TSTP Solution File: CSR034+5 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : CSR034+5 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 02:46:45 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 19.55s 13.41s
% Output : CNFRefutation 19.55s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 2
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 7 ( 5 unt; 0 nHn; 7 RR)
% Number of literals : 9 ( 0 equ; 4 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 2 ( 2 usr; 2 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 4 ( 2 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_2127,plain,
( isa(X1,c_geographicalthing)
| ~ geographicalthing(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-0_sq6fjp/input.p',i_0_2127) ).
cnf(i_0_807,plain,
geographicalthing(c_wanica_districtsuriname),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-0_sq6fjp/input.p',i_0_807) ).
cnf(i_0_2575,negated_conjecture,
~ isa(c_wanica_districtsuriname,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-0_sq6fjp/input.p',i_0_2575) ).
cnf(c_0_2579,plain,
( isa(X1,c_geographicalthing)
| ~ geographicalthing(X1) ),
i_0_2127 ).
cnf(c_0_2580,plain,
geographicalthing(c_wanica_districtsuriname),
i_0_807 ).
cnf(c_0_2581,negated_conjecture,
~ isa(c_wanica_districtsuriname,X1),
i_0_2575 ).
cnf(c_0_2582,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2579,c_0_2580]),c_0_2581]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.14 % Problem : CSR034+5 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.5.0.
% 0.08/0.15 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.14/0.36 % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.36 % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 10:58:24 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.22/0.48 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 10.25/10.47 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 10.25/10.47 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 10.25/10.47 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 10.25/10.47 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 19.55/13.41 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y:
% 19.55/13.41 # Version: 2.1pre011
% 19.55/13.41 # Preprocessing time : 0.067 s
% 19.55/13.41
% 19.55/13.41 # Proof found!
% 19.55/13.41 # SZS status Theorem
% 19.55/13.41 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 19.55/13.41 # Proof object total steps : 7
% 19.55/13.41 # Proof object clause steps : 4
% 19.55/13.41 # Proof object formula steps : 3
% 19.55/13.41 # Proof object conjectures : 2
% 19.55/13.41 # Proof object clause conjectures : 1
% 19.55/13.41 # Proof object formula conjectures : 1
% 19.55/13.41 # Proof object initial clauses used : 3
% 19.55/13.41 # Proof object initial formulas used : 3
% 19.55/13.41 # Proof object generating inferences : 1
% 19.55/13.41 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 1
% 19.55/13.41 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 19.55/13.41 # Parsed axioms : 2574
% 19.55/13.41 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 19.55/13.41 # Initial clauses : 2574
% 19.55/13.41 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 19.55/13.41 # Initial clauses in saturation : 2574
% 19.55/13.41 # Processed clauses : 181
% 19.55/13.41 # ...of these trivial : 1
% 19.55/13.41 # ...subsumed : 9
% 19.55/13.41 # ...remaining for further processing : 171
% 19.55/13.41 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 3
% 19.55/13.41 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 19.55/13.41 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 19.55/13.41 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 19.55/13.41 # Generated clauses : 10
% 19.55/13.41 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 8
% 19.55/13.41 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 19.55/13.41 # Paramodulations : 7
% 19.55/13.41 # Factorizations : 0
% 19.55/13.41 # Equation resolutions : 3
% 19.55/13.41 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 19.55/13.41 # Propositional unsat check successes : 0
% 19.55/13.41 # Current number of processed clauses : 168
% 19.55/13.41 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 87
% 19.55/13.41 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 19.55/13.41 # Negative unit clauses : 7
% 19.55/13.41 # Non-unit-clauses : 74
% 19.55/13.41 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 2400
% 19.55/13.41 # ...number of literals in the above : 3674
% 19.55/13.41 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 19.55/13.41 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 19.55/13.41 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 995
% 19.55/13.41 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 867
% 19.55/13.41 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 9
% 19.55/13.41 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 40
% 19.55/13.41 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 19.55/13.41 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 19.55/13.41 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 19.55/13.41 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 19.55/13.41 # Condensation successes : 0
% 19.55/13.41 # Termbank termtop insertions : 35203
% 19.55/13.41
% 19.55/13.41 # -------------------------------------------------
% 19.55/13.41 # User time : 0.062 s
% 19.55/13.41 # System time : 0.010 s
% 19.55/13.41 # Total time : 0.072 s
% 19.55/13.41 # ...preprocessing : 0.067 s
% 19.55/13.41 # ...main loop : 0.005 s
% 19.55/13.41 # Maximum resident set size: 10596 pages
% 19.55/13.41
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------