TSTP Solution File: CSR037+1 by CSE_E---1.5
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE_E---1.5
% Problem : CSR037+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 30 19:19:24 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 0.18s 0.57s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.18s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 35
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 49 ( 5 unt; 31 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 34 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 28 ( 12 ~; 9 |; 2 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 5 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 24 ( 17 >; 7 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 18 ( 17 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 14 ( 14 usr; 14 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 10 ( 0 sgn; 6 !; 0 ?; 0 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(decl_22,type,
c_geographymt: $i ).
tff(decl_23,type,
c_basekb: $i ).
tff(decl_24,type,
genlmt: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(decl_25,type,
c_worldgeographymt: $i ).
tff(decl_26,type,
c_orderingpredicate: $i ).
tff(decl_27,type,
c_transitivebinarypredicate: $i ).
tff(decl_28,type,
genls: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(decl_29,type,
orderingpredicate: $i > $o ).
tff(decl_30,type,
transitivebinarypredicate: $i > $o ).
tff(decl_31,type,
c_physicalorderingpredicate: $i ).
tff(decl_32,type,
physicalorderingpredicate: $i > $o ).
tff(decl_33,type,
c_genlmt: $i ).
tff(decl_34,type,
c_universalvocabularymt: $i ).
tff(decl_35,type,
c_geographicalsubregions: $i ).
tff(decl_36,type,
c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt: $i ).
tff(decl_37,type,
c_tptpgeo_member7_mt: $i ).
tff(decl_38,type,
mtvisible: $i > $o ).
tff(decl_39,type,
c_georegion_l2_x5_y8: $i ).
tff(decl_40,type,
c_georegion_l3_x15_y24: $i ).
tff(decl_41,type,
geographicalsubregions: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(decl_42,type,
c_georegion_l4_x45_y72: $i ).
tff(decl_43,type,
isa: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(decl_44,type,
disjointwith: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(decl_45,type,
genlinverse: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(decl_46,type,
genlpreds: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(decl_47,type,
predicate: $i > $o ).
tff(decl_48,type,
binarypredicate: $i > $o ).
tff(decl_49,type,
collection: $i > $o ).
tff(decl_50,type,
geographicalregion: $i > $o ).
tff(decl_51,type,
thing: $i > $o ).
tff(decl_52,type,
microtheory: $i > $o ).
fof(query37,conjecture,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
=> geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query37) ).
fof(just13,axiom,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
=> geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x15_y24,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',just13) ).
fof(just34,axiom,
! [X10,X11,X12] :
( ( geographicalsubregions(X10,X11)
& geographicalsubregions(X11,X12) )
=> geographicalsubregions(X10,X12) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',just34) ).
fof(just12,axiom,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
=> geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l3_x15_y24) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',just12) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
~ ( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
=> geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query37]) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
| geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x15_y24,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[just13]) ).
fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
& ~ geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
fof(c_0_7,plain,
! [X64,X65,X66] :
( ~ geographicalsubregions(X64,X65)
| ~ geographicalsubregions(X65,X66)
| geographicalsubregions(X64,X66) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[just34])]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x15_y24,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
fof(c_0_10,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
| geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l3_x15_y24) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[just12]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( geographicalsubregions(X1,X3)
| ~ geographicalsubregions(X1,X2)
| ~ geographicalsubregions(X2,X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x15_y24,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9])]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l3_x15_y24)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
~ geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( geographicalsubregions(X1,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72)
| ~ geographicalsubregions(X1,c_georegion_l3_x15_y24) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l3_x15_y24),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_9])]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),c_0_16])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : CSR037+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.00/0.13 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % DateTime : Mon Aug 28 11:37:22 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.55 start to proof: theBenchmark
% 0.18/0.57 % Version : CSE_E---1.5
% 0.18/0.57 % Problem : theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.57 % Proof found
% 0.18/0.57 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.57 % SZS output start Proof
% See solution above
% 0.18/0.57 % Total time : 0.010000 s
% 0.18/0.57 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.18/0.57 % Total time : 0.013000 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------