TSTP Solution File: CSR032+2 by iProver---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9
% Problem : CSR032+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 3 02:11:13 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 7.20s 1.70s
% Output : CNFRefutation 7.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 23 ( 7 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 39 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 30 ( 14 ~; 9 |; 1 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 6 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 4 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 18 ( 1 sgn 9 !; 3 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f318,axiom,
individual(f_citynamedfn(s_agen,c_france)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax1_318) ).
fof(f390,axiom,
! [X0] :
( individual(X0)
=> trajector_underspecified(X0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax1_390) ).
fof(f1012,axiom,
! [X12] :
( trajector_underspecified(X12)
=> isa(X12,c_trajector_underspecified) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax1_1012) ).
fof(f1132,conjecture,
? [X21] :
( mtvisible(c_reasoningaboutpossibleantecedentsmt)
=> isa(f_citynamedfn(s_agen,c_france),X21) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query82) ).
fof(f1133,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X21] :
( mtvisible(c_reasoningaboutpossibleantecedentsmt)
=> isa(f_citynamedfn(s_agen,c_france),X21) ),
inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f1132]) ).
fof(f1678,plain,
! [X0] :
( trajector_underspecified(X0)
=> isa(X0,c_trajector_underspecified) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f1012]) ).
fof(f1796,plain,
~ ? [X0] :
( mtvisible(c_reasoningaboutpossibleantecedentsmt)
=> isa(f_citynamedfn(s_agen,c_france),X0) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f1133]) ).
fof(f2072,plain,
! [X0] :
( trajector_underspecified(X0)
| ~ individual(X0) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f390]) ).
fof(f2561,plain,
! [X0] :
( isa(X0,c_trajector_underspecified)
| ~ trajector_underspecified(X0) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f1678]) ).
fof(f2685,plain,
! [X0] :
( ~ isa(f_citynamedfn(s_agen,c_france),X0)
& mtvisible(c_reasoningaboutpossibleantecedentsmt) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f1796]) ).
fof(f3001,plain,
individual(f_citynamedfn(s_agen,c_france)),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f318]) ).
fof(f3073,plain,
! [X0] :
( trajector_underspecified(X0)
| ~ individual(X0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2072]) ).
fof(f3615,plain,
! [X0] :
( isa(X0,c_trajector_underspecified)
| ~ trajector_underspecified(X0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2561]) ).
fof(f3726,plain,
! [X0] : ~ isa(f_citynamedfn(s_agen,c_france),X0),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2685]) ).
cnf(c_364,plain,
individual(f_citynamedfn(s_agen,c_france)),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3001]) ).
cnf(c_436,plain,
( ~ individual(X0)
| trajector_underspecified(X0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3073]) ).
cnf(c_978,plain,
( ~ trajector_underspecified(X0)
| isa(X0,c_trajector_underspecified) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3615]) ).
cnf(c_1088,negated_conjecture,
~ isa(f_citynamedfn(s_agen,c_france),X0),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3726]) ).
cnf(c_2412,plain,
( ~ trajector_underspecified(X0)
| isa(X0,c_trajector_underspecified) ),
inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_978]) ).
cnf(c_2616,plain,
( ~ individual(X0)
| trajector_underspecified(X0) ),
inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_436]) ).
cnf(c_11645,plain,
( ~ individual(X0)
| isa(X0,c_trajector_underspecified) ),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_2616,c_2412]) ).
cnf(c_17649,plain,
isa(f_citynamedfn(s_agen,c_france),c_trajector_underspecified),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_11645,c_364]) ).
cnf(c_17652,plain,
$false,
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_17649,c_1088]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : CSR032+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Thu May 2 23:12:46 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.47 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.19/0.47 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule fof_schedule --heuristic_context casc_unsat --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 7.20/1.70 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 7.20/1.70 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 7.20/1.70
% 7.20/1.70 %---------------- iProver v3.9 (pre CASC 2024/SMT-COMP 2024) ----------------%
% 7.20/1.70
% 7.20/1.70 ------ iProver source info
% 7.20/1.70
% 7.20/1.70 git: date: 2024-05-02 19:28:25 +0000
% 7.20/1.70 git: sha1: a33b5eb135c74074ba803943bb12f2ebd971352f
% 7.20/1.70 git: non_committed_changes: false
% 7.20/1.70
% 7.20/1.70 ------ Parsing...
% 7.20/1.70 ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel & Parsing by iProver...
% 7.20/1.70
% 7.20/1.70 ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 30 0s sf_e pe_s pe:1:0s pe:2:0s pe:4:0s pe:8:0s pe:16:0s pe:32:0s pe:64:0s pe:128:0s
% 7.20/1.70
% 7.20/1.70 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 7.20/1.70
% 7.20/1.70 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 7.20/1.70
% 7.20/1.70
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------