TSTP Solution File: CSR037+3 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : CSR037+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 03:01:38 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.84s 2.02s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.84s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 18 ( 5 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 34 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 28 ( 12 ~; 9 |; 2 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 5 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 4 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 10 ( 0 sgn 6 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query137,conjecture,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
=> geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',query137) ).
fof(ax2_1656,axiom,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
=> geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x15_y24,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_1656) ).
fof(ax2_7881,axiom,
! [X15,X16,X17] :
( ( geographicalsubregions(X15,X16)
& geographicalsubregions(X16,X17) )
=> geographicalsubregions(X15,X17) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_7881) ).
fof(ax2_902,axiom,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
=> geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l3_x15_y24) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_902) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
~ ( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
=> geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query137]) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
| geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x15_y24,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax2_1656]) ).
fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
& ~ geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
fof(c_0_7,plain,
! [X18,X19,X20] :
( ~ geographicalsubregions(X18,X19)
| ~ geographicalsubregions(X19,X20)
| geographicalsubregions(X18,X20) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax2_7881])]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x15_y24,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
fof(c_0_10,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
| geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l3_x15_y24) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax2_902]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( geographicalsubregions(X1,X2)
| ~ geographicalsubregions(X3,X2)
| ~ geographicalsubregions(X1,X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x15_y24,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9])]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l3_x15_y24)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( geographicalsubregions(X1,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72)
| ~ geographicalsubregions(X1,c_georegion_l3_x15_y24) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l3_x15_y24),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_9])]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
~ geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),c_0_16]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11 % Problem : CSR037+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.00/0.12 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Fri Jun 10 15:02:37 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.84/2.02 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.84/2.02 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.84/2.02 # Preprocessing time : 0.148 s
% 0.84/2.02
% 0.84/2.02 # Proof found!
% 0.84/2.02 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.84/2.02 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.84/2.02 # Proof object total steps : 18
% 0.84/2.02 # Proof object clause steps : 9
% 0.84/2.02 # Proof object formula steps : 9
% 0.84/2.02 # Proof object conjectures : 5
% 0.84/2.02 # Proof object clause conjectures : 2
% 0.84/2.02 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.84/2.02 # Proof object initial clauses used : 5
% 0.84/2.02 # Proof object initial formulas used : 4
% 0.84/2.02 # Proof object generating inferences : 2
% 0.84/2.02 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 5
% 0.84/2.02 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.84/2.02 # Parsed axioms : 8006
% 0.84/2.02 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 7986
% 0.84/2.02 # Initial clauses : 21
% 0.84/2.02 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.84/2.02 # Initial clauses in saturation : 21
% 0.84/2.02 # Processed clauses : 23
% 0.84/2.02 # ...of these trivial : 2
% 0.84/2.02 # ...subsumed : 1
% 0.84/2.02 # ...remaining for further processing : 20
% 0.84/2.02 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.84/2.02 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.84/2.02 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.84/2.02 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.84/2.02 # Generated clauses : 14
% 0.84/2.02 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 10
% 0.84/2.02 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.84/2.02 # Paramodulations : 14
% 0.84/2.02 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.84/2.02 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.84/2.02 # Current number of processed clauses : 20
% 0.84/2.02 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 8
% 0.84/2.02 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.84/2.02 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.84/2.02 # Non-unit-clauses : 11
% 0.84/2.02 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 8
% 0.84/2.02 # ...number of literals in the above : 11
% 0.84/2.02 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.84/2.02 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.84/2.02 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 8
% 0.84/2.02 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 7
% 0.84/2.02 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 1
% 0.84/2.02 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.84/2.02 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.84/2.02 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.84/2.02 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.84/2.02 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.84/2.02 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.84/2.02 # Termbank termtop insertions : 51749
% 0.84/2.02
% 0.84/2.02 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.84/2.02 # User time : 0.136 s
% 0.84/2.02 # System time : 0.013 s
% 0.84/2.02 # Total time : 0.149 s
% 0.84/2.02 # Maximum resident set size: 19668 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------