TSTP Solution File: CSR037+5 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : CSR037+5 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 02:46:48 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 19.21s 12.10s
% Output : CNFRefutation 19.21s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 14 ( 7 unt; 0 nHn; 14 RR)
% Number of literals : 23 ( 0 equ; 11 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 4 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 7 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_569,plain,
( geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x15_y24,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-e5wrhxpo/input.p',i_0_569) ).
cnf(i_0_2747,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-e5wrhxpo/input.p',i_0_2747) ).
cnf(i_0_2199,plain,
( geographicalsubregions(X1,X2)
| ~ geographicalsubregions(X3,X2)
| ~ geographicalsubregions(X1,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-e5wrhxpo/input.p',i_0_2199) ).
cnf(i_0_1202,plain,
( geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l3_x15_y24)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-e5wrhxpo/input.p',i_0_1202) ).
cnf(i_0_2746,negated_conjecture,
~ geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-e5wrhxpo/input.p',i_0_2746) ).
cnf(c_0_2753,plain,
( geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x15_y24,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt) ),
i_0_569 ).
cnf(c_0_2754,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt),
i_0_2747 ).
cnf(c_0_2755,plain,
( geographicalsubregions(X1,X2)
| ~ geographicalsubregions(X3,X2)
| ~ geographicalsubregions(X1,X3) ),
i_0_2199 ).
cnf(c_0_2756,plain,
geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x15_y24,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_2753,c_0_2754])]) ).
cnf(c_0_2757,plain,
( geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l3_x15_y24)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt) ),
i_0_1202 ).
cnf(c_0_2758,negated_conjecture,
~ geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72),
i_0_2746 ).
cnf(c_0_2759,plain,
( geographicalsubregions(X1,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72)
| ~ geographicalsubregions(X1,c_georegion_l3_x15_y24) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2755,c_0_2756]) ).
cnf(c_0_2760,plain,
geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l3_x15_y24),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_2757,c_0_2754])]) ).
cnf(c_0_2761,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2758,c_0_2759]),c_0_2760])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : CSR037+5 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.5.0.
% 0.12/0.13 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 02:45:38 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.45 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 8.80/9.06 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 8.80/9.06 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 8.80/9.06 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 8.80/9.06 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 19.21/12.10 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_S0Y:
% 19.21/12.10 # Version: 2.1pre011
% 19.21/12.10 # Preprocessing time : 0.050 s
% 19.21/12.10
% 19.21/12.10 # Proof found!
% 19.21/12.10 # SZS status Theorem
% 19.21/12.10 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 19.21/12.10 # Proof object total steps : 14
% 19.21/12.10 # Proof object clause steps : 9
% 19.21/12.10 # Proof object formula steps : 5
% 19.21/12.10 # Proof object conjectures : 5
% 19.21/12.10 # Proof object clause conjectures : 3
% 19.21/12.10 # Proof object formula conjectures : 2
% 19.21/12.10 # Proof object initial clauses used : 5
% 19.21/12.10 # Proof object initial formulas used : 5
% 19.21/12.10 # Proof object generating inferences : 2
% 19.21/12.10 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 6
% 19.21/12.10 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 19.21/12.10 # Parsed axioms : 2745
% 19.21/12.10 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 19.21/12.10 # Initial clauses : 2745
% 19.21/12.10 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 19.21/12.10 # Initial clauses in saturation : 2745
% 19.21/12.10 # Processed clauses : 2785
% 19.21/12.10 # ...of these trivial : 253
% 19.21/12.10 # ...subsumed : 64
% 19.21/12.10 # ...remaining for further processing : 2468
% 19.21/12.10 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 5
% 19.21/12.10 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 19.21/12.10 # Backward-subsumed : 5
% 19.21/12.10 # Backward-rewritten : 57
% 19.21/12.10 # Generated clauses : 7143
% 19.21/12.10 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 6612
% 19.21/12.10 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 10
% 19.21/12.10 # Paramodulations : 7138
% 19.21/12.10 # Factorizations : 0
% 19.21/12.10 # Equation resolutions : 5
% 19.21/12.10 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 19.21/12.10 # Propositional unsat check successes : 0
% 19.21/12.10 # Current number of processed clauses : 2401
% 19.21/12.10 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 1422
% 19.21/12.10 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 19.21/12.10 # Negative unit clauses : 22
% 19.21/12.10 # Non-unit-clauses : 957
% 19.21/12.10 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 6258
% 19.21/12.10 # ...number of literals in the above : 11792
% 19.21/12.10 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 19.21/12.10 # Current number of archived clauses : 62
% 19.21/12.10 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 117204
% 19.21/12.10 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 106244
% 19.21/12.10 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 76
% 19.21/12.10 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 13930
% 19.21/12.10 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 19.21/12.10 # BW rewrite match attempts : 1660
% 19.21/12.10 # BW rewrite match successes : 37
% 19.21/12.10 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 19.21/12.10 # Condensation successes : 0
% 19.21/12.10 # Termbank termtop insertions : 105729
% 19.21/12.10
% 19.21/12.10 # -------------------------------------------------
% 19.21/12.10 # User time : 0.172 s
% 19.21/12.10 # System time : 0.017 s
% 19.21/12.10 # Total time : 0.189 s
% 19.21/12.10 # ...preprocessing : 0.050 s
% 19.21/12.10 # ...main loop : 0.139 s
% 19.21/12.10 # Maximum resident set size: 24820 pages
% 19.21/12.10
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------