TSTP Solution File: CSR041+1 by E-SAT---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem : CSR041+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat May 4 07:35:20 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.21s 0.49s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.21s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 15 ( 6 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 24 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 17 ( 8 ~; 4 |; 1 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 4 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 4 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-1 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 12 ( 2 sgn 8 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query41,conjecture,
( mtvisible(c_tptp_member2831_mt)
=> aspatialthing(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_wwwinformationblastcomtechnical_university_of_munichhtml)),c_translation_3)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.c54SegYQaN/E---3.1_16910.p',query41) ).
fof(just2,axiom,
! [X1] :
( aspatialinformationstore(X1)
=> aspatialthing(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.c54SegYQaN/E---3.1_16910.p',just2) ).
fof(just4,axiom,
! [X1] :
( microtheory(X1)
=> aspatialinformationstore(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.c54SegYQaN/E---3.1_16910.p',just4) ).
fof(just41,axiom,
! [X7,X9] : microtheory(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(X7,X9)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.c54SegYQaN/E---3.1_16910.p',just41) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
~ ( mtvisible(c_tptp_member2831_mt)
=> aspatialthing(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_wwwinformationblastcomtechnical_university_of_munichhtml)),c_translation_3)) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query41]) ).
fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
( mtvisible(c_tptp_member2831_mt)
& ~ aspatialthing(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_wwwinformationblastcomtechnical_university_of_munichhtml)),c_translation_3)) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])]) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X17] :
( ~ aspatialinformationstore(X17)
| aspatialthing(X17) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[just2])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
~ aspatialthing(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_wwwinformationblastcomtechnical_university_of_munichhtml)),c_translation_3)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( aspatialthing(X1)
| ~ aspatialinformationstore(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
fof(c_0_9,plain,
! [X24] :
( ~ microtheory(X24)
| aspatialinformationstore(X24) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[just4])])]) ).
fof(c_0_10,plain,
! [X20,X21] : microtheory(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(X20,X21)),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[just41]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
~ aspatialinformationstore(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_wwwinformationblastcomtechnical_university_of_munichhtml)),c_translation_3)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( aspatialinformationstore(X1)
| ~ microtheory(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
microtheory(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(X1,X2)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]),c_0_13])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12 % Problem : CSR041+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.11/0.14 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.34 % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % DateTime : Fri May 3 14:52:53 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.48 Running first-order model finding
% 0.21/0.48 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.c54SegYQaN/E---3.1_16910.p
% 0.21/0.49 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.21/0.49 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.49 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.49 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.49 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.49 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.49 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.49 # new_bool_3 with pid 16992 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.21/0.49 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.49 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.49 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.49 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.49 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.21/0.49 # Search class: FHUNF-FFSM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.49 # partial match(1): FHUNF-FFSM21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.49 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.21/0.49 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 181s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.49 # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with pid 16995 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04BN
% 0.21/0.49 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.49 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.49 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.49 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.49 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.21/0.49 # Search class: FHUNF-FFSM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.49 # partial match(1): FHUNF-FFSM21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.49 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.21/0.49 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 181s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.49 # Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 0.21/0.49 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.21/0.49
% 0.21/0.49 # Proof found!
% 0.21/0.49 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.21/0.49 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.50 # Parsed axioms : 73
% 0.21/0.50 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 34
% 0.21/0.50 # Initial clauses : 40
% 0.21/0.50 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Initial clauses in saturation : 40
% 0.21/0.50 # Processed clauses : 48
% 0.21/0.50 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # ...subsumed : 9
% 0.21/0.50 # ...remaining for further processing : 39
% 0.21/0.50 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Backward-rewritten : 1
% 0.21/0.50 # Generated clauses : 2
% 0.21/0.50 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1
% 0.21/0.50 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Paramodulations : 2
% 0.21/0.50 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # NegExts : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Total rewrite steps : 2
% 0.21/0.50 # ...of those cached : 1
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.50 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.50 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.50 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.50 # Current number of processed clauses : 8
% 0.21/0.50 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 4
% 0.21/0.50 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.21/0.50 # Non-unit-clauses : 2
% 0.21/0.50 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 23
% 0.21/0.50 # ...number of literals in the above : 42
% 0.21/0.50 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Current number of archived clauses : 31
% 0.21/0.50 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 24
% 0.21/0.50 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 24
% 0.21/0.50 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 9
% 0.21/0.50 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 0.21/0.50 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 0.21/0.50 # BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.21/0.50 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Termbank termtop insertions : 2150
% 0.21/0.50 # Search garbage collected termcells : 480
% 0.21/0.50
% 0.21/0.50 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.50 # User time : 0.007 s
% 0.21/0.50 # System time : 0.000 s
% 0.21/0.50 # Total time : 0.008 s
% 0.21/0.50 # Maximum resident set size: 1924 pages
% 0.21/0.50
% 0.21/0.50 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.50 # User time : 0.009 s
% 0.21/0.50 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.21/0.50 # Total time : 0.012 s
% 0.21/0.50 # Maximum resident set size: 1768 pages
% 0.21/0.50 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------