TSTP Solution File: CSR035+1 by Vampire---4.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire---4.8
% Problem  : CSR035+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s

% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon May 20 19:32:28 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.64s 0.84s
% Output   : Refutation 0.64s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   11 (   4 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   18 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   14 (   7   ~;   2   |;   1   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    4 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   5 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    5 (   2   !;   3   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f92,plain,
    $false,
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f91,f83]) ).

fof(f83,plain,
    mtvisible(c_englishmt),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f77]) ).

fof(f77,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ prettystring(f_instancewithrelationtofn(c_footballteam,c_affiliatedwith,c_beloitcollege),X0)
      & mtvisible(c_englishmt) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f41]) ).

fof(f41,plain,
    ~ ? [X0] :
        ( mtvisible(c_englishmt)
       => prettystring(f_instancewithrelationtofn(c_footballteam,c_affiliatedwith,c_beloitcollege),X0) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f40]) ).

fof(f40,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ? [X9] :
        ( mtvisible(c_englishmt)
       => prettystring(f_instancewithrelationtofn(c_footballteam,c_affiliatedwith,c_beloitcollege),X9) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f39]) ).

fof(f39,conjecture,
    ? [X9] :
      ( mtvisible(c_englishmt)
     => prettystring(f_instancewithrelationtofn(c_footballteam,c_affiliatedwith,c_beloitcollege),X9) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query35) ).

fof(f91,plain,
    ~ mtvisible(c_englishmt),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f85,f84]) ).

fof(f84,plain,
    ! [X0] : ~ prettystring(f_instancewithrelationtofn(c_footballteam,c_affiliatedwith,c_beloitcollege),X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f77]) ).

fof(f85,plain,
    ( prettystring(f_instancewithrelationtofn(c_footballteam,c_affiliatedwith,c_beloitcollege),s_thefootballteamwhohasbeenaffiliatedwithbeloitcollege)
    | ~ mtvisible(c_englishmt) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f78]) ).

fof(f78,plain,
    ( prettystring(f_instancewithrelationtofn(c_footballteam,c_affiliatedwith,c_beloitcollege),s_thefootballteamwhohasbeenaffiliatedwithbeloitcollege)
    | ~ mtvisible(c_englishmt) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f1]) ).

fof(f1,axiom,
    ( mtvisible(c_englishmt)
   => prettystring(f_instancewithrelationtofn(c_footballteam,c_affiliatedwith,c_beloitcollege),s_thefootballteamwhohasbeenaffiliatedwithbeloitcollege) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',just1) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11  % Problem    : CSR035+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.12/0.12  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime   : Sun May 19 01:30:08 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.12/0.33  This is a FOF_THM_RFO_NEQ problem
% 0.12/0.33  Running vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.64/0.83  % (6803)ott+1011_1:1_sil=2000:urr=on:i=33:sd=1:kws=inv_frequency:ss=axioms:sup=off_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/33Mi)
% 0.64/0.83  % (6802)lrs+1011_1:1_sil=8000:sp=occurrence:nwc=10.0:i=78:ss=axioms:sgt=8_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/78Mi)
% 0.64/0.83  % (6804)lrs+2_1:1_sil=16000:fde=none:sos=all:nwc=5.0:i=34:ep=RS:s2pl=on:lma=on:afp=100000_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/34Mi)
% 0.64/0.83  % (6800)dis-1011_2:1_sil=2000:lsd=20:nwc=5.0:flr=on:mep=off:st=3.0:i=34:sd=1:ep=RS:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/34Mi)
% 0.64/0.83  % (6805)lrs+1002_1:16_to=lpo:sil=32000:sp=unary_frequency:sos=on:i=45:bd=off:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/45Mi)
% 0.64/0.83  % (6801)lrs+1011_461:32768_sil=16000:irw=on:sp=frequency:lsd=20:fd=preordered:nwc=10.0:s2agt=32:alpa=false:cond=fast:s2a=on:i=51:s2at=3.0:awrs=decay:awrsf=691:bd=off:nm=20:fsr=off:amm=sco:uhcvi=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/51Mi)
% 0.64/0.83  % (6806)lrs+21_1:5_sil=2000:sos=on:urr=on:newcnf=on:slsq=on:i=83:slsql=off:bd=off:nm=2:ss=axioms:st=1.5:sp=const_min:gsp=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/83Mi)
% 0.64/0.83  % (6807)lrs-21_1:1_to=lpo:sil=2000:sp=frequency:sos=on:lma=on:i=56:sd=2:ss=axioms:ep=R_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/56Mi)
% 0.64/0.83  % (6803)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (6803)------------------------------
% 0.64/0.83  % (6803)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.64/0.83  % (6805)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (6805)------------------------------
% 0.64/0.83  % (6805)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.64/0.83  % (6805)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.64/0.83  
% 0.64/0.83  % (6805)Memory used [KB]: 952
% 0.64/0.83  % (6805)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.64/0.83  % (6805)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.64/0.83  % (6803)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.64/0.83  
% 0.64/0.83  % (6803)Memory used [KB]: 951
% 0.64/0.83  % (6803)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.64/0.83  % (6803)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.64/0.83  % (6805)------------------------------
% 0.64/0.83  % (6805)------------------------------
% 0.64/0.83  % (6803)------------------------------
% 0.64/0.83  % (6803)------------------------------
% 0.64/0.83  % (6807)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (6807)------------------------------
% 0.64/0.83  % (6807)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.64/0.83  % (6807)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.64/0.83  
% 0.64/0.83  % (6807)Memory used [KB]: 952
% 0.64/0.83  % (6807)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.64/0.83  % (6807)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.64/0.84  % (6804)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.64/0.84  % (6800)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.64/0.84  % (6802)First to succeed.
% 0.64/0.84  % (6806)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (6806)------------------------------
% 0.64/0.84  % (6806)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.64/0.84  % (6806)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.64/0.84  
% 0.64/0.84  % (6806)Memory used [KB]: 954
% 0.64/0.84  % (6806)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.64/0.84  % (6806)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.64/0.84  % (6807)------------------------------
% 0.64/0.84  % (6807)------------------------------
% 0.64/0.84  % (6806)------------------------------
% 0.64/0.84  % (6806)------------------------------
% 0.64/0.84  % (6801)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.64/0.84  % (6802)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-6799"
% 0.64/0.84  % (6802)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.64/0.84  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.64/0.84  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.64/0.84  % (6802)------------------------------
% 0.64/0.84  % (6802)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.64/0.84  % (6802)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.64/0.84  
% 0.64/0.84  % (6802)Memory used [KB]: 965
% 0.64/0.84  % (6802)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.64/0.84  % (6802)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.64/0.84  % (6799)Success in time 0.5 s
% 0.64/0.84  % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------