TSTP Solution File: CSR038+2 by Enigma---0.5.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : CSR038+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 02:46:49 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 5.08s 2.77s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 5.08s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   15 (   7 unt;   0 nHn;  15 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   25 (   0 equ;  14 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   6 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   14 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_1065,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ tptpcol_16_7738(X1)
    | ~ tptp_8_968(X1,c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationtotypefnissuingaprescriptionproductscorrectivelensprescription_2804) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-m_57w79g/lgb.p',i_0_1065) ).

cnf(i_0_280,plain,
    ( tptp_8_968(f_relationexistsallfn(X1,c_tptp_8_968,c_tptpcol_16_7738,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription)),X1)
    | ~ isa(X1,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-m_57w79g/lgb.p',i_0_280) ).

cnf(i_0_162,plain,
    isa(c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationtotypefnissuingaprescriptionproductscorrectivelensprescription_2804,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-m_57w79g/lgb.p',i_0_162) ).

cnf(i_0_713,plain,
    ( tptpcol_16_7738(X1)
    | ~ isa(X1,c_tptpcol_16_7738) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-m_57w79g/lgb.p',i_0_713) ).

cnf(i_0_691,plain,
    ( isa(f_relationexistsallfn(X1,X2,X3,X4),X3)
    | ~ isa(X1,X4)
    | ~ relationexistsall(X2,X3,X4) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-m_57w79g/lgb.p',i_0_691) ).

cnf(i_0_281,plain,
    relationexistsall(c_tptp_8_968,c_tptpcol_16_7738,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-m_57w79g/lgb.p',i_0_281) ).

cnf(c_0_1072,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ tptpcol_16_7738(X1)
    | ~ tptp_8_968(X1,c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationtotypefnissuingaprescriptionproductscorrectivelensprescription_2804) ),
    i_0_1065 ).

cnf(c_0_1073,plain,
    ( tptp_8_968(f_relationexistsallfn(X1,c_tptp_8_968,c_tptpcol_16_7738,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription)),X1)
    | ~ isa(X1,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription)) ),
    i_0_280 ).

cnf(c_0_1074,plain,
    isa(c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationtotypefnissuingaprescriptionproductscorrectivelensprescription_2804,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription)),
    i_0_162 ).

cnf(c_0_1075,negated_conjecture,
    ~ tptpcol_16_7738(f_relationexistsallfn(c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationtotypefnissuingaprescriptionproductscorrectivelensprescription_2804,c_tptp_8_968,c_tptpcol_16_7738,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription))),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_1072,c_0_1073]),c_0_1074])]) ).

cnf(c_0_1076,plain,
    ( tptpcol_16_7738(X1)
    | ~ isa(X1,c_tptpcol_16_7738) ),
    i_0_713 ).

cnf(c_0_1077,plain,
    ~ isa(f_relationexistsallfn(c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationtotypefnissuingaprescriptionproductscorrectivelensprescription_2804,c_tptp_8_968,c_tptpcol_16_7738,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription)),c_tptpcol_16_7738),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_1075,c_0_1076]) ).

cnf(c_0_1078,plain,
    ( isa(f_relationexistsallfn(X1,X2,X3,X4),X3)
    | ~ isa(X1,X4)
    | ~ relationexistsall(X2,X3,X4) ),
    i_0_691 ).

cnf(c_0_1079,plain,
    relationexistsall(c_tptp_8_968,c_tptpcol_16_7738,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription)),
    i_0_281 ).

cnf(c_0_1080,plain,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_1077,c_0_1078]),c_0_1079]),c_0_1074])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.02/0.11  % Problem  : CSR038+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.02/0.12  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.11/0.32  % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.32  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.32  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.11/0.32  % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 05:31:42 EDT 2022
% 0.11/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.43  # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.19/0.46  # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.46  # Filter: axfilter_auto   0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   0.p
% 0.19/0.46  # Filter: axfilter_auto   1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   1.p
% 0.19/0.46  # Filter: axfilter_auto   2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   2.p
% 5.08/2.77  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 5.08/2.77  # No SInE strategy applied
% 5.08/2.77  # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 5.08/2.77  # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 5.08/2.77  # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 5.08/2.77  #
% 5.08/2.77  # Preprocessing time       : 0.026 s
% 5.08/2.77  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 5.08/2.77  
% 5.08/2.77  # Proof found!
% 5.08/2.77  # SZS status Theorem
% 5.08/2.77  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 5.08/2.77  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 5.08/2.77  
% 5.08/2.77  # -------------------------------------------------
% 5.08/2.77  # User time                : 0.042 s
% 5.08/2.77  # System time              : 0.008 s
% 5.08/2.77  # Total time               : 0.051 s
% 5.08/2.77  # Maximum resident set size: 7128 pages
% 5.08/2.77  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------