TSTP Solution File: CSR034+1 by SPASS---3.9

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : CSR034+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 23:24:25 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.19s 0.44s
% Output   : Refutation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : CSR034+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 19:23:30 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.44  
% 0.19/0.44  SPASS V 3.9 
% 0.19/0.44  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.19/0.44  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.19/0.44  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 0.19/0.44  SPASS derived 37 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 85 clauses.
% 0.19/0.44  SPASS allocated 97744 KBytes.
% 0.19/0.44  SPASS spent	0:00:00.09 on the problem.
% 0.19/0.44  		0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 0.19/0.44  		0:00:00.03 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.19/0.44  		0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.19/0.44  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.19/0.44  		0:00:00.00 for the reduction.
% 0.19/0.44  
% 0.19/0.44  
% 0.19/0.44  Here is a proof with depth 6, length 38 :
% 0.19/0.44  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.19/0.44  1[0:Inp] ||  -> mtvisible(c_tptp_member3515_mt)*.
% 0.19/0.44  5[0:Inp] ||  -> genlmt(c_worldgeographydualistmt,c_worldgeographymt)*l.
% 0.19/0.44  6[0:Inp] ||  -> genlmt(c_ethnicgroupsvocabularymt,c_worldcompletedualistgeographymt)*l.
% 0.19/0.44  8[0:Inp] ||  -> genlmt(c_nooescapearchitecturemt,c_organizationdatamt)*l.
% 0.19/0.44  9[0:Inp] ||  -> genlmt(c_testvocabularymt,c_nooescapearchitecturemt)*r.
% 0.19/0.44  10[0:Inp] ||  -> genlmt(c_unitedstatesgeographydualistmt,c_worldgeographydualistmt)*r.
% 0.19/0.44  11[0:Inp] ||  -> genlmt(c_cyclistsmt,c_keinteractionresourcetestmt)*l.
% 0.19/0.44  12[0:Inp] ||  -> genlmt(c_keinteractionresourcetestmt,c_testvocabularymt)*r.
% 0.19/0.44  13[0:Inp] ||  -> genlmt(c_worldcompletedualistgeographymt,c_unitedstatesgeographydualistmt)*l.
% 0.19/0.44  14[0:Inp] ||  -> genlmt(c_massmediadatamt,c_ethnicgroupsmt)*l.
% 0.19/0.44  15[0:Inp] ||  -> genlmt(c_ethnicgroupsmt,c_ethnicgroupsvocabularymt)*r.
% 0.19/0.44  16[0:Inp] ||  -> genlmt(c_tptp_spindleheadmt,c_cyclistsmt)*r.
% 0.19/0.44  17[0:Inp] ||  -> genlmt(c_tptp_member3515_mt,c_tptp_spindleheadmt)*r.
% 0.19/0.44  19[0:Inp] || isa(c_wanica_districtsuriname,u)* -> .
% 0.19/0.44  20[0:Inp] ||  -> genlmt(c_organizationdatamt,f_contextofpcwfn(c_ap_martha_stewart_omnimedia_names_chairman))*r.
% 0.19/0.44  21[0:Inp] ||  -> genlmt(f_contextofpcwfn(c_ap_martha_stewart_omnimedia_names_chairman),c_massmediadatamt)*l.
% 0.19/0.44  23[0:Inp] || mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt) -> state_geopolitical(c_wanica_districtsuriname)*.
% 0.19/0.44  45[0:Inp] state_geopolitical(u) ||  -> isa(u,c_state_geopolitical)*.
% 0.19/0.44  60[0:Inp] mtvisible(u) || genlmt(u,v)* -> mtvisible(v)*.
% 0.19/0.44  71[0:Inp] || genlmt(u,v)* genlmt(v,w)* -> genlmt(u,w)*.
% 0.19/0.44  73[0:Res:1.0,60.0] || genlmt(c_tptp_member3515_mt,u) -> mtvisible(u)*.
% 0.19/0.44  74[0:Res:45.1,19.0] state_geopolitical(c_wanica_districtsuriname) ||  -> .
% 0.19/0.44  78[0:MRR:23.1,74.0] || mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt)* -> .
% 0.19/0.44  115[0:OCh:71.1,71.0,11.0,16.0] ||  -> genlmt(c_tptp_spindleheadmt,c_keinteractionresourcetestmt)*r.
% 0.19/0.44  116[0:OCh:71.1,71.0,8.0,9.0] ||  -> genlmt(c_testvocabularymt,c_organizationdatamt)*r.
% 0.19/0.44  118[0:OCh:71.1,71.0,6.0,15.0] ||  -> genlmt(c_ethnicgroupsmt,c_worldcompletedualistgeographymt)*r.
% 0.19/0.44  119[0:OCh:71.1,71.0,5.0,10.0] ||  -> genlmt(c_unitedstatesgeographydualistmt,c_worldgeographymt)*r.
% 0.19/0.44  120[0:OCh:71.1,71.0,118.0,13.0] ||  -> genlmt(c_ethnicgroupsmt,c_unitedstatesgeographydualistmt)*r.
% 0.19/0.44  123[0:OCh:71.1,71.0,20.0,21.0] ||  -> genlmt(c_organizationdatamt,c_massmediadatamt)*l.
% 0.19/0.44  124[0:OCh:71.1,71.0,123.0,116.0] ||  -> genlmt(c_testvocabularymt,c_massmediadatamt)*l.
% 0.19/0.44  125[0:OCh:71.1,71.0,124.0,12.0] ||  -> genlmt(c_keinteractionresourcetestmt,c_massmediadatamt)*l.
% 0.19/0.44  126[0:OCh:71.1,71.0,125.0,115.0] ||  -> genlmt(c_tptp_spindleheadmt,c_massmediadatamt)*r.
% 0.19/0.44  127[0:OCh:71.1,71.0,126.0,14.0] ||  -> genlmt(c_tptp_spindleheadmt,c_ethnicgroupsmt)*r.
% 0.19/0.44  128[0:Res:73.1,78.0] || genlmt(c_tptp_member3515_mt,c_worldgeographymt)*r -> .
% 0.19/0.44  130[0:NCh:71.2,71.1,128.0,119.0] || genlmt(c_tptp_member3515_mt,c_unitedstatesgeographydualistmt)*r -> .
% 0.19/0.44  131[0:NCh:71.2,71.1,130.0,120.0] || genlmt(c_tptp_member3515_mt,c_ethnicgroupsmt)*r -> .
% 0.19/0.44  132[0:NCh:71.2,71.1,131.0,127.0] || genlmt(c_tptp_member3515_mt,c_tptp_spindleheadmt)*r -> .
% 0.19/0.44  133[0:MRR:132.0,17.0] ||  -> .
% 0.19/0.44  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.19/0.44  Formulae used in the proof : query34 just1 just2 just4 just5 just8 just9 just10 just11 just12 just15 just18 just19 just16 just17 just14 just52 just62 just67
% 0.19/0.44  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------