) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2528,c_0_2529]),c_0_2530])]) ).

cnf(c_0_2535,plain,
    ( isa(f_relationallexistsfn(X1,X2,X3,X4),X4)
    | ~ isa(X1,X3)
    | ~ relationallexists(X2,X3,X4) ),
    i_0_238 ).

cnf(c_0_2536,plain,
    ( relationallexists(c_tptp_9_720,c_executionbyfiringsquad,c_tptpcol_16_29490)
    | ~ mtvisible(c_cyclistsmt) ),
    i_0_285 ).

cnf(c_0_2537,plain,
    genlmt(c_tptp_spindleheadmt,c_cyclistsmt),
    i_0_484 ).

cnf(c_0_2538,plain,
    mtvisible(c_tptp_spindleheadmt),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2531,c_0_2532]),c_0_2533])]) ).

cnf(c_0_2539,plain,
    ( ~ isa(c_tptpexecutionbyfiringsquad_90,c_executionbyfiringsquad)
    | ~ mtvisible(c_cyclistsmt) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2534,c_0_2535]),c_0_2536]) ).

cnf(c_0_2540,plain,
    mtvisible(c_cyclistsmt),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2531,c_0_2537]),c_0_2538])]) ).

cnf(c_0_2541,plain,
    ( isa(X1,c_executionbyfiringsquad)
    | ~ executionbyfiringsquad(X1) ),
    i_0_2107 ).

cnf(c_0_2542,plain,
    ~ isa(c_tptpexecutionbyfiringsquad_90,c_executionbyfiringsquad),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_2539,c_0_2540])]) ).

cnf(c_0_2543,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2541,c_0_2530]),c_0_2542]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : CSR044+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 02:48:40 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.45  # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.86/1.07  # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.86/1.07  # Filter: axfilter_auto   0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   0.p
% 0.86/1.07  # Filter: axfilter_auto   1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   1.p
% 0.86/1.07  # Filter: axfilter_auto   2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   2.p
% 11.13/4.02  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_S0Y:
% 11.13/4.02  # Version: 2.1pre011
% 11.13/4.02  # Preprocessing time       : 0.070 s
% 11.13/4.02  
% 11.13/4.02  # Proof found!
% 11.13/4.02  # SZS status Theorem
% 11.13/4.02  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 11.13/4.02  # Proof object total steps             : 29
% 11.13/4.02  # Proof object clause steps            : 18
% 11.13/4.02  # Proof object formula steps           : 11
% 11.13/4.02  # Proof object conjectures             : 5
% 11.13/4.02  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 3
% 11.13/4.02  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 2
% 11.13/4.02  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 11
% 11.13/4.02  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 11
% 11.13/4.02  # Proof object generating inferences   : 6
% 11.13/4.02  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 10
% 11.13/4.02  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 11.13/4.02  # Parsed axioms                        : 2513
% 11.13/4.02  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 11.13/4.02  # Initial clauses                      : 2513
% 11.13/4.02  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 11.13/4.02  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 2513
% 11.13/4.02  # Processed clauses                    : 2856
% 11.13/4.02  # ...of these trivial                  : 163
% 11.13/4.02  # ...subsumed                          : 114
% 11.13/4.02  # ...remaining for further processing  : 2578
% 11.13/4.02  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 2
% 11.13/4.02  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 11.13/4.02  # Backward-subsumed                    : 6
% 11.13/4.02  # Backward-rewritten                   : 119
% 11.13/4.02  # Generated clauses                    : 5562
% 11.13/4.02  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 4756
% 11.13/4.02  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 5
% 11.13/4.02  # Paramodulations                      : 5560
% 11.13/4.02  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 11.13/4.02  # Equation resolutions                 : 2
% 11.13/4.02  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 11.13/4.02  # Propositional unsat check successes  : 0
% 11.13/4.02  # Current number of processed clauses  : 2451
% 11.13/4.02  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 1362
% 11.13/4.02  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 11.13/4.02  #    Negative unit clauses             : 79
% 11.13/4.02  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 1010
% 11.13/4.02  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 4241
% 11.13/4.02  # ...number of literals in the above   : 7175
% 11.13/4.02  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 11.13/4.02  # Current number of archived clauses   : 125
% 11.13/4.02  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 162716
% 11.13/4.02  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 153562
% 11.13/4.02  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 119
% 11.13/4.02  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 50220
% 11.13/4.02  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 11.13/4.02  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 2018
% 11.13/4.02  # BW rewrite match successes           : 21
% 11.13/4.02  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 11.13/4.02  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 11.13/4.02  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 90355
% 11.13/4.02  
% 11.13/4.02  # -------------------------------------------------
% 11.13/4.02  # User time                : 0.216 s
% 11.13/4.02  # System time              : 0.012 s
% 11.13/4.02  # Total time               : 0.228 s
% 11.13/4.02  # ...preprocessing         : 0.070 s
% 11.13/4.02  # ...main loop             : 0.158 s
% 11.13/4.02  # Maximum resident set size: 21124 pages
% 11.13/4.02  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------