TSTP Solution File: CSR044+1 by SOS---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : CSR044+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 23:21:28 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 3.22s 3.39s
% Output   : Refutation 3.22s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.13  % Problem  : CSR044+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.08/0.14  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.15/0.36  % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.15/0.36  % DateTime : Fri Jun 10 07:14:21 EDT 2022
% 0.15/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.15/0.38  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.15/0.38  The process was started by sandbox2 on n025.cluster.edu,
% 0.15/0.38  Fri Jun 10 07:14:21 2022
% 0.15/0.38  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 8667.
% 0.15/0.38  
% 0.15/0.38  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.15/0.38  set(auto).
% 0.15/0.38     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.15/0.38     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.15/0.38     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.15/0.38     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.15/0.38     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.15/0.38     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.15/0.38     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.15/0.38     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.15/0.38     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.15/0.38     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.15/0.38     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.15/0.38     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.15/0.38     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.15/0.38  clear(print_given).
% 0.15/0.38  
% 0.15/0.38  formula_list(usable).
% 0.15/0.38  
% 0.15/0.38  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=3.
% 0.15/0.38  
% 0.15/0.38  This is a Horn set without equality.  The strategy will
% 0.15/0.38  be hyperresolution, with satellites in sos and nuclei
% 0.15/0.38  in usable.
% 0.15/0.38  
% 0.15/0.38     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.15/0.38     dependent: clear(order_hyper).
% 0.15/0.38  
% 0.15/0.38  ------------> process usable:
% 0.15/0.38    Following clause subsumed by 6 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -genlpreds(A,B)|predicate(B).
% 0.15/0.38    Following clause subsumed by 7 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -genlpreds(A,B)|predicate(A).
% 0.15/0.38    Following clause subsumed by 9 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -predicate(A)|genlpreds(A,A).
% 0.15/0.38    Following clause subsumed by 30 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -isa(A,B)|collection(B).
% 0.15/0.38    Following clause subsumed by 31 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -isa(A,B)|thing(A).
% 0.15/0.38    Following clause subsumed by 34 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -genlmt(A,B)|microtheory(B).
% 0.15/0.38    Following clause subsumed by 35 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -genlmt(A,B)|microtheory(A).
% 0.15/0.38    Following clause subsumed by 37 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -microtheory(A)|genlmt(A,A).
% 0.15/0.38  
% 0.15/0.38  ------------> process sos:
% 0.15/0.38  
% 0.15/0.38  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.15/0.41  
% 0.15/0.41  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.15/0.41  
% 0.15/0.41  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.15/0.41  
% 0.15/0.41  
% 0.15/0.41  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.15/0.41  
% 0.15/0.41  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.15/0.41  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.15/0.41  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.15/0.41  number of clauses in intial UL: 40
% 0.15/0.41  number of clauses initially in problem: 58
% 0.15/0.41  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 68
% 0.15/0.41  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 66
% 0.15/0.41  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.15/0.41  absolute distinct symbol count: 42
% 0.15/0.41     distinct predicate count: 23
% 0.15/0.41     distinct function count: 1
% 0.15/0.41     distinct constant count: 18
% 0.15/0.41  
% 0.15/0.41  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.15/0.41  
% 0.15/0.41  
% 0.15/0.41  
% 0.15/0.41  =========== start of search ===========
% 3.22/3.39  
% 3.22/3.39  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 3.22/3.39  % SZS status Theorem
% 3.22/3.39  % SZS output start Refutation
% 3.22/3.39  
% 3.22/3.39  Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 3.22/3.39  
% 3.22/3.39  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 3.22/3.39  
% 3.22/3.39  Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 3.22/3.39  
% 3.22/3.39  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 3.22/3.39  
% 3.22/3.39  Model 4 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 3.22/3.39  
% 3.22/3.39  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 3.22/3.39  
% 3.22/3.39  Model 5 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 3.22/3.39  
% 3.22/3.39  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 3.22/3.39  
% 3.22/3.39  Model 6 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 3.22/3.39  
% 3.22/3.39  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 3.22/3.39  
% 3.22/3.39  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 3.22/3.39  
% 3.22/3.39  Model 7 [ 1 1 707 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 3.22/3.39  
% 3.22/3.39  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 3.22/3.39  
% 3.22/3.39  Model 8 [ 3 0 369 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 3.22/3.39  
% 3.22/3.39  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 3.22/3.39  
% 3.22/3.39  Model 9 [ 1 1 367 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 3.22/3.39  
% 3.22/3.39  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 3.22/3.39  
% 3.22/3.39  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 3.22/3.39  
% 3.22/3.39  Model 10 [ 1 1 408 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 3.22/3.39  
% 3.22/3.39  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 3.22/3.39  
% 3.22/3.39  Model 11 [ 1 1 1662 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 3.22/3.39  
% 3.22/3.39  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 3.22/3.39  
% 3.22/3.39  Model 12 [ 2 0 394 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 3.22/3.39  
% 3.22/3.39  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 3.22/3.39  
% 3.22/3.39  Model 13 [ 7 0 299 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 3.22/3.39  
% 3.22/3.39  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 3.22/3.39  
% 3.22/3.39  Model 14 [ 1 1 351 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 3.22/3.39  
% 3.22/3.39  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 3.22/3.39  
% 3.22/3.39  Model 15 [ 1 0 714 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 3.22/3.39  
% 3.22/3.39  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 3.22/3.39  
% 3.22/3.39  Model 16 [ 4 1 471 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 3.22/3.39  
% 3.22/3.39  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 3.22/3.39  
% 3.22/3.39  Model 17 [ 4 1 5148 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 3.22/3.39  
% 3.22/3.39  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 3.22/3.39  
% 3.22/3.39  Model 18 [ 2 1 1448 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 3.22/3.39  
% 3.22/3.39  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 3.22/3.39  
% 3.22/3.39  Model 19 [ 2 0 709 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 3.22/3.39  
% 3.22/3.39  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 3.22/3.39  
% 3.22/3.39  Model 20 [ 8 0 2485 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 3.22/3.39  
% 3.22/3.39  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 3.22/3.39  
% 3.22/3.39  Model 21 [ 2 1 5032 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 3.22/3.39  
% 3.22/3.39  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 3.22/3.39  
% 3.22/3.39  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 3.22/3.39  
% 3.22/3.39  Model 22 [ 6 1 5883 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 3.22/3.39  
% 3.22/3.39  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 3.22/3.39  
% 3.22/3.39  Model 23 [ 77 9 136840 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 3.22/3.39  
% 3.22/3.39  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 3.22/3.39  
% 3.22/3.39  Model 24 [ 22 1 2840 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 3.22/3.39  
% 3.22/3.39  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 3.22/3.39  
% 3.22/3.39  Model 25 [ 2 1 4666 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 3.22/3.39  
% 3.22/3.39  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 3.22/3.39  
% 3.22/3.39  Model 26 [ 2 1 10841 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 3.22/3.39  
% 3.22/3.39  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 3.22/3.39  
% 3.22/3.39  Model 27 [ 84 7 211720 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 3.22/3.39  
% 3.22/3.39  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 3.22/3.39  
% 3.22/3.39  Model 28 [ 75 7 214262 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 3.22/3.39  
% 3.22/3.39  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 3.22/3.39  
% 3.22/3.39  Model 29 [ 20 7 108065 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 3.22/3.39  
% 3.22/3.39  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 3.22/3.39  
% 3.22/3.39  Model 30 [ 151 10 205064 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 3.22/3.39  
% 3.22/3.39  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 3.22/3.39  
% 3.22/3.39  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 3.22/3.39  
% 3.22/3.39  Model 31 [ 61 5 22070 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 3.22/3.39  
% 3.22/3.39  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 3.22/3.39  
% 3.22/3.39  Model 32 [ 130 10 230626 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 3.22/3.39  
% 3.22/3.39  -----> EMPTY CLAUSE at   2.98 sec ----> 107 [hyper,106,40,82] {-} $F.
% 3.22/3.39  
% 3.22/3.39  Length of proof is 7.  Level of proof is 5.
% 3.22/3.39  
% 3.22/3.39  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 3.22/3.39  % SZS status Theorem
% 3.22/3.39  % SZS output start Refutation
% 3.22/3.39  
% 3.22/3.39  1 [] {+} -isa(A,B)| -relationallexists(C,B,D)|isa(f_relationallexistsfn(A,C,B,D),D).
% 3.22/3.39  2 [] {+} -mtvisible(c_cyclistsmt)| -executionbyfiringsquad(A)|tptp_9_720(A,f_relationallexistsfn(A,c_tptp_9_720,c_executionbyfiringsquad,c_tptpcol_16_29490)).
% 3.22/3.39  3 [] {+} -mtvisible(c_cyclistsmt)|relationallexists(c_tptp_9_720,c_executionbyfiringsquad,c_tptpcol_16_29490).
% 3.22/3.39  19 [] {+} -isa(A,c_tptpcol_16_29490)|tptpcol_16_29490(A).
% 3.22/3.39  22 [] {+} -executionbyfiringsquad(A)|isa(A,c_executionbyfiringsquad).
% 3.22/3.39  33 [] {+} -mtvisible(A)| -genlmt(A,B)|mtvisible(B).
% 3.22/3.39  40 [] {+} -tptp_9_720(c_tptpexecutionbyfiringsquad_90,A)| -tptpcol_16_29490(A).
% 3.22/3.39  47 [] {+} genlmt(c_tptp_spindleheadmt,c_cyclistsmt).
% 3.22/3.39  48 [] {-} genlmt(c_tptp_member3633_mt,c_tptp_spindleheadmt).
% 3.22/3.39  49 [] {+} executionbyfiringsquad(c_tptpexecutionbyfiringsquad_90).
% 3.22/3.39  58 [] {+} mtvisible(c_tptp_member3633_mt).
% 3.22/3.39  62 [hyper,49,22] {+} isa(c_tptpexecutionbyfiringsquad_90,c_executionbyfiringsquad).
% 3.22/3.39  73 [hyper,48,33,58] {+} mtvisible(c_tptp_spindleheadmt).
% 3.22/3.39  78 [hyper,73,33,47] {+} mtvisible(c_cyclistsmt).
% 3.22/3.39  81 [hyper,78,3] {+} relationallexists(c_tptp_9_720,c_executionbyfiringsquad,c_tptpcol_16_29490).
% 3.22/3.39  82 [hyper,78,2,49] {-} tptp_9_720(c_tptpexecutionbyfiringsquad_90,f_relationallexistsfn(c_tptpexecutionbyfiringsquad_90,c_tptp_9_720,c_executionbyfiringsquad,c_tptpcol_16_29490)).
% 3.22/3.39  99 [hyper,81,1,62] {+} isa(f_relationallexistsfn(c_tptpexecutionbyfiringsquad_90,c_tptp_9_720,c_executionbyfiringsquad,c_tptpcol_16_29490),c_tptpcol_16_29490).
% 3.22/3.39  106 [hyper,99,19] {+} tptpcol_16_29490(f_relationallexistsfn(c_tptpexecutionbyfiringsquad_90,c_tptp_9_720,c_executionbyfiringsquad,c_tptpcol_16_29490)).
% 3.22/3.39  107 [hyper,106,40,82] {-} $F.
% 3.22/3.39  
% 3.22/3.39  % SZS output end Refutation
% 3.22/3.39  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 3.22/3.39  
% 3.22/3.39  
% 3.22/3.39  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 3.22/3.39  
% 3.22/3.39  
% 3.22/3.39  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 3.22/3.39  
% 3.22/3.39  ============ end of search ============
% 3.22/3.39  
% 3.22/3.39  ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 3.22/3.39  
% 3.22/3.39  true clauses given          30      (45.5%)
% 3.22/3.39  false clauses given         36
% 3.22/3.39  
% 3.22/3.39        FALSE     TRUE
% 3.22/3.39  tot:  0         0      (-nan% true)
% 3.22/3.39  
% 3.22/3.39  
% 3.22/3.39  Model 32 [ 130 10 230626 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 3.22/3.39  
% 3.22/3.39  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 3.22/3.39  
% 3.22/3.39  Process 8667 finished Fri Jun 10 07:14:24 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------