TSTP Solution File: CSR031+3 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : CSR031+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 03:01:32 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.84s 2.00s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.84s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 14 ( 8 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 20 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 17 ( 11 ~; 4 |; 1 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 1 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 5 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 2 ( 2 usr; 2 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 9 ( 1 sgn 6 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query131,conjecture,
~ disjointwith(c_tptptptpcol_16_8398,c_tptpcol_16_18488),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',query131) ).
fof(ax2_3089,axiom,
! [X1] :
~ ( collection(X1)
& individual(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_3089) ).
fof(ax2_7583,axiom,
! [X2,X4] :
( disjointwith(X2,X4)
=> collection(X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_7583) ).
fof(ax2_781,axiom,
individual(c_tptptptpcol_16_8398),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_781) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
~ ~ disjointwith(c_tptptptpcol_16_8398,c_tptpcol_16_18488),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query131]) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
! [X2] :
( ~ collection(X2)
| ~ individual(X2) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax2_3089])]) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X5,X6] :
( ~ disjointwith(X5,X6)
| collection(X5) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax2_7583])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
disjointwith(c_tptptptpcol_16_8398,c_tptpcol_16_18488),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( ~ individual(X1)
| ~ collection(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
individual(c_tptptptpcol_16_8398),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax2_781]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( collection(X1)
| ~ disjointwith(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
disjointwith(c_tptptptpcol_16_8398,c_tptpcol_16_18488),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
~ collection(c_tptptptpcol_16_8398),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_12]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : CSR031+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.14/0.34 % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.34 % DateTime : Fri Jun 10 03:42:58 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.84/2.00 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.84/2.00 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.84/2.00 # Preprocessing time : 0.158 s
% 0.84/2.00
% 0.84/2.00 # Proof found!
% 0.84/2.00 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.84/2.00 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.84/2.00 # Proof object total steps : 14
% 0.84/2.00 # Proof object clause steps : 6
% 0.84/2.00 # Proof object formula steps : 8
% 0.84/2.00 # Proof object conjectures : 5
% 0.84/2.00 # Proof object clause conjectures : 2
% 0.84/2.00 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.84/2.00 # Proof object initial clauses used : 4
% 0.84/2.00 # Proof object initial formulas used : 4
% 0.84/2.00 # Proof object generating inferences : 2
% 0.84/2.00 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 1
% 0.84/2.00 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.84/2.00 # Parsed axioms : 8006
% 0.84/2.00 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 7940
% 0.84/2.00 # Initial clauses : 66
% 0.84/2.00 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.84/2.00 # Initial clauses in saturation : 66
% 0.84/2.00 # Processed clauses : 77
% 0.84/2.00 # ...of these trivial : 7
% 0.84/2.00 # ...subsumed : 16
% 0.84/2.00 # ...remaining for further processing : 53
% 0.84/2.00 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.84/2.00 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.84/2.00 # Backward-subsumed : 1
% 0.84/2.00 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.84/2.00 # Generated clauses : 67
% 0.84/2.00 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 54
% 0.84/2.00 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.84/2.00 # Paramodulations : 67
% 0.84/2.00 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.84/2.00 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.84/2.00 # Current number of processed clauses : 52
% 0.84/2.00 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 23
% 0.84/2.00 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.84/2.00 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.84/2.00 # Non-unit-clauses : 28
% 0.84/2.00 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 43
% 0.84/2.00 # ...number of literals in the above : 67
% 0.84/2.00 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.84/2.00 # Current number of archived clauses : 1
% 0.84/2.00 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 39
% 0.84/2.00 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 33
% 0.84/2.00 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 17
% 0.84/2.00 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 21
% 0.84/2.00 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.84/2.00 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.84/2.00 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.84/2.00 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.84/2.00 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.84/2.00 # Termbank termtop insertions : 53965
% 0.84/2.00
% 0.84/2.00 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.84/2.00 # User time : 0.153 s
% 0.84/2.00 # System time : 0.006 s
% 0.84/2.00 # Total time : 0.159 s
% 0.84/2.00 # Maximum resident set size: 19716 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------