TSTP Solution File: CSR044+1 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : CSR044+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 02:46:55 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 7.82s 2.46s
% Output : CNFRefutation 7.82s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 11
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 32 ( 16 unt; 0 nHn; 32 RR)
% Number of literals : 54 ( 0 equ; 25 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 8 ( 7 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 7 con; 0-4 aty)
% Number of variables : 22 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_48,plain,
( mtvisible(X1)
| ~ mtvisible(X2)
| ~ genlmt(X2,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-9z51xz7u/input.p',i_0_48) ).
cnf(i_0_9,plain,
genlmt(c_tptp_member3633_mt,c_tptp_spindleheadmt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-9z51xz7u/input.p',i_0_9) ).
cnf(i_0_66,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_tptp_member3633_mt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-9z51xz7u/input.p',i_0_66) ).
cnf(i_0_8,plain,
genlmt(c_tptp_spindleheadmt,c_cyclistsmt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-9z51xz7u/input.p',i_0_8) ).
cnf(i_0_11,plain,
( relationallexists(c_tptp_9_720,c_executionbyfiringsquad,c_tptpcol_16_29490)
| ~ mtvisible(c_cyclistsmt) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-9z51xz7u/input.p',i_0_11) ).
cnf(i_0_10,plain,
( tptp_9_720(X1,f_relationallexistsfn(X1,c_tptp_9_720,c_executionbyfiringsquad,c_tptpcol_16_29490))
| ~ executionbyfiringsquad(X1)
| ~ mtvisible(c_cyclistsmt) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-9z51xz7u/input.p',i_0_10) ).
cnf(i_0_1,plain,
( isa(f_relationallexistsfn(X1,X2,X3,X4),X4)
| ~ isa(X1,X3)
| ~ relationallexists(X2,X3,X4) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-9z51xz7u/input.p',i_0_1) ).
cnf(i_0_34,plain,
( isa(X1,c_executionbyfiringsquad)
| ~ executionbyfiringsquad(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-9z51xz7u/input.p',i_0_34) ).
cnf(i_0_12,plain,
executionbyfiringsquad(c_tptpexecutionbyfiringsquad_90),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-9z51xz7u/input.p',i_0_12) ).
cnf(i_0_65,negated_conjecture,
( ~ tptpcol_16_29490(X1)
| ~ tptp_9_720(c_tptpexecutionbyfiringsquad_90,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-9z51xz7u/input.p',i_0_65) ).
cnf(i_0_31,plain,
( tptpcol_16_29490(X1)
| ~ isa(X1,c_tptpcol_16_29490) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-9z51xz7u/input.p',i_0_31) ).
cnf(c_0_78,plain,
( mtvisible(X1)
| ~ mtvisible(X2)
| ~ genlmt(X2,X1) ),
i_0_48 ).
cnf(c_0_79,plain,
genlmt(c_tptp_member3633_mt,c_tptp_spindleheadmt),
i_0_9 ).
cnf(c_0_80,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_tptp_member3633_mt),
i_0_66 ).
cnf(c_0_81,plain,
genlmt(c_tptp_spindleheadmt,c_cyclistsmt),
i_0_8 ).
cnf(c_0_82,plain,
mtvisible(c_tptp_spindleheadmt),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_78,c_0_79]),c_0_80])]) ).
cnf(c_0_83,plain,
( relationallexists(c_tptp_9_720,c_executionbyfiringsquad,c_tptpcol_16_29490)
| ~ mtvisible(c_cyclistsmt) ),
i_0_11 ).
cnf(c_0_84,plain,
mtvisible(c_cyclistsmt),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_78,c_0_81]),c_0_82])]) ).
cnf(c_0_85,plain,
( tptp_9_720(X1,f_relationallexistsfn(X1,c_tptp_9_720,c_executionbyfiringsquad,c_tptpcol_16_29490))
| ~ executionbyfiringsquad(X1)
| ~ mtvisible(c_cyclistsmt) ),
i_0_10 ).
cnf(c_0_86,plain,
( isa(f_relationallexistsfn(X1,X2,X3,X4),X4)
| ~ isa(X1,X3)
| ~ relationallexists(X2,X3,X4) ),
i_0_1 ).
cnf(c_0_87,plain,
relationallexists(c_tptp_9_720,c_executionbyfiringsquad,c_tptpcol_16_29490),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_83,c_0_84])]) ).
cnf(c_0_88,plain,
( isa(X1,c_executionbyfiringsquad)
| ~ executionbyfiringsquad(X1) ),
i_0_34 ).
cnf(c_0_89,plain,
executionbyfiringsquad(c_tptpexecutionbyfiringsquad_90),
i_0_12 ).
cnf(c_0_90,plain,
( tptp_9_720(X1,f_relationallexistsfn(X1,c_tptp_9_720,c_executionbyfiringsquad,c_tptpcol_16_29490))
| ~ executionbyfiringsquad(X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_85,c_0_84])]) ).
cnf(c_0_91,plain,
( isa(f_relationallexistsfn(X1,c_tptp_9_720,c_executionbyfiringsquad,c_tptpcol_16_29490),c_tptpcol_16_29490)
| ~ isa(X1,c_executionbyfiringsquad) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_86,c_0_87]) ).
cnf(c_0_92,plain,
isa(c_tptpexecutionbyfiringsquad_90,c_executionbyfiringsquad),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_88,c_0_89]) ).
cnf(c_0_93,negated_conjecture,
( ~ tptpcol_16_29490(X1)
| ~ tptp_9_720(c_tptpexecutionbyfiringsquad_90,X1) ),
i_0_65 ).
cnf(c_0_94,plain,
tptp_9_720(c_tptpexecutionbyfiringsquad_90,f_relationallexistsfn(c_tptpexecutionbyfiringsquad_90,c_tptp_9_720,c_executionbyfiringsquad,c_tptpcol_16_29490)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_90,c_0_89]) ).
cnf(c_0_95,plain,
( tptpcol_16_29490(X1)
| ~ isa(X1,c_tptpcol_16_29490) ),
i_0_31 ).
cnf(c_0_96,plain,
isa(f_relationallexistsfn(c_tptpexecutionbyfiringsquad_90,c_tptp_9_720,c_executionbyfiringsquad,c_tptpcol_16_29490),c_tptpcol_16_29490),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_91,c_0_92]) ).
cnf(c_0_97,negated_conjecture,
~ tptpcol_16_29490(f_relationallexistsfn(c_tptpexecutionbyfiringsquad_90,c_tptp_9_720,c_executionbyfiringsquad,c_tptpcol_16_29490)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_93,c_0_94]) ).
cnf(c_0_98,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_95,c_0_96]),c_0_97]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12 % Problem : CSR044+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.06/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Fri Jun 10 07:19:45 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.44 # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 7.82/2.46 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule:
% 7.82/2.46 # No SInE strategy applied
% 7.82/2.46 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 7.82/2.46 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_S0e
% 7.82/2.46 # and selection function SelectLargestNegLit.
% 7.82/2.46 #
% 7.82/2.46 # Preprocessing time : 0.023 s
% 7.82/2.46
% 7.82/2.46 # Proof found!
% 7.82/2.46 # SZS status Theorem
% 7.82/2.46 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.82/2.46 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.82/2.46
% 7.82/2.46 # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.82/2.46 # User time : 0.028 s
% 7.82/2.46 # System time : 0.005 s
% 7.82/2.46 # Total time : 0.033 s
% 7.82/2.46 # Maximum resident set size: 7120 pages
% 7.82/2.46
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------