TSTP Solution File: CSR034+4 by E-SAT---3.1.00

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem  : CSR034+4 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon May 20 19:17:21 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 1.74s 1.25s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.74s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   10 (   4 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   16 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   11 (   5   ~;   2   |;   1   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    4 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   3 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    7 (   1 sgn   3   !;   2   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query184,conjecture,
    ? [X24] :
      ( mtvisible(c_tptp_member3515_mt)
     => isa(c_wanica_districtsuriname,X24) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query184) ).

fof(ax3_44154,axiom,
    ! [X16] :
      ( individual(X16)
     => isa(X16,c_individual) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_44154) ).

fof(ax3_870,axiom,
    individual(c_wanica_districtsuriname),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_870) ).

fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ? [X24] :
        ( mtvisible(c_tptp_member3515_mt)
       => isa(c_wanica_districtsuriname,X24) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query184]) ).

fof(c_0_4,plain,
    ! [X29] :
      ( ~ individual(X29)
      | isa(X29,c_individual) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax3_44154])])]) ).

fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X25] :
      ( mtvisible(c_tptp_member3515_mt)
      & ~ isa(c_wanica_districtsuriname,X25) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_6,plain,
    ( isa(X1,c_individual)
    | ~ individual(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,plain,
    individual(c_wanica_districtsuriname),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax3_870]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ~ isa(c_wanica_districtsuriname,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]),c_0_8]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem    : CSR034+4 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.03/0.14  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime   : Sun May 19 01:39:07 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.21/0.48  Running first-order model finding
% 0.21/0.48  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 1.74/1.25  # Version: 3.1.0
% 1.74/1.25  # Preprocessing class: FMLLLMSLSSSNFFN.
% 1.74/1.25  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.74/1.25  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.74/1.25  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.74/1.25  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.74/1.25  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 1.74/1.25  # new_bool_3 with pid 24492 completed with status 0
% 1.74/1.25  # Result found by new_bool_3
% 1.74/1.25  # Preprocessing class: FMLLLMSLSSSNFFN.
% 1.74/1.25  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.74/1.25  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.74/1.25  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.74/1.25  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 1.74/1.25  # Search class: FHUNF-FFSM00-SFFFFFNN
% 1.74/1.25  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 1.74/1.25  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 1.74/1.25  # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 24495 completed with status 0
% 1.74/1.25  # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 1.74/1.25  # Preprocessing class: FMLLLMSLSSSNFFN.
% 1.74/1.25  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.74/1.25  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.74/1.25  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.74/1.25  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 1.74/1.25  # Search class: FHUNF-FFSM00-SFFFFFNN
% 1.74/1.25  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 1.74/1.25  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 1.74/1.25  # Preprocessing time       : 0.024 s
% 1.74/1.25  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 1.74/1.25  
% 1.74/1.25  # Proof found!
% 1.74/1.25  # SZS status Theorem
% 1.74/1.25  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.74/1.25  # Parsed axioms                        : 44217
% 1.74/1.25  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 44182
% 1.74/1.25  # Initial clauses                      : 36
% 1.74/1.25  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 1.74/1.25  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 36
% 1.74/1.25  # Processed clauses                    : 59
% 1.74/1.25  # ...of these trivial                  : 2
% 1.74/1.25  # ...subsumed                          : 5
% 1.74/1.25  # ...remaining for further processing  : 52
% 1.74/1.25  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 1.74/1.25  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 1.74/1.25  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 1.74/1.25  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 1.74/1.25  # Generated clauses                    : 4
% 1.74/1.25  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 3
% 1.74/1.25  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 1.74/1.25  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 1.74/1.25  # Paramodulations                      : 4
% 1.74/1.25  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 1.74/1.25  # NegExts                              : 0
% 1.74/1.25  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 1.74/1.25  # Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 1.74/1.25  # Total rewrite steps                  : 2
% 1.74/1.25  # ...of those cached                   : 0
% 1.74/1.25  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 1.74/1.25  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 1.74/1.25  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 1.74/1.25  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 1.74/1.25  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 1.74/1.25  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 1.74/1.25  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 1.74/1.25  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 1.74/1.25  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 1.74/1.25  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 1.74/1.25  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 1.74/1.25  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 1.74/1.25  # Current number of processed clauses  : 22
% 1.74/1.25  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 10
% 1.74/1.25  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 1.74/1.25  #    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 1.74/1.25  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 11
% 1.74/1.25  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 10
% 1.74/1.25  # ...number of literals in the above   : 20
% 1.74/1.25  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 1.74/1.25  # Current number of archived clauses   : 30
% 1.74/1.25  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 41
% 1.74/1.25  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 41
% 1.74/1.25  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 5
% 1.74/1.25  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 1.74/1.25  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 1.74/1.25  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 1.74/1.25  # BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 1.74/1.25  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 1.74/1.25  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 1.74/1.25  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 293006
% 1.74/1.25  # Search garbage collected termcells   : 157749
% 1.74/1.25  
% 1.74/1.25  # -------------------------------------------------
% 1.74/1.25  # User time                : 0.145 s
% 1.74/1.25  # System time              : 0.065 s
% 1.74/1.25  # Total time               : 0.210 s
% 1.74/1.25  # Maximum resident set size: 81076 pages
% 1.74/1.25  
% 1.74/1.25  # -------------------------------------------------
% 1.74/1.25  # User time                : 0.635 s
% 1.74/1.25  # System time              : 0.094 s
% 1.74/1.25  # Total time               : 0.729 s
% 1.74/1.25  # Maximum resident set size: 33928 pages
% 1.74/1.25  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------