TSTP Solution File: CSR035+2 by E-SAT---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem : CSR035+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat May 4 07:35:14 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.38s 0.56s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.38s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 9 ( 3 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 15 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 11 ( 5 ~; 2 |; 1 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 3 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 4 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 5 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 4 ( 1 sgn 1 !; 2 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query85,conjecture,
? [X13] :
( mtvisible(c_englishmt)
=> prettystring(f_instancewithrelationtofn(c_footballteam,c_affiliatedwith,c_beloitcollege),X13) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.rrzuJyHttC/E---3.1_11695.p',query85) ).
fof(ax1_452,axiom,
( mtvisible(c_englishmt)
=> prettystring(f_instancewithrelationtofn(c_footballteam,c_affiliatedwith,c_beloitcollege),s_thefootballteamwhohasbeenaffiliatedwithbeloitcollege) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.rrzuJyHttC/E---3.1_11695.p',ax1_452) ).
fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X13] :
( mtvisible(c_englishmt)
=> prettystring(f_instancewithrelationtofn(c_footballteam,c_affiliatedwith,c_beloitcollege),X13) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query85]) ).
fof(c_0_3,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_englishmt)
| prettystring(f_instancewithrelationtofn(c_footballteam,c_affiliatedwith,c_beloitcollege),s_thefootballteamwhohasbeenaffiliatedwithbeloitcollege) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax1_452])]) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
! [X22] :
( mtvisible(c_englishmt)
& ~ prettystring(f_instancewithrelationtofn(c_footballteam,c_affiliatedwith,c_beloitcollege),X22) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,plain,
( prettystring(f_instancewithrelationtofn(c_footballteam,c_affiliatedwith,c_beloitcollege),s_thefootballteamwhohasbeenaffiliatedwithbeloitcollege)
| ~ mtvisible(c_englishmt) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_englishmt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
~ prettystring(f_instancewithrelationtofn(c_footballteam,c_affiliatedwith,c_beloitcollege),X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6])]),c_0_7]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.11 % Problem : CSR035+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.06/0.12 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Fri May 3 15:21:08 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.37/0.52 Running first-order model finding
% 0.37/0.52 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.rrzuJyHttC/E---3.1_11695.p
% 0.38/0.56 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.38/0.56 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.38/0.56 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.38/0.56 # Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 900s (3) cores
% 0.38/0.56 # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.38/0.56 # Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.38/0.56 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.38/0.56 # sh5l with pid 11775 completed with status 0
% 0.38/0.56 # Result found by sh5l
% 0.38/0.56 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.38/0.56 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.38/0.56 # Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 900s (3) cores
% 0.38/0.56 # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.38/0.56 # Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.38/0.56 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.38/0.56 # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.38/0.56 # Search class: FHHNM-FSLM31-SFFFFFNN
% 0.38/0.56 # partial match(2): FHHNM-SSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.38/0.56 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.38/0.56 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d with 181s (1) cores
% 0.38/0.56 # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d with pid 11780 completed with status 0
% 0.38/0.56 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d
% 0.38/0.56 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.38/0.56 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.38/0.56 # Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 900s (3) cores
% 0.38/0.56 # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.38/0.56 # Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.38/0.56 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.38/0.56 # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.38/0.56 # Search class: FHHNM-FSLM31-SFFFFFNN
% 0.38/0.56 # partial match(2): FHHNM-SSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.38/0.56 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.38/0.56 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d with 181s (1) cores
% 0.38/0.56 # Preprocessing time : 0.005 s
% 0.38/0.56 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.38/0.56
% 0.38/0.56 # Proof found!
% 0.38/0.56 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.38/0.56 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.38/0.56 # Parsed axioms : 1132
% 0.38/0.56 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 854
% 0.38/0.56 # Initial clauses : 279
% 0.38/0.56 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.38/0.56 # Initial clauses in saturation : 279
% 0.38/0.56 # Processed clauses : 3
% 0.38/0.56 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.38/0.56 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.38/0.56 # ...remaining for further processing : 2
% 0.38/0.56 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.38/0.56 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.38/0.56 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.38/0.56 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.38/0.56 # Generated clauses : 0
% 0.38/0.56 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.38/0.56 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.38/0.56 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.38/0.56 # Paramodulations : 0
% 0.38/0.56 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.38/0.56 # NegExts : 0
% 0.38/0.56 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.38/0.56 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.38/0.56 # Total rewrite steps : 1
% 0.38/0.56 # ...of those cached : 0
% 0.38/0.56 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.38/0.56 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.38/0.56 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.38/0.56 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.38/0.56 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.38/0.56 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.38/0.56 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.38/0.56 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.38/0.56 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.38/0.56 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.38/0.56 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.38/0.56 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.38/0.56 # Current number of processed clauses : 2
% 0.38/0.56 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 1
% 0.38/0.56 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.38/0.56 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.38/0.56 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.38/0.56 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 276
% 0.38/0.56 # ...number of literals in the above : 474
% 0.38/0.56 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.38/0.56 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.38/0.56 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.38/0.56 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.38/0.56 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.38/0.56 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.38/0.56 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.38/0.56 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.38/0.56 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.38/0.56 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.38/0.56 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.38/0.56 # Termbank termtop insertions : 17909
% 0.38/0.56 # Search garbage collected termcells : 5201
% 0.38/0.56
% 0.38/0.56 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.38/0.56 # User time : 0.014 s
% 0.38/0.56 # System time : 0.005 s
% 0.38/0.56 # Total time : 0.019 s
% 0.38/0.56 # Maximum resident set size: 4668 pages
% 0.38/0.56
% 0.38/0.56 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.38/0.56 # User time : 0.028 s
% 0.38/0.56 # System time : 0.010 s
% 0.38/0.56 # Total time : 0.038 s
% 0.38/0.56 # Maximum resident set size: 2660 pages
% 0.38/0.56 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------