TSTP Solution File: CSR032+2 by Vampire-SAT---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire-SAT---4.8
% Problem : CSR032+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s
% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun May 5 04:56:58 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.15s 0.33s
% Output : Refutation 0.15s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 21 ( 7 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 35 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 27 ( 13 ~; 6 |; 1 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 7 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 4 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 5 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 15 ( 12 !; 3 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f4174,plain,
$false,
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f4173,f2945]) ).
fof(f2945,plain,
individual(f_citynamedfn(s_agen,c_france)),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f318]) ).
fof(f318,axiom,
individual(f_citynamedfn(s_agen,c_france)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax1_318) ).
fof(f4173,plain,
~ individual(f_citynamedfn(s_agen,c_france)),
inference(resolution,[],[f4172,f3346]) ).
fof(f3346,plain,
! [X0] :
( trajector_underspecified(X0)
| ~ individual(X0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2269]) ).
fof(f2269,plain,
! [X0] :
( trajector_underspecified(X0)
| ~ individual(X0) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f390]) ).
fof(f390,axiom,
! [X0] :
( individual(X0)
=> trajector_underspecified(X0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax1_390) ).
fof(f4172,plain,
~ trajector_underspecified(f_citynamedfn(s_agen,c_france)),
inference(resolution,[],[f4171,f3079]) ).
fof(f3079,plain,
! [X0] :
( location_underspecified(X0)
| ~ trajector_underspecified(X0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2002]) ).
fof(f2002,plain,
! [X0] :
( location_underspecified(X0)
| ~ trajector_underspecified(X0) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f37]) ).
fof(f37,axiom,
! [X0] :
( trajector_underspecified(X0)
=> location_underspecified(X0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax1_37) ).
fof(f4171,plain,
~ location_underspecified(f_citynamedfn(s_agen,c_france)),
inference(resolution,[],[f3205,f2687]) ).
fof(f2687,plain,
! [X0] : ~ isa(f_citynamedfn(s_agen,c_france),X0),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1889]) ).
fof(f1889,plain,
! [X0] :
( ~ isa(f_citynamedfn(s_agen,c_france),X0)
& mtvisible(c_reasoningaboutpossibleantecedentsmt) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f1134]) ).
fof(f1134,plain,
~ ? [X0] :
( mtvisible(c_reasoningaboutpossibleantecedentsmt)
=> isa(f_citynamedfn(s_agen,c_france),X0) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f1133]) ).
fof(f1133,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X21] :
( mtvisible(c_reasoningaboutpossibleantecedentsmt)
=> isa(f_citynamedfn(s_agen,c_france),X21) ),
inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f1132]) ).
fof(f1132,conjecture,
? [X21] :
( mtvisible(c_reasoningaboutpossibleantecedentsmt)
=> isa(f_citynamedfn(s_agen,c_france),X21) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query82) ).
fof(f3205,plain,
! [X0] :
( isa(X0,c_location_underspecified)
| ~ location_underspecified(X0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2128]) ).
fof(f2128,plain,
! [X0] :
( isa(X0,c_location_underspecified)
| ~ location_underspecified(X0) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f1236]) ).
fof(f1236,plain,
! [X0] :
( location_underspecified(X0)
=> isa(X0,c_location_underspecified) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f1010]) ).
fof(f1010,axiom,
! [X12] :
( location_underspecified(X12)
=> isa(X12,c_location_underspecified) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax1_1010) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.02/0.09 % Problem : CSR032+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.02/0.10 % Command : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s
% 0.10/0.29 % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.29 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.29 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.29 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.29 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.29 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.29 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.29 % DateTime : Fri May 3 20:19:37 EDT 2024
% 0.10/0.29 % CPUTime :
% 0.10/0.29 % (5587)Running in auto input_syntax mode. Trying TPTP
% 0.15/0.32 % (5590)dis-2_2:3_amm=sco:anc=none:bce=on:fsr=off:gsp=on:nm=16:nwc=1.2:nicw=on:sac=on:sp=weighted_frequency_476 on theBenchmark for (476ds/0Mi)
% 0.15/0.32 % (5593)dis+11_4:5_nm=4_216 on theBenchmark for (216ds/0Mi)
% 0.15/0.32 % (5594)fmb+10_1_fmbas=off:fmbsr=1.3:nm=2:si=on:rtra=on:rawr=on:rp=on:fmbksg=on_1451 on theBenchmark for (1451ds/0Mi)
% 0.15/0.32 % (5588)fmb+10_1_fmbas=off:fmbsr=1.3:nm=2_1451 on theBenchmark for (1451ds/0Mi)
% 0.15/0.32 % (5589)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbas=expand:fmbksg=on:fmbsr=1.3_569 on theBenchmark for (569ds/0Mi)
% 0.15/0.32 % (5591)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbas=expand:fmbksg=on:fmbsr=1.3:gsp=on:nm=4_470 on theBenchmark for (470ds/0Mi)
% 0.15/0.32 % (5592)dis+1_20_av=off:lcm=predicate:nm=2:nwc=2.0_396 on theBenchmark for (396ds/0Mi)
% 0.15/0.33 % (5593)First to succeed.
% 0.15/0.33 % (5593)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-5587"
% 0.15/0.33 % (5593)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.15/0.33 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.15/0.33 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.15/0.33 % (5593)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.33 % (5593)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.15/0.33 % (5593)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.15/0.33
% 0.15/0.33 % (5593)Memory used [KB]: 2343
% 0.15/0.33 % (5593)Time elapsed: 0.012 s
% 0.15/0.33 % (5593)Instructions burned: 36 (million)
% 0.15/0.33 % (5587)Success in time 0.036 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------