TSTP Solution File: CSR031+2 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : CSR031+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 02:46:41 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 5.94s 2.66s
% Output : CNFRefutation 5.94s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 13 ( 7 unt; 0 nHn; 13 RR)
% Number of literals : 19 ( 0 equ; 9 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 2 ( 2 usr; 2 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 10 ( 2 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_126,plain,
( disjointwith(X1,X2)
| ~ disjointwith(X2,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-7qyj162e/input.p',i_0_126) ).
cnf(i_0_1065,negated_conjecture,
disjointwith(c_tptptptpcol_16_8398,c_tptpcol_16_18488),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-7qyj162e/input.p',i_0_1065) ).
cnf(i_0_327,plain,
( ~ individual(X1)
| ~ collection(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-7qyj162e/input.p',i_0_327) ).
cnf(i_0_493,plain,
individual(c_tptptptpcol_16_8398),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-7qyj162e/input.p',i_0_493) ).
cnf(i_0_123,plain,
( collection(X1)
| ~ disjointwith(X2,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-7qyj162e/input.p',i_0_123) ).
cnf(c_0_1071,plain,
( disjointwith(X1,X2)
| ~ disjointwith(X2,X1) ),
i_0_126 ).
cnf(c_0_1072,negated_conjecture,
disjointwith(c_tptptptpcol_16_8398,c_tptpcol_16_18488),
i_0_1065 ).
cnf(c_0_1073,plain,
( ~ individual(X1)
| ~ collection(X1) ),
i_0_327 ).
cnf(c_0_1074,plain,
individual(c_tptptptpcol_16_8398),
i_0_493 ).
cnf(c_0_1075,plain,
( collection(X1)
| ~ disjointwith(X2,X1) ),
i_0_123 ).
cnf(c_0_1076,negated_conjecture,
disjointwith(c_tptpcol_16_18488,c_tptptptpcol_16_8398),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_1071,c_0_1072]) ).
cnf(c_0_1077,plain,
~ collection(c_tptptptpcol_16_8398),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_1073,c_0_1074]) ).
cnf(c_0_1078,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_1075,c_0_1076]),c_0_1077]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : CSR031+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.14/0.34 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.34 % DateTime : Fri Jun 10 00:46:04 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.45 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.21/0.48 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/0.48 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.21/0.48 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.21/0.48 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 5.94/2.66 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN:
% 5.94/2.66 # Version: 2.1pre011
% 5.94/2.66 # Preprocessing time : 0.022 s
% 5.94/2.66
% 5.94/2.66 # Proof found!
% 5.94/2.66 # SZS status Theorem
% 5.94/2.66 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 5.94/2.66 # Proof object total steps : 13
% 5.94/2.66 # Proof object clause steps : 8
% 5.94/2.66 # Proof object formula steps : 5
% 5.94/2.66 # Proof object conjectures : 3
% 5.94/2.66 # Proof object clause conjectures : 2
% 5.94/2.66 # Proof object formula conjectures : 1
% 5.94/2.66 # Proof object initial clauses used : 5
% 5.94/2.66 # Proof object initial formulas used : 5
% 5.94/2.66 # Proof object generating inferences : 3
% 5.94/2.66 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 1
% 5.94/2.66 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 5.94/2.66 # Parsed axioms : 1065
% 5.94/2.66 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 5.94/2.66 # Initial clauses : 1065
% 5.94/2.66 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 5.94/2.66 # Initial clauses in saturation : 1065
% 5.94/2.66 # Processed clauses : 1067
% 5.94/2.66 # ...of these trivial : 1
% 5.94/2.66 # ...subsumed : 31
% 5.94/2.66 # ...remaining for further processing : 1035
% 5.94/2.66 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 5.94/2.66 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 5.94/2.66 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 5.94/2.66 # Backward-rewritten : 1
% 5.94/2.66 # Generated clauses : 1379
% 5.94/2.66 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 1169
% 5.94/2.66 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 5.94/2.66 # Paramodulations : 1379
% 5.94/2.66 # Factorizations : 0
% 5.94/2.66 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 5.94/2.66 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 5.94/2.66 # Propositional unsat check successes : 0
% 5.94/2.66 # Current number of processed clauses : 1034
% 5.94/2.66 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 331
% 5.94/2.66 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 5.94/2.66 # Negative unit clauses : 3
% 5.94/2.66 # Non-unit-clauses : 700
% 5.94/2.66 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1165
% 5.94/2.66 # ...number of literals in the above : 1827
% 5.94/2.66 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 5.94/2.66 # Current number of archived clauses : 1
% 5.94/2.66 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 80450
% 5.94/2.66 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 73738
% 5.94/2.66 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 31
% 5.94/2.66 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1067
% 5.94/2.66 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 5.94/2.66 # BW rewrite match attempts : 4
% 5.94/2.66 # BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 5.94/2.66 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 5.94/2.66 # Condensation successes : 0
% 5.94/2.66 # Termbank termtop insertions : 24912
% 5.94/2.66
% 5.94/2.66 # -------------------------------------------------
% 5.94/2.66 # User time : 0.052 s
% 5.94/2.66 # System time : 0.008 s
% 5.94/2.66 # Total time : 0.060 s
% 5.94/2.66 # ...preprocessing : 0.022 s
% 5.94/2.66 # ...main loop : 0.038 s
% 5.94/2.66 # Maximum resident set size: 9436 pages
% 5.94/2.66
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------