TSTP Solution File: CSR032+1 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : CSR032+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 02:46:42 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 7.47s 2.43s
% Output : CNFRefutation 7.47s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 2
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 7 ( 5 unt; 0 nHn; 7 RR)
% Number of literals : 9 ( 0 equ; 4 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 4 ( 2 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_57,plain,
( isa(X1,c_individual)
| ~ individual(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-hctu_9h3/lgb.p',i_0_57) ).
cnf(i_0_1,plain,
individual(f_citynamedfn(s_agen,c_france)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-hctu_9h3/lgb.p',i_0_1) ).
cnf(i_0_68,negated_conjecture,
~ isa(f_citynamedfn(s_agen,c_france),X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-hctu_9h3/lgb.p',i_0_68) ).
cnf(c_0_72,plain,
( isa(X1,c_individual)
| ~ individual(X1) ),
i_0_57 ).
cnf(c_0_73,plain,
individual(f_citynamedfn(s_agen,c_france)),
i_0_1 ).
cnf(c_0_74,negated_conjecture,
~ isa(f_citynamedfn(s_agen,c_france),X1),
i_0_68 ).
cnf(c_0_75,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_72,c_0_73]),c_0_74]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.13 % Problem : CSR032+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.12/0.13 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 03:25:05 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.46 # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 7.47/2.43 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 7.47/2.43 # No SInE strategy applied
% 7.47/2.43 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 7.47/2.43 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___103_C18_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_S0Y
% 7.47/2.43 # and selection function SelectMaxLComplexAvoidPosPred.
% 7.47/2.43 #
% 7.47/2.43 # Preprocessing time : 0.023 s
% 7.47/2.43
% 7.47/2.43 # Proof found!
% 7.47/2.43 # SZS status Theorem
% 7.47/2.43 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.47/2.43 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.47/2.43
% 7.47/2.43 # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.47/2.43 # User time : 0.025 s
% 7.47/2.43 # System time : 0.006 s
% 7.47/2.43 # Total time : 0.030 s
% 7.47/2.43 # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 7.47/2.43
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------