TSTP Solution File: CSR032+2 by E---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1.00
% Problem : CSR032+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat May 4 07:31:25 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.46s 0.70s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.46s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 10 ( 4 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 16 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 11 ( 5 ~; 2 |; 1 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 3 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 4 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 7 ( 1 sgn 3 !; 2 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query82,conjecture,
? [X22] :
( mtvisible(c_reasoningaboutpossibleantecedentsmt)
=> isa(f_citynamedfn(s_agen,c_france),X22) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.LKsPvcjkP4/E---3.1_19286.p',query82) ).
fof(ax1_1014,axiom,
! [X13] :
( individual(X13)
=> isa(X13,c_individual) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.LKsPvcjkP4/E---3.1_19286.p',ax1_1014) ).
fof(ax1_318,axiom,
individual(f_citynamedfn(s_agen,c_france)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.LKsPvcjkP4/E---3.1_19286.p',ax1_318) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X22] :
( mtvisible(c_reasoningaboutpossibleantecedentsmt)
=> isa(f_citynamedfn(s_agen,c_france),X22) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query82]) ).
fof(c_0_4,plain,
! [X48] :
( ~ individual(X48)
| isa(X48,c_individual) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax1_1014])])]) ).
fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
! [X23] :
( mtvisible(c_reasoningaboutpossibleantecedentsmt)
& ~ isa(f_citynamedfn(s_agen,c_france),X23) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
( isa(X1,c_individual)
| ~ individual(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
individual(f_citynamedfn(s_agen,c_france)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax1_318]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
~ isa(f_citynamedfn(s_agen,c_france),X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]),c_0_8]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.19 % Problem : CSR032+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.12/0.20 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.20/0.41 % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.20/0.41 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.20/0.41 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.20/0.41 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.20/0.41 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.20/0.41 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.20/0.41 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.20/0.41 % DateTime : Fri May 3 15:08:23 EDT 2024
% 0.20/0.41 % CPUTime :
% 0.42/0.60 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.42/0.60 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.LKsPvcjkP4/E---3.1_19286.p
% 0.46/0.70 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.46/0.70 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.46/0.70 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.46/0.70 # Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 900s (3) cores
% 0.46/0.70 # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.46/0.70 # Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.46/0.70 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.46/0.70 # sh5l with pid 19447 completed with status 0
% 0.46/0.70 # Result found by sh5l
% 0.46/0.70 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.46/0.70 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.46/0.70 # Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 900s (3) cores
% 0.46/0.70 # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.46/0.70 # Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.46/0.70 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.46/0.70 # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.46/0.70 # Search class: FHHNM-FSLM31-SFFFFFNN
% 0.46/0.70 # partial match(2): FHHNM-SSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.46/0.70 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.46/0.70 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d with 181s (1) cores
% 0.46/0.70 # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d with pid 19456 completed with status 0
% 0.46/0.70 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d
% 0.46/0.70 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.46/0.70 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.46/0.70 # Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 900s (3) cores
% 0.46/0.70 # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.46/0.70 # Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.46/0.70 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.46/0.70 # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.46/0.70 # Search class: FHHNM-FSLM31-SFFFFFNN
% 0.46/0.70 # partial match(2): FHHNM-SSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.46/0.70 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.46/0.70 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d with 181s (1) cores
% 0.46/0.70 # Preprocessing time : 0.008 s
% 0.46/0.70 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.46/0.70
% 0.46/0.70 # Proof found!
% 0.46/0.70 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.46/0.70 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.46/0.70 # Parsed axioms : 1132
% 0.46/0.70 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 809
% 0.46/0.70 # Initial clauses : 324
% 0.46/0.70 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.46/0.70 # Initial clauses in saturation : 324
% 0.46/0.70 # Processed clauses : 376
% 0.46/0.70 # ...of these trivial : 1
% 0.46/0.70 # ...subsumed : 27
% 0.46/0.70 # ...remaining for further processing : 348
% 0.46/0.70 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.46/0.70 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.46/0.70 # Backward-subsumed : 1
% 0.46/0.70 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.46/0.70 # Generated clauses : 8
% 0.46/0.70 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 7
% 0.46/0.70 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.46/0.70 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.46/0.70 # Paramodulations : 8
% 0.46/0.70 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.46/0.70 # NegExts : 0
% 0.46/0.70 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.46/0.70 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.46/0.70 # Total rewrite steps : 1
% 0.46/0.70 # ...of those cached : 0
% 0.46/0.70 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.46/0.70 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.46/0.70 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.46/0.70 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.46/0.70 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.46/0.70 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.46/0.70 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.46/0.70 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.46/0.70 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.46/0.70 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.46/0.70 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.46/0.70 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.46/0.70 # Current number of processed clauses : 52
% 0.46/0.70 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 21
% 0.46/0.70 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.46/0.70 # Negative unit clauses : 3
% 0.46/0.70 # Non-unit-clauses : 28
% 0.46/0.70 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 250
% 0.46/0.70 # ...number of literals in the above : 435
% 0.46/0.70 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.46/0.70 # Current number of archived clauses : 296
% 0.46/0.70 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 7235
% 0.46/0.70 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 6869
% 0.46/0.70 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 28
% 0.46/0.70 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 274
% 0.46/0.70 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.46/0.70 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.46/0.70 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.46/0.70 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.46/0.70 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.46/0.70 # Termbank termtop insertions : 21704
% 0.46/0.70 # Search garbage collected termcells : 5466
% 0.46/0.70
% 0.46/0.70 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.46/0.70 # User time : 0.043 s
% 0.46/0.70 # System time : 0.014 s
% 0.46/0.70 # Total time : 0.057 s
% 0.46/0.70 # Maximum resident set size: 4732 pages
% 0.46/0.70
% 0.46/0.70 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.46/0.70 # User time : 0.058 s
% 0.46/0.70 # System time : 0.019 s
% 0.46/0.70 # Total time : 0.077 s
% 0.46/0.70 # Maximum resident set size: 2660 pages
% 0.46/0.70 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.46/0.71 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------