TSTP Solution File: CSR044+1 by SPASS---3.9

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : CSR044+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 23:24:35 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.20s 0.44s
% Output   : Refutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : CSR044+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.07/0.12  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.13/0.33  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Fri Jun 10 07:09:09 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.44  
% 0.20/0.44  SPASS V 3.9 
% 0.20/0.44  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.20/0.44  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.20/0.44  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 0.20/0.44  SPASS derived 103 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 99 clauses.
% 0.20/0.44  SPASS allocated 97739 KBytes.
% 0.20/0.44  SPASS spent	0:00:00.09 on the problem.
% 0.20/0.44  		0:00:00.03 for the input.
% 0.20/0.44  		0:00:00.03 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.20/0.44  		0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.20/0.44  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.20/0.44  		0:00:00.00 for the reduction.
% 0.20/0.44  
% 0.20/0.44  
% 0.20/0.44  Here is a proof with depth 3, length 26 :
% 0.20/0.44  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.20/0.44  1[0:Inp] ||  -> mtvisible(c_tptp_member3633_mt)*.
% 0.20/0.44  3[0:Inp] ||  -> executionbyfiringsquad(c_tptpexecutionbyfiringsquad_90)*.
% 0.20/0.44  11[0:Inp] ||  -> genlmt(c_tptp_spindleheadmt,c_cyclistsmt)*r.
% 0.20/0.44  12[0:Inp] ||  -> genlmt(c_tptp_member3633_mt,c_tptp_spindleheadmt)*r.
% 0.20/0.44  23[0:Inp] || isa(u,c_tptpcol_16_29490)* -> tptpcol_16_29490(u).
% 0.20/0.44  26[0:Inp] executionbyfiringsquad(u) ||  -> isa(u,c_executionbyfiringsquad)*.
% 0.20/0.44  38[0:Inp] || genlmt(u,v)*+ -> microtheory(u)*.
% 0.20/0.44  44[0:Inp] tptpcol_16_29490(u) || tptp_9_720(c_tptpexecutionbyfiringsquad_90,u)* -> .
% 0.20/0.44  45[0:Inp] || mtvisible(c_cyclistsmt) -> relationallexists(c_tptp_9_720,c_executionbyfiringsquad,c_tptpcol_16_29490)*.
% 0.20/0.44  55[0:Inp] mtvisible(u) || genlmt(u,v)*+ -> mtvisible(v)*.
% 0.20/0.44  65[0:Inp] executionbyfiringsquad(u) || mtvisible(c_cyclistsmt) -> tptp_9_720(u,f_relationallexistsfn(u,c_tptp_9_720,c_executionbyfiringsquad,c_tptpcol_16_29490))*.
% 0.20/0.44  66[0:Inp] || isa(u,v) relationallexists(w,v,x) -> isa(f_relationallexistsfn(u,w,v,x),x)*.
% 0.20/0.44  117[0:Res:12.0,38.0] ||  -> microtheory(c_tptp_member3633_mt)*.
% 0.20/0.44  157[0:Res:65.2,44.1] executionbyfiringsquad(c_tptpexecutionbyfiringsquad_90) tptpcol_16_29490(f_relationallexistsfn(c_tptpexecutionbyfiringsquad_90,c_tptp_9_720,c_executionbyfiringsquad,c_tptpcol_16_29490)) || mtvisible(c_cyclistsmt)* -> .
% 0.20/0.44  158[0:SSi:157.0,3.0] tptpcol_16_29490(f_relationallexistsfn(c_tptpexecutionbyfiringsquad_90,c_tptp_9_720,c_executionbyfiringsquad,c_tptpcol_16_29490)) || mtvisible(c_cyclistsmt)* -> .
% 0.20/0.44  159[0:Res:12.0,55.1] mtvisible(c_tptp_member3633_mt) ||  -> mtvisible(c_tptp_spindleheadmt)*.
% 0.20/0.44  160[0:Res:11.0,55.1] mtvisible(c_tptp_spindleheadmt) ||  -> mtvisible(c_cyclistsmt)*.
% 0.20/0.44  178[0:SSi:159.0,1.0,117.0] ||  -> mtvisible(c_tptp_spindleheadmt)*.
% 0.20/0.44  179[0:MRR:160.0,178.0] ||  -> mtvisible(c_cyclistsmt)*.
% 0.20/0.44  180[0:MRR:45.0,179.0] ||  -> relationallexists(c_tptp_9_720,c_executionbyfiringsquad,c_tptpcol_16_29490)*.
% 0.20/0.44  185[0:MRR:158.1,179.0] tptpcol_16_29490(f_relationallexistsfn(c_tptpexecutionbyfiringsquad_90,c_tptp_9_720,c_executionbyfiringsquad,c_tptpcol_16_29490)) ||  -> .
% 0.20/0.44  200[0:Res:66.2,23.0] || isa(u,v) relationallexists(w,v,c_tptpcol_16_29490) -> tptpcol_16_29490(f_relationallexistsfn(u,w,v,c_tptpcol_16_29490))*.
% 0.20/0.44  204[0:SoR:185.0,200.2] || relationallexists(c_tptp_9_720,c_executionbyfiringsquad,c_tptpcol_16_29490)* isa(c_tptpexecutionbyfiringsquad_90,c_executionbyfiringsquad) -> .
% 0.20/0.44  205[0:MRR:204.0,180.0] || isa(c_tptpexecutionbyfiringsquad_90,c_executionbyfiringsquad)* -> .
% 0.20/0.44  206[0:Res:26.1,205.0] executionbyfiringsquad(c_tptpexecutionbyfiringsquad_90) ||  -> .
% 0.20/0.44  207[0:SSi:206.0,3.0] ||  -> .
% 0.20/0.44  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.20/0.44  Formulae used in the proof : query44 just12 just8 just9 just31 just34 just52 just11 just48 just10 just1
% 0.20/0.44  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------