TSTP Solution File: CSR037+1 by SRASS---0.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SRASS---0.1
% Problem : CSR037+1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp
% Command : SRASS -q2 -a 0 10 10 10 -i3 -n60 %s
% Computer : art05.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Dec 28 23:06:44 EST 2010
% Result : Theorem 1.02s
% Output : Solution 1.02s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ERROR: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Reading problem from /tmp/SystemOnTPTP18342/CSR037+1.tptp
% Adding relevance values
% Extracting the conjecture
% Sorting axioms by relevance
% Looking for THM ...
% found
% SZS status THM for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP18342/CSR037+1.tptp
% SZS output start Solution for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP18342/CSR037+1.tptp
% TreeLimitedRun: ----------------------------------------------------------
% TreeLimitedRun: /home/graph/tptp/Systems/EP---1.2/eproof --print-statistics -xAuto -tAuto --cpu-limit=60 --proof-time-unlimited --memory-limit=Auto --tstp-in --tstp-out /tmp/SRASS.s.p
% TreeLimitedRun: CPU time limit is 60s
% TreeLimitedRun: WC time limit is 120s
% TreeLimitedRun: PID is 18438
% TreeLimitedRun: ----------------------------------------------------------
% PrfWatch: 0.00 CPU 0.01 WC
% # Preprocessing time : 0.017 s
% # Problem is unsatisfiable (or provable), constructing proof object
% # SZS status Theorem
% # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% fof(1, axiom,![X1]:![X2]:![X3]:((geographicalsubregions(X1,X2)&geographicalsubregions(X2,X3))=>geographicalsubregions(X1,X3)),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', just34)).
% fof(2, axiom,(mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)=>geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l3_x15_y24)),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', just12)).
% fof(3, axiom,(mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)=>geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x15_y24,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72)),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', just13)).
% fof(66, conjecture,(mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)=>geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72)),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', query37)).
% fof(67, negated_conjecture,~((mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)=>geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72))),inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[66])).
% fof(68, plain,![X1]:![X2]:![X3]:((~(geographicalsubregions(X1,X2))|~(geographicalsubregions(X2,X3)))|geographicalsubregions(X1,X3)),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[1])).
% fof(69, plain,![X4]:![X5]:![X6]:((~(geographicalsubregions(X4,X5))|~(geographicalsubregions(X5,X6)))|geographicalsubregions(X4,X6)),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[68])).
% cnf(70,plain,(geographicalsubregions(X1,X2)|~geographicalsubregions(X3,X2)|~geographicalsubregions(X1,X3)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[69])).
% fof(71, plain,(~(mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt))|geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l3_x15_y24)),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[2])).
% cnf(72,plain,(geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l3_x15_y24)|~mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[71])).
% fof(73, plain,(~(mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt))|geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x15_y24,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72)),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[3])).
% cnf(74,plain,(geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x15_y24,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72)|~mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[73])).
% fof(239, negated_conjecture,(mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)&~(geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[67])).
% cnf(240,negated_conjecture,(~geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[239])).
% cnf(241,negated_conjecture,(mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[239])).
% cnf(242,plain,(geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l3_x15_y24)|$false),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[72,241,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(243,plain,(geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l3_x15_y24)),inference(cn,[status(thm)],[242,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(244,plain,(geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x15_y24,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72)|$false),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[74,241,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(245,plain,(geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x15_y24,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72)),inference(cn,[status(thm)],[244,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(283,plain,(geographicalsubregions(X1,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72)|~geographicalsubregions(X1,c_georegion_l3_x15_y24)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[70,245,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(433,negated_conjecture,(~geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l3_x15_y24)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[240,283,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(437,negated_conjecture,($false),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[433,243,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(438,negated_conjecture,($false),inference(cn,[status(thm)],[437,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(439,negated_conjecture,($false),438,['proof']).
% # SZS output end CNFRefutation
% # Processed clauses : 112
% # ...of these trivial : 6
% # ...subsumed : 13
% # ...remaining for further processing: 93
% # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% # Backward-subsumed : 0
% # Backward-rewritten : 1
% # Generated clauses : 127
% # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 62
% # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% # Paramodulations : 127
% # Factorizations : 0
% # Equation resolutions : 0
% # Current number of processed clauses: 92
% # Positive orientable unit clauses: 48
% # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% # Negative unit clauses : 1
% # Non-unit-clauses : 43
% # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 17
% # ...number of literals in the above : 34
% # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 34
% # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 34
% # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 18
% # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% # Indexed BW rewrite attempts : 1
% # Indexed BW rewrite successes : 1
% # Backwards rewriting index: 86 leaves, 1.33+/-1.072 terms/leaf
% # Paramod-from index: 52 leaves, 1.00+/-0.000 terms/leaf
% # Paramod-into index: 78 leaves, 1.19+/-0.680 terms/leaf
% # -------------------------------------------------
% # User time : 0.017 s
% # System time : 0.006 s
% # Total time : 0.023 s
% # Maximum resident set size: 0 pages
% PrfWatch: 0.11 CPU 0.18 WC
% FINAL PrfWatch: 0.11 CPU 0.18 WC
% SZS output end Solution for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP18342/CSR037+1.tptp
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------