TSTP Solution File: CSR042+2 by Vampire-SAT---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire-SAT---4.8
% Problem : CSR042+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s
% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun May 5 04:57:57 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.21s 0.43s
% Output : Refutation 0.21s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 22 ( 5 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 39 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 30 ( 13 ~; 8 |; 1 &)
% ( 2 <=>; 6 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 5 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 4 usr; 3 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 3 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 13 ( 10 !; 3 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f6007,plain,
$false,
inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[f3963,f4063,f6006]) ).
fof(f6006,plain,
~ spl0_51,
inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f6005]) ).
fof(f6005,plain,
( $false
| ~ spl0_51 ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f6004,f2687]) ).
fof(f2687,plain,
! [X0] : ~ borderson(X0,c_georegion_l4_x27_y64),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1889]) ).
fof(f1889,plain,
! [X0] :
( ~ borderson(X0,c_georegion_l4_x27_y64)
& mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f1134]) ).
fof(f1134,plain,
~ ? [X0] :
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
=> borderson(X0,c_georegion_l4_x27_y64) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f1133]) ).
fof(f1133,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X4] :
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
=> borderson(X4,c_georegion_l4_x27_y64) ),
inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f1132]) ).
fof(f1132,conjecture,
? [X4] :
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
=> borderson(X4,c_georegion_l4_x27_y64) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query92) ).
fof(f6004,plain,
( borderson(c_georegion_l4_x27_y65,c_georegion_l4_x27_y64)
| ~ spl0_51 ),
inference(resolution,[],[f3649,f3962]) ).
fof(f3962,plain,
( borderson(c_georegion_l4_x27_y64,c_georegion_l4_x27_y65)
| ~ spl0_51 ),
inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f3960]) ).
fof(f3960,plain,
( spl0_51
<=> borderson(c_georegion_l4_x27_y64,c_georegion_l4_x27_y65) ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_51])]) ).
fof(f3649,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ~ borderson(X0,X1)
| borderson(X1,X0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2580]) ).
fof(f2580,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( borderson(X1,X0)
| ~ borderson(X0,X1) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f1686]) ).
fof(f1686,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( borderson(X0,X1)
=> borderson(X1,X0) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f900]) ).
fof(f900,axiom,
! [X12,X13] :
( borderson(X12,X13)
=> borderson(X13,X12) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax1_900) ).
fof(f4063,plain,
spl0_48,
inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f2686,f3946]) ).
fof(f3946,plain,
( spl0_48
<=> mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt) ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_48])]) ).
fof(f2686,plain,
mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1889]) ).
fof(f3963,plain,
( ~ spl0_48
| spl0_51 ),
inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f2994,f3960,f3946]) ).
fof(f2994,plain,
( borderson(c_georegion_l4_x27_y64,c_georegion_l4_x27_y65)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1922]) ).
fof(f1922,plain,
( borderson(c_georegion_l4_x27_y64,c_georegion_l4_x27_y65)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f122]) ).
fof(f122,axiom,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
=> borderson(c_georegion_l4_x27_y64,c_georegion_l4_x27_y65) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax1_122) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : CSR042+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.07/0.14 % Command : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s
% 0.15/0.35 % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.35 % DateTime : Fri May 3 20:11:53 EDT 2024
% 0.15/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.36 % (11820)Running in auto input_syntax mode. Trying TPTP
% 0.15/0.40 % (11821)fmb+10_1_fmbas=off:fmbsr=1.3:nm=2_1451 on theBenchmark for (1451ds/0Mi)
% 0.15/0.40 % (11823)dis-2_2:3_amm=sco:anc=none:bce=on:fsr=off:gsp=on:nm=16:nwc=1.2:nicw=on:sac=on:sp=weighted_frequency_476 on theBenchmark for (476ds/0Mi)
% 0.15/0.40 % (11822)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbas=expand:fmbksg=on:fmbsr=1.3_569 on theBenchmark for (569ds/0Mi)
% 0.15/0.40 % (11824)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbas=expand:fmbksg=on:fmbsr=1.3:gsp=on:nm=4_470 on theBenchmark for (470ds/0Mi)
% 0.15/0.40 % (11825)dis+1_20_av=off:lcm=predicate:nm=2:nwc=2.0_396 on theBenchmark for (396ds/0Mi)
% 0.15/0.40 % (11826)dis+11_4:5_nm=4_216 on theBenchmark for (216ds/0Mi)
% 0.15/0.40 % (11827)fmb+10_1_fmbas=off:fmbsr=1.3:nm=2:si=on:rtra=on:rawr=on:rp=on:fmbksg=on_1451 on theBenchmark for (1451ds/0Mi)
% 0.21/0.42 TRYING [1]
% 0.21/0.43 TRYING [2]
% 0.21/0.43 TRYING [1]
% 0.21/0.43 % (11826)First to succeed.
% 0.21/0.43 TRYING [2]
% 0.21/0.43 % (11826)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-11820"
% 0.21/0.43 % (11826)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.21/0.43 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.21/0.43 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.43 % (11826)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.43 % (11826)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.21/0.43 % (11826)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.21/0.43
% 0.21/0.43 % (11826)Memory used [KB]: 2773
% 0.21/0.43 % (11826)Time elapsed: 0.033 s
% 0.21/0.43 % (11826)Instructions burned: 61 (million)
% 0.21/0.43 % (11820)Success in time 0.075 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------