TSTP Solution File: CSR038+2 by SInE---0.4
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SInE---0.4
% Problem : CSR038+2 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : Source/sine.py -e eprover -t %d %s
% Computer : art01.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat Dec 25 06:12:45 EST 2010
% Result : Theorem 0.86s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.86s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 13
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 30 ( 8 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 60 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 57 ( 27 ~; 20 |; 5 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 5 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 8 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 5 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 9 ( 9 usr; 7 con; 0-4 aty)
% Number of variables : 29 ( 0 sgn 20 !; 2 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(2,axiom,
relationexistsall(c_tptp_8_968,c_tptpcol_16_7738,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription)),
file('/tmp/tmpow6b-s/sel_CSR038+2.p_4',ax1_245) ).
fof(12,axiom,
! [X6,X7,X8,X9] :
( ( isa(X6,X7)
& relationexistsall(X8,X9,X7) )
=> isa(f_relationexistsallfn(X6,X8,X9,X7),X9) ),
file('/tmp/tmpow6b-s/sel_CSR038+2.p_4',ax1_64) ).
fof(41,axiom,
isa(c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationtotypefnissuingaprescriptionproductscorrectivelensprescription_2804,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription)),
file('/tmp/tmpow6b-s/sel_CSR038+2.p_4',ax1_134) ).
fof(63,axiom,
! [X6] :
( isa(X6,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription))
=> tptp_8_968(f_relationexistsallfn(X6,c_tptp_8_968,c_tptpcol_16_7738,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription)),X6) ),
file('/tmp/tmpow6b-s/sel_CSR038+2.p_4',ax1_244) ).
fof(73,axiom,
! [X5] :
( isa(X5,c_tptpcol_16_7738)
=> tptpcol_16_7738(X5) ),
file('/tmp/tmpow6b-s/sel_CSR038+2.p_4',ax1_673) ).
fof(81,conjecture,
? [X5] :
( mtvisible(c_knowledgefragmentd3mt)
=> ( tptp_8_968(X5,c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationtotypefnissuingaprescriptionproductscorrectivelensprescription_2804)
& tptpcol_16_7738(X5) ) ),
file('/tmp/tmpow6b-s/sel_CSR038+2.p_4',query88) ).
fof(82,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X5] :
( mtvisible(c_knowledgefragmentd3mt)
=> ( tptp_8_968(X5,c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationtotypefnissuingaprescriptionproductscorrectivelensprescription_2804)
& tptpcol_16_7738(X5) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[81]) ).
cnf(85,plain,
relationexistsall(c_tptp_8_968,c_tptpcol_16_7738,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[2]) ).
fof(109,plain,
! [X6,X7,X8,X9] :
( ~ isa(X6,X7)
| ~ relationexistsall(X8,X9,X7)
| isa(f_relationexistsallfn(X6,X8,X9,X7),X9) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[12]) ).
fof(110,plain,
! [X10,X11,X12,X13] :
( ~ isa(X10,X11)
| ~ relationexistsall(X12,X13,X11)
| isa(f_relationexistsallfn(X10,X12,X13,X11),X13) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[109]) ).
cnf(111,plain,
( isa(f_relationexistsallfn(X1,X2,X3,X4),X3)
| ~ relationexistsall(X2,X3,X4)
| ~ isa(X1,X4) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[110]) ).
cnf(185,plain,
isa(c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationtotypefnissuingaprescriptionproductscorrectivelensprescription_2804,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[41]) ).
fof(243,plain,
! [X6] :
( ~ isa(X6,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription))
| tptp_8_968(f_relationexistsallfn(X6,c_tptp_8_968,c_tptpcol_16_7738,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription)),X6) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[63]) ).
fof(244,plain,
! [X7] :
( ~ isa(X7,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription))
| tptp_8_968(f_relationexistsallfn(X7,c_tptp_8_968,c_tptpcol_16_7738,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription)),X7) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[243]) ).
cnf(245,plain,
( tptp_8_968(f_relationexistsallfn(X1,c_tptp_8_968,c_tptpcol_16_7738,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription)),X1)
| ~ isa(X1,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[244]) ).
fof(266,plain,
! [X5] :
( ~ isa(X5,c_tptpcol_16_7738)
| tptpcol_16_7738(X5) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[73]) ).
fof(267,plain,
! [X6] :
( ~ isa(X6,c_tptpcol_16_7738)
| tptpcol_16_7738(X6) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[266]) ).
cnf(268,plain,
( tptpcol_16_7738(X1)
| ~ isa(X1,c_tptpcol_16_7738) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[267]) ).
fof(284,negated_conjecture,
! [X5] :
( mtvisible(c_knowledgefragmentd3mt)
& ( ~ tptp_8_968(X5,c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationtotypefnissuingaprescriptionproductscorrectivelensprescription_2804)
| ~ tptpcol_16_7738(X5) ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[82]) ).
fof(285,negated_conjecture,
! [X6] :
( mtvisible(c_knowledgefragmentd3mt)
& ( ~ tptp_8_968(X6,c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationtotypefnissuingaprescriptionproductscorrectivelensprescription_2804)
| ~ tptpcol_16_7738(X6) ) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[284]) ).
cnf(286,negated_conjecture,
( ~ tptpcol_16_7738(X1)
| ~ tptp_8_968(X1,c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationtotypefnissuingaprescriptionproductscorrectivelensprescription_2804) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[285]) ).
cnf(317,negated_conjecture,
( ~ tptpcol_16_7738(f_relationexistsallfn(c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationtotypefnissuingaprescriptionproductscorrectivelensprescription_2804,c_tptp_8_968,c_tptpcol_16_7738,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription)))
| ~ isa(c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationtotypefnissuingaprescriptionproductscorrectivelensprescription_2804,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[286,245,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(319,negated_conjecture,
( ~ tptpcol_16_7738(f_relationexistsallfn(c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationtotypefnissuingaprescriptionproductscorrectivelensprescription_2804,c_tptp_8_968,c_tptpcol_16_7738,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription)))
| $false ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[317,185,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(320,negated_conjecture,
~ tptpcol_16_7738(f_relationexistsallfn(c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationtotypefnissuingaprescriptionproductscorrectivelensprescription_2804,c_tptp_8_968,c_tptpcol_16_7738,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription))),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[319,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(321,negated_conjecture,
~ isa(f_relationexistsallfn(c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationtotypefnissuingaprescriptionproductscorrectivelensprescription_2804,c_tptp_8_968,c_tptpcol_16_7738,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription)),c_tptpcol_16_7738),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[320,268,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(322,negated_conjecture,
( ~ isa(c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationtotypefnissuingaprescriptionproductscorrectivelensprescription_2804,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription))
| ~ relationexistsall(c_tptp_8_968,c_tptpcol_16_7738,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[321,111,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(323,negated_conjecture,
( $false
| ~ relationexistsall(c_tptp_8_968,c_tptpcol_16_7738,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription)) ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[322,185,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(324,negated_conjecture,
( $false
| $false ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[323,85,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(325,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[324,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(326,negated_conjecture,
$false,
325,
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% % SZS status Started for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/CSR/CSR038+2.p
% --creating new selector for [CSR002+1.ax]
% -running prover on /tmp/tmpow6b-s/sel_CSR038+2.p_1 with time limit 29
% -prover status CounterSatisfiable
% -running prover on /tmp/tmpow6b-s/sel_CSR038+2.p_2 with time limit 89
% -prover status CounterSatisfiable
% --creating new selector for [CSR002+1.ax]
% -running prover on /tmp/tmpow6b-s/sel_CSR038+2.p_3 with time limit 119
% -prover status CounterSatisfiable
% --creating new selector for [CSR002+1.ax]
% -running prover on /tmp/tmpow6b-s/sel_CSR038+2.p_4 with time limit 149
% -prover status Theorem
% Problem CSR038+2.p solved in phase 3.
% % SZS status Theorem for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/CSR/CSR038+2.p
% % SZS status Ended for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/CSR/CSR038+2.p
% Solved 1 out of 1.
% # Problem is unsatisfiable (or provable), constructing proof object
% # SZS status Theorem
% # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% See solution above
% # SZS output end CNFRefutation
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------