TSTP Solution File: CSR038+2 by SRASS---0.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SRASS---0.1
% Problem  : CSR038+2 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : SRASS -q2 -a 0 10 10 10 -i3 -n60 %s

% Computer : art06.cs.miami.edu
% Model    : i686 i686
% CPU      : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory   : 2018MB
% OS       : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Dec 28 23:09:16 EST 2010

% Result   : Theorem 123.31s
% Output   : Solution 123.31s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    : 0

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ERROR: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Reading problem from /tmp/SystemOnTPTP17792/CSR038+2.tptp
% Adding relevance values
% Extracting the conjecture
% Sorting axioms by relevance
% Looking for THM       ... 
% found
% SZS status THM for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP17792/CSR038+2.tptp
% SZS output start Solution for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP17792/CSR038+2.tptp
% TreeLimitedRun: ----------------------------------------------------------
% TreeLimitedRun: /home/graph/tptp/Systems/EP---1.2/eproof --print-statistics -xAuto -tAuto --cpu-limit=60 --proof-time-unlimited --memory-limit=Auto --tstp-in --tstp-out /tmp/SRASS.s.p 
% TreeLimitedRun: CPU time limit is 60s
% TreeLimitedRun: WC  time limit is 120s
% TreeLimitedRun: PID is 18056
% TreeLimitedRun: ----------------------------------------------------------
% PrfWatch: 0.00 CPU 0.02 WC
% PrfWatch: 1.59 CPU 2.03 WC
% PrfWatch: 3.59 CPU 4.03 WC
% # Preprocessing time     : 0.084 s
% # Problem is unsatisfiable (or provable), constructing proof object
% # SZS status Theorem
% PrfWatch: 5.57 CPU 6.04 WC
% # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% fof(14, axiom,![X6]:(isa(X6,c_tptpcol_16_7738)=>tptpcol_16_7738(X6)),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', ax1_673)).
% fof(30, axiom,relationexistsall(c_tptp_8_968,c_tptpcol_16_7738,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription)),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', ax1_245)).
% fof(110, axiom,isa(c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationtotypefnissuingaprescriptionproductscorrectivelensprescription_2804,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription)),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', ax1_134)).
% fof(402, axiom,![X16]:![X17]:![X18]:![X19]:((isa(X16,X17)&relationexistsall(X18,X19,X17))=>isa(f_relationexistsallfn(X16,X18,X19,X17),X19)),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', ax1_64)).
% fof(904, axiom,![X16]:(isa(X16,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription))=>tptp_8_968(f_relationexistsallfn(X16,c_tptp_8_968,c_tptpcol_16_7738,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription)),X16)),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', ax1_244)).
% fof(1132, conjecture,?[X6]:(mtvisible(c_knowledgefragmentd3mt)=>(tptp_8_968(X6,c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationtotypefnissuingaprescriptionproductscorrectivelensprescription_2804)&tptpcol_16_7738(X6))),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', query88)).
% fof(1133, negated_conjecture,~(?[X6]:(mtvisible(c_knowledgefragmentd3mt)=>(tptp_8_968(X6,c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationtotypefnissuingaprescriptionproductscorrectivelensprescription_2804)&tptpcol_16_7738(X6)))),inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[1132])).
% fof(1165, plain,![X6]:(~(isa(X6,c_tptpcol_16_7738))|tptpcol_16_7738(X6)),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[14])).
% fof(1166, plain,![X7]:(~(isa(X7,c_tptpcol_16_7738))|tptpcol_16_7738(X7)),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[1165])).
% cnf(1167,plain,(tptpcol_16_7738(X1)|~isa(X1,c_tptpcol_16_7738)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[1166])).
% cnf(1193,plain,(relationexistsall(c_tptp_8_968,c_tptpcol_16_7738,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription))),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[30])).
% cnf(1396,plain,(isa(c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationtotypefnissuingaprescriptionproductscorrectivelensprescription_2804,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription))),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[110])).
% fof(2113, plain,![X16]:![X17]:![X18]:![X19]:((~(isa(X16,X17))|~(relationexistsall(X18,X19,X17)))|isa(f_relationexistsallfn(X16,X18,X19,X17),X19)),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[402])).
% fof(2114, plain,![X20]:![X21]:![X22]:![X23]:((~(isa(X20,X21))|~(relationexistsall(X22,X23,X21)))|isa(f_relationexistsallfn(X20,X22,X23,X21),X23)),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[2113])).
% cnf(2115,plain,(isa(f_relationexistsallfn(X1,X2,X3,X4),X3)|~relationexistsall(X2,X3,X4)|~isa(X1,X4)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[2114])).
% fof(3445, plain,![X16]:(~(isa(X16,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription)))|tptp_8_968(f_relationexistsallfn(X16,c_tptp_8_968,c_tptpcol_16_7738,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription)),X16)),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[904])).
% fof(3446, plain,![X17]:(~(isa(X17,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription)))|tptp_8_968(f_relationexistsallfn(X17,c_tptp_8_968,c_tptpcol_16_7738,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription)),X17)),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[3445])).
% cnf(3447,plain,(tptp_8_968(f_relationexistsallfn(X1,c_tptp_8_968,c_tptpcol_16_7738,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription)),X1)|~isa(X1,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription))),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[3446])).
% fof(3864, negated_conjecture,![X6]:(mtvisible(c_knowledgefragmentd3mt)&(~(tptp_8_968(X6,c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationtotypefnissuingaprescriptionproductscorrectivelensprescription_2804))|~(tptpcol_16_7738(X6)))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[1133])).
% fof(3865, negated_conjecture,![X7]:(mtvisible(c_knowledgefragmentd3mt)&(~(tptp_8_968(X7,c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationtotypefnissuingaprescriptionproductscorrectivelensprescription_2804))|~(tptpcol_16_7738(X7)))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[3864])).
% cnf(3866,negated_conjecture,(~tptpcol_16_7738(X1)|~tptp_8_968(X1,c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationtotypefnissuingaprescriptionproductscorrectivelensprescription_2804)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[3865])).
% cnf(3869,negated_conjecture,(~tptp_8_968(X1,c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationtotypefnissuingaprescriptionproductscorrectivelensprescription_2804)|~isa(X1,c_tptpcol_16_7738)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[3866,1167,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(6251,plain,(isa(f_relationexistsallfn(X1,c_tptp_8_968,c_tptpcol_16_7738,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription)),c_tptpcol_16_7738)|~isa(X1,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription))),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[2115,1193,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(6361,negated_conjecture,(~isa(f_relationexistsallfn(c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationtotypefnissuingaprescriptionproductscorrectivelensprescription_2804,c_tptp_8_968,c_tptpcol_16_7738,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription)),c_tptpcol_16_7738)|~isa(c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationtotypefnissuingaprescriptionproductscorrectivelensprescription_2804,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription))),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[3869,3447,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(6362,negated_conjecture,(~isa(f_relationexistsallfn(c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationtotypefnissuingaprescriptionproductscorrectivelensprescription_2804,c_tptp_8_968,c_tptpcol_16_7738,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription)),c_tptpcol_16_7738)|$false),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[6361,1396,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(6363,negated_conjecture,(~isa(f_relationexistsallfn(c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationtotypefnissuingaprescriptionproductscorrectivelensprescription_2804,c_tptp_8_968,c_tptpcol_16_7738,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription)),c_tptpcol_16_7738)),inference(cn,[status(thm)],[6362,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(85646,negated_conjecture,(~isa(c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationtotypefnissuingaprescriptionproductscorrectivelensprescription_2804,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription))),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[6363,6251,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(85647,negated_conjecture,($false),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[85646,1396,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(85648,negated_conjecture,($false),inference(cn,[status(thm)],[85647,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(85649,negated_conjecture,($false),85648,['proof']).
% # SZS output end CNFRefutation
% # Processed clauses                  : 11484
% # ...of these trivial                : 884
% # ...subsumed                        : 1371
% # ...remaining for further processing: 9229
% # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% # Backward-subsumed                  : 0
% # Backward-rewritten                 : 0
% # Generated clauses                  : 71065
% # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 59113
% # Contextual simplify-reflections    : 2
% # Paramodulations                    : 71065
% # Factorizations                     : 0
% # Equation resolutions               : 0
% # Current number of processed clauses: 9229
% #    Positive orientable unit clauses: 4055
% #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% #    Negative unit clauses           : 837
% #    Non-unit-clauses                : 4337
% # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 48762
% # ...number of literals in the above : 79616
% # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 5562901
% # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 5531700
% # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 704663
% # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound  : 0
% # Indexed BW rewrite attempts        : 3
% # Indexed BW rewrite successes       : 0
% # Backwards rewriting index:  8300 leaves,   1.01+/-0.187 terms/leaf
% # Paramod-from index:         5143 leaves,   1.00+/-0.037 terms/leaf
% # Paramod-into index:         6935 leaves,   1.01+/-0.165 terms/leaf
% # -------------------------------------------------
% # User time              : 5.121 s
% # System time            : 0.117 s
% # Total time             : 5.238 s
% # Maximum resident set size: 0 pages
% PrfWatch: 6.16 CPU 6.67 WC
% FINAL PrfWatch: 6.16 CPU 6.67 WC
% SZS output end Solution for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP17792/CSR038+2.tptp
% 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------