%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : CSR037+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 23:24:28 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 198.56s 198.76s
% Output   : Refutation 198.56s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : CSR037+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.00/0.12  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Fri Jun 10 14:58:55 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 198.56/198.76  
% 198.56/198.76  SPASS V 3.9 
% 198.56/198.76  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 198.56/198.76  % SZS status Theorem
% 198.56/198.76  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 198.56/198.76  SPASS derived 27460 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 31839 clauses.
% 198.56/198.76  SPASS allocated 122736 KBytes.
% 198.56/198.76  SPASS spent	0:3:12.81 on the problem.
% 198.56/198.76  		0:00:00.11 for the input.
% 198.56/198.76  		0:00:06.95 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 198.56/198.76  		0:00:05.31 for inferences.
% 198.56/198.76  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 198.56/198.76  		0:2:28.45 for the reduction.
% 198.56/198.76  
% 198.56/198.76  
% 198.56/198.76  Here is a proof with depth 1, length 9 :
% 198.56/198.76  % SZS output start Refutation
% 198.56/198.76  1[0:Inp] ||  -> mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)*.
% 198.56/198.76  2296[0:Inp] || geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72)*l -> .
% 198.56/198.76  3828[0:Inp] || mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)* -> geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l3_x15_y24).
% 198.56/198.76  3962[0:Inp] || mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)* -> geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x15_y24,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72).
% 198.56/198.76  7914[0:Inp] || geographicalsubregions(u,v)* geographicalsubregions(v,w)* -> geographicalsubregions(u,w)*.
% 198.56/198.76  8016[0:MRR:3962.0,1.0] ||  -> geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x15_y24,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72)*r.
% 198.56/198.76  8024[0:MRR:3828.0,1.0] ||  -> geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l3_x15_y24)*l.
% 198.56/198.76  38582[0:NCh:7914.2,7914.0,2296.0,8024.0] || geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x15_y24,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72)*r -> .
% 198.56/198.76  38587[0:MRR:38582.0,8016.0] ||  -> .
% 198.56/198.76  % SZS output end Refutation
% 198.56/198.76  Formulae used in the proof : query137 ax2_915 ax2_3176 ax2_7881
% 198.56/198.76  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------