TSTP Solution File: CSR034+6 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : CSR034+6 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v5.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 02:46:45 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 74.53s 69.55s
% Output : CNFRefutation 74.53s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 2
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 7 ( 5 unt; 0 nHn; 7 RR)
% Number of literals : 9 ( 0 equ; 4 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 2 ( 2 usr; 2 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 4 ( 2 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_2797,plain,
( isa(X1,c_individual)
| ~ individual(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-b3ubdng2/input.p',i_0_2797) ).
cnf(i_0_689,plain,
individual(c_wanica_districtsuriname),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-b3ubdng2/input.p',i_0_689) ).
cnf(i_0_3778,negated_conjecture,
~ isa(c_wanica_districtsuriname,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-b3ubdng2/input.p',i_0_3778) ).
cnf(c_0_3782,plain,
( isa(X1,c_individual)
| ~ individual(X1) ),
i_0_2797 ).
cnf(c_0_3783,plain,
individual(c_wanica_districtsuriname),
i_0_689 ).
cnf(c_0_3784,negated_conjecture,
~ isa(c_wanica_districtsuriname,X1),
i_0_3778 ).
cnf(c_0_3785,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3782,c_0_3783]),c_0_3784]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : CSR034+6 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v5.3.0.
% 0.07/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 16:42:43 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.44 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 66.41/66.63 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 66.41/66.63 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 66.41/66.63 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 66.41/66.63 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 74.53/69.55 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y:
% 74.53/69.55 # Version: 2.1pre011
% 74.53/69.55 # Preprocessing time : 0.075 s
% 74.53/69.55
% 74.53/69.55 # Proof found!
% 74.53/69.55 # SZS status Theorem
% 74.53/69.55 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 74.53/69.55 # Proof object total steps : 7
% 74.53/69.55 # Proof object clause steps : 4
% 74.53/69.55 # Proof object formula steps : 3
% 74.53/69.55 # Proof object conjectures : 2
% 74.53/69.55 # Proof object clause conjectures : 1
% 74.53/69.55 # Proof object formula conjectures : 1
% 74.53/69.55 # Proof object initial clauses used : 3
% 74.53/69.55 # Proof object initial formulas used : 3
% 74.53/69.55 # Proof object generating inferences : 1
% 74.53/69.55 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 1
% 74.53/69.55 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 74.53/69.55 # Parsed axioms : 3777
% 74.53/69.55 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 74.53/69.55 # Initial clauses : 3777
% 74.53/69.55 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 74.53/69.55 # Initial clauses in saturation : 3777
% 74.53/69.55 # Processed clauses : 193
% 74.53/69.55 # ...of these trivial : 3
% 74.53/69.55 # ...subsumed : 3
% 74.53/69.55 # ...remaining for further processing : 187
% 74.53/69.55 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 74.53/69.55 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 74.53/69.55 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 74.53/69.55 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 74.53/69.55 # Generated clauses : 35
% 74.53/69.55 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 29
% 74.53/69.55 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 74.53/69.55 # Paramodulations : 35
% 74.53/69.55 # Factorizations : 0
% 74.53/69.55 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 74.53/69.55 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 74.53/69.55 # Propositional unsat check successes : 0
% 74.53/69.55 # Current number of processed clauses : 187
% 74.53/69.55 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 121
% 74.53/69.55 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 74.53/69.55 # Negative unit clauses : 8
% 74.53/69.55 # Non-unit-clauses : 58
% 74.53/69.55 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 3610
% 74.53/69.55 # ...number of literals in the above : 5115
% 74.53/69.55 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 74.53/69.55 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 74.53/69.55 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 537
% 74.53/69.55 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 519
% 74.53/69.55 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 3
% 74.53/69.55 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 241
% 74.53/69.55 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 74.53/69.55 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 74.53/69.55 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 74.53/69.55 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 74.53/69.55 # Condensation successes : 0
% 74.53/69.55 # Termbank termtop insertions : 50609
% 74.53/69.55
% 74.53/69.55 # -------------------------------------------------
% 74.53/69.55 # User time : 0.073 s
% 74.53/69.55 # System time : 0.007 s
% 74.53/69.55 # Total time : 0.080 s
% 74.53/69.55 # ...preprocessing : 0.075 s
% 74.53/69.55 # ...main loop : 0.005 s
% 74.53/69.55 # Maximum resident set size: 13472 pages
% 74.53/69.55
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------