TSTP Solution File: CSR042+2 by E-SAT---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem : CSR042+2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon May 20 19:17:30 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.33s 0.60s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.33s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 13 ( 4 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 22 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 16 ( 7 ~; 4 |; 1 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 4 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 5 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 3 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 10 ( 1 sgn 5 !; 2 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query92,conjecture,
? [X5] :
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
=> borderson(X5,c_georegion_l4_x27_y64) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query92) ).
fof(ax1_122,axiom,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
=> borderson(c_georegion_l4_x27_y64,c_georegion_l4_x27_y65) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_122) ).
fof(ax1_900,axiom,
! [X13,X14] :
( borderson(X13,X14)
=> borderson(X14,X13) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_900) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X5] :
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
=> borderson(X5,c_georegion_l4_x27_y64) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query92]) ).
fof(c_0_4,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
| borderson(c_georegion_l4_x27_y64,c_georegion_l4_x27_y65) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax1_122])]) ).
fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
! [X22] :
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
& ~ borderson(X22,c_georegion_l4_x27_y64) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])]) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X27,X28] :
( ~ borderson(X27,X28)
| borderson(X28,X27) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax1_900])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( borderson(c_georegion_l4_x27_y64,c_georegion_l4_x27_y65)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( borderson(X2,X1)
| ~ borderson(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
borderson(c_georegion_l4_x27_y64,c_georegion_l4_x27_y65),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8])]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
~ borderson(X1,c_georegion_l4_x27_y64),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_11]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.09/0.16 % Problem : CSR042+2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.09/0.18 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.39 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.39 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.39 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.39 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.39 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.39 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.39 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.39 % DateTime : Sun May 19 01:08:23 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.39 % CPUTime :
% 0.32/0.56 Running first-order model finding
% 0.32/0.56 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.33/0.60 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.33/0.60 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.33/0.60 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.33/0.60 # Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 900s (3) cores
% 0.33/0.60 # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.33/0.60 # Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.33/0.60 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.33/0.60 # sh5l with pid 10078 completed with status 0
% 0.33/0.60 # Result found by sh5l
% 0.33/0.60 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.33/0.60 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.33/0.60 # Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 900s (3) cores
% 0.33/0.60 # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.33/0.60 # Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.33/0.60 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.33/0.60 # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.33/0.60 # Search class: FHHNF-FFMM31-SFFFFFNN
% 0.33/0.60 # partial match(1): FHHNF-FFMM11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.33/0.60 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.33/0.60 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.33/0.60 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 10083 completed with status 0
% 0.33/0.60 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.33/0.60 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.33/0.60 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.33/0.60 # Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 900s (3) cores
% 0.33/0.60 # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.33/0.60 # Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.33/0.60 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.33/0.60 # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.33/0.60 # Search class: FHHNF-FFMM31-SFFFFFNN
% 0.33/0.60 # partial match(1): FHHNF-FFMM11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.33/0.60 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.33/0.60 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.33/0.60 # Preprocessing time : 0.004 s
% 0.33/0.60 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.33/0.60
% 0.33/0.60 # Proof found!
% 0.33/0.60 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.33/0.60 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.33/0.60 # Parsed axioms : 1132
% 0.33/0.60 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 1047
% 0.33/0.60 # Initial clauses : 86
% 0.33/0.60 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.33/0.60 # Initial clauses in saturation : 86
% 0.33/0.60 # Processed clauses : 188
% 0.33/0.60 # ...of these trivial : 2
% 0.33/0.60 # ...subsumed : 3
% 0.33/0.60 # ...remaining for further processing : 183
% 0.33/0.60 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.33/0.60 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.33/0.60 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.33/0.60 # Backward-rewritten : 8
% 0.33/0.60 # Generated clauses : 67
% 0.33/0.60 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 63
% 0.33/0.60 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.33/0.60 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.33/0.60 # Paramodulations : 67
% 0.33/0.60 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.33/0.60 # NegExts : 0
% 0.33/0.60 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.33/0.60 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.33/0.60 # Total rewrite steps : 17
% 0.33/0.60 # ...of those cached : 12
% 0.33/0.60 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.33/0.60 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.33/0.60 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.33/0.60 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.33/0.60 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.33/0.60 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.33/0.60 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.33/0.60 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.33/0.60 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.33/0.60 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.33/0.60 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.33/0.60 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.33/0.60 # Current number of processed clauses : 91
% 0.33/0.60 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 31
% 0.33/0.60 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.33/0.60 # Negative unit clauses : 5
% 0.33/0.60 # Non-unit-clauses : 55
% 0.33/0.60 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 45
% 0.33/0.60 # ...number of literals in the above : 86
% 0.33/0.60 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.33/0.60 # Current number of archived clauses : 92
% 0.33/0.60 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1306
% 0.33/0.60 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1265
% 0.33/0.60 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 2
% 0.33/0.60 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 172
% 0.33/0.60 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.33/0.60 # BW rewrite match attempts : 2
% 0.33/0.60 # BW rewrite match successes : 2
% 0.33/0.60 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.33/0.60 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.33/0.60 # Termbank termtop insertions : 11737
% 0.33/0.60 # Search garbage collected termcells : 5048
% 0.33/0.60
% 0.33/0.60 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.33/0.60 # User time : 0.014 s
% 0.33/0.60 # System time : 0.004 s
% 0.33/0.60 # Total time : 0.018 s
% 0.33/0.60 # Maximum resident set size: 4180 pages
% 0.33/0.60
% 0.33/0.60 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.33/0.60 # User time : 0.027 s
% 0.33/0.60 # System time : 0.006 s
% 0.33/0.60 # Total time : 0.033 s
% 0.33/0.60 # Maximum resident set size: 2648 pages
% 0.33/0.60 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------