TSTP Solution File: CSR033+1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : CSR033+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 23:21:17 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 1.48s 1.67s
% Output : Refutation 1.48s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.12 % Problem : CSR033+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.08/0.13 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 14:03:08 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.35 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.12/0.35 The process was started by sandbox on n029.cluster.edu,
% 0.12/0.35 Sat Jun 11 14:03:08 2022
% 0.12/0.35 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 23522.
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.12/0.35 set(auto).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.12/0.35 clear(print_given).
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 formula_list(usable).
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=3.
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 This is a Horn set without equality. The strategy will
% 0.12/0.35 be hyperresolution, with satellites in sos and nuclei
% 0.12/0.35 in usable.
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: clear(order_hyper).
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 ------------> process usable:
% 0.12/0.35 Following clause subsumed by 9 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -genlpreds(A,B)|predicate(B).
% 0.12/0.35 Following clause subsumed by 10 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -genlpreds(A,B)|predicate(A).
% 0.12/0.35 Following clause subsumed by 12 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -predicate(A)|genlpreds(A,A).
% 0.12/0.35 Following clause subsumed by 34 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -isa(A,B)|collection(B).
% 0.12/0.35 Following clause subsumed by 35 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -isa(A,B)|thing(A).
% 0.12/0.35 Following clause subsumed by 38 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -genlmt(A,B)|microtheory(B).
% 0.12/0.35 Following clause subsumed by 39 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -genlmt(A,B)|microtheory(A).
% 0.12/0.35 Following clause subsumed by 41 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -microtheory(A)|genlmt(A,A).
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 ------------> process sos:
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.12/0.38
% 0.12/0.38 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.12/0.38
% 0.12/0.38 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.12/0.38
% 0.12/0.38
% 0.12/0.38 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.12/0.38
% 0.12/0.38 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.12/0.38 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.12/0.38 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.12/0.38 number of clauses in intial UL: 42
% 0.12/0.38 number of clauses initially in problem: 55
% 0.12/0.38 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 76
% 0.12/0.38 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 75
% 0.12/0.38 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.12/0.38 absolute distinct symbol count: 36
% 0.12/0.38 distinct predicate count: 18
% 0.12/0.38 distinct function count: 0
% 0.12/0.38 distinct constant count: 18
% 0.12/0.38
% 0.12/0.38 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.12/0.38
% 0.12/0.38
% 0.12/0.38
% 0.12/0.38 =========== start of search ===========
% 1.48/1.67
% 1.48/1.67 -------- PROOF --------
% 1.48/1.67 % SZS status Theorem
% 1.48/1.67 % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.48/1.67
% 1.48/1.67 Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 1.48/1.67
% 1.48/1.67 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.48/1.67
% 1.48/1.67 Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 1.48/1.67
% 1.48/1.67 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.48/1.67
% 1.48/1.67 Model 4 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 1.48/1.67
% 1.48/1.67 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.48/1.67
% 1.48/1.67 Model 5 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 1.48/1.67
% 1.48/1.67 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.48/1.67
% 1.48/1.67 Model 6 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 1.48/1.67
% 1.48/1.67 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.48/1.67
% 1.48/1.67 Model 7 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 1.48/1.67
% 1.48/1.67 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.48/1.67
% 1.48/1.67 Model 8 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 1.48/1.67
% 1.48/1.67 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.48/1.67
% 1.48/1.67 Model 9 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 1.48/1.67
% 1.48/1.67 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.48/1.67
% 1.48/1.67 Model 10 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 1.48/1.67
% 1.48/1.67 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.48/1.67
% 1.48/1.67 Model 11 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 1.48/1.67
% 1.48/1.67 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.48/1.67
% 1.48/1.67 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.48/1.67
% 1.48/1.67 Model 12 [ 1 0 6773 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.48/1.67
% 1.48/1.67 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.48/1.67
% 1.48/1.67 Model 13 [ 1 1 394 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.48/1.67
% 1.48/1.67 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.48/1.67
% 1.48/1.67 Model 14 [ 1 1 8029 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.48/1.67
% 1.48/1.67 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.48/1.67
% 1.48/1.67 Model 15 [ 1 3 118498 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.48/1.67
% 1.48/1.67 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.48/1.67
% 1.48/1.67 Model 16 [ 1 0 13862 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.48/1.67
% 1.48/1.67 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.48/1.67
% 1.48/1.67 Model 17 [ 1 1 30917 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.48/1.67
% 1.48/1.67 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.48/1.67
% 1.48/1.67 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.48/1.67
% 1.48/1.67 Model 18 [ 2 0 21764 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.48/1.67
% 1.48/1.67 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.48/1.67
% 1.48/1.67 Model 19 [ 2 0 1324 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.48/1.67
% 1.48/1.67 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.48/1.67
% 1.48/1.67 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.48/1.67
% 1.48/1.67 Model 20 [ 15 0 11897 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.48/1.67
% 1.48/1.67 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.48/1.67
% 1.48/1.67 Model 21 [ 2 1 300 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.48/1.67
% 1.48/1.67 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.48/1.67
% 1.48/1.67 Model 22 [ 3 1 363 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.48/1.67
% 1.48/1.67 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.48/1.67
% 1.48/1.67 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.48/1.67
% 1.48/1.67 Model 23 [ 3 0 558 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.48/1.67
% 1.48/1.67 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.48/1.67
% 1.48/1.67 Model 24 [ 3 0 226 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.48/1.67
% 1.48/1.67 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.48/1.67
% 1.48/1.67 Model 25 [ 3 0 217 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.48/1.67
% 1.48/1.67 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.48/1.67
% 1.48/1.67 Model 26 [ 2 0 7099 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.48/1.67
% 1.48/1.67 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.48/1.67
% 1.48/1.67 Model 27 [ 3 0 273 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.48/1.67
% 1.48/1.67 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.48/1.67
% 1.48/1.67 Model 28 [ 8 0 249 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.48/1.67
% 1.48/1.67 -----> EMPTY CLAUSE at 1.29 sec ----> 137 [hyper,136,42,89] {-} $F.
% 1.48/1.67
% 1.48/1.67 Length of proof is 15. Level of proof is 6.
% 1.48/1.67
% 1.48/1.67 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 1.48/1.67 % SZS status Theorem
% 1.48/1.67 % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.48/1.67
% 1.48/1.67 1 [] {+} -geographicalsubregions(A,B)|inregion(B,A).
% 1.48/1.67 2 [] {+} -mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt)|geolevel_1(c_georegion_l1_x2_y0).
% 1.48/1.67 3 [] {+} -mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member2_mt)|geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l1_x2_y0,c_georegion_l2_x8_y2).
% 1.48/1.67 4 [] {+} -mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member2_mt)|geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x8_y2,c_georegion_l3_x25_y7).
% 1.48/1.67 5 [] {+} -mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member2_mt)|geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x25_y7,c_georegion_l4_x76_y23).
% 1.48/1.67 6 [] {+} -mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member2_mt)|inregion(c_geolocation_x76_y23,c_georegion_l4_x76_y23).
% 1.48/1.67 32 [] {+} -inregion(A,B)| -inregion(B,C)|inregion(A,C).
% 1.48/1.67 37 [] {+} -mtvisible(A)| -genlmt(A,B)|mtvisible(B).
% 1.48/1.67 42 [] {+} -inregion(c_geolocation_x76_y23,c_georegion_l1_x2_y0)| -geolevel_1(c_georegion_l1_x2_y0).
% 1.48/1.67 49 [] {+} genlmt(c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt,c_worldgeographymt).
% 1.48/1.67 50 [] {+} genlmt(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt,c_tptpgeo_member2_mt).
% 1.48/1.67 51 [] {+} genlmt(c_tptpgeo_member8_mt,c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt).
% 1.48/1.67 52 [] {+} genlmt(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt,c_tptpgeo_member8_mt).
% 1.48/1.67 55 [] {+} mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt).
% 1.48/1.67 71 [hyper,50,37,55] {+} mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member2_mt).
% 1.48/1.67 74 [hyper,52,37,55] {+} mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member8_mt).
% 1.48/1.67 79 [hyper,71,6] {+} inregion(c_geolocation_x76_y23,c_georegion_l4_x76_y23).
% 1.48/1.67 80 [hyper,71,5] {+} geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x25_y7,c_georegion_l4_x76_y23).
% 1.48/1.67 81 [hyper,71,4] {+} geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x8_y2,c_georegion_l3_x25_y7).
% 1.48/1.67 82 [hyper,71,3] {+} geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l1_x2_y0,c_georegion_l2_x8_y2).
% 1.48/1.67 83 [hyper,74,37,51] {+} mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt).
% 1.48/1.67 88 [hyper,83,37,49] {-} mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt).
% 1.48/1.67 89 [hyper,88,2] {+} geolevel_1(c_georegion_l1_x2_y0).
% 1.48/1.67 99 [hyper,80,1] {+} inregion(c_georegion_l4_x76_y23,c_georegion_l3_x25_y7).
% 1.48/1.67 108 [hyper,81,1] {+} inregion(c_georegion_l3_x25_y7,c_georegion_l2_x8_y2).
% 1.48/1.67 111 [hyper,82,1] {+} inregion(c_georegion_l2_x8_y2,c_georegion_l1_x2_y0).
% 1.48/1.67 123 [hyper,99,32,79] {+} inregion(c_geolocation_x76_y23,c_georegion_l3_x25_y7).
% 1.48/1.67 129 [hyper,108,32,123] {+} inregion(c_geolocation_x76_y23,c_georegion_l2_x8_y2).
% 1.48/1.67 136 [hyper,129,32,111] {+} inregion(c_geolocation_x76_y23,c_georegion_l1_x2_y0).
% 1.48/1.67 137 [hyper,136,42,89] {-} $F.
% 1.48/1.67
% 1.48/1.67 % SZS output end Refutation
% 1.48/1.67 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 1.48/1.67
% 1.48/1.67
% 1.48/1.67 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.48/1.67
% 1.48/1.67
% 1.48/1.67 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.48/1.67
% 1.48/1.67 ============ end of search ============
% 1.48/1.67
% 1.48/1.67 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 1.48/1.67
% 1.48/1.67 true clauses given 64 (68.1%)
% 1.48/1.67 false clauses given 30
% 1.48/1.67
% 1.48/1.67 FALSE TRUE
% 1.48/1.67 tot: 0 0 (-nan% true)
% 1.48/1.67
% 1.48/1.67
% 1.48/1.67 Model 28 [ 8 0 249 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.48/1.67
% 1.48/1.67 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 1.48/1.67
% 1.48/1.67 Process 23522 finished Sat Jun 11 14:03:10 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------